skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Degenerate variational integrators for magnetic field line flow and guiding center trajectories

Journal Article · · Physics of Plasmas
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5022277· OSTI ID:1463903
 [1];  [2];  [3]; ORCiD logo [4];  [5];  [6]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)
  2. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  3. Courant Inst. of Mathematical Sciences, New York, NY (United States)
  4. Max-Planck-Inst. fur Plasmaphysik, Garching (Germany)
  5. Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States); Univ. of Science and Technology of China, Hefei (China). Dept. of Modern Physics
  6. Princeton Plasma Physics Lab. (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)

Symplectic integrators offer many benefits for numerically approximating solutions to Hamiltonian differential equations, including bounded energy error and the preservation of invariant sets. Two important Hamiltonian systems encountered in plasma physics—the flow of magnetic field lines and the guiding center motion of magnetized charged particles—resist symplectic integration by conventional means because the dynamics are most naturally formulated in non-canonical coordinates. New algorithms were recently developed using the variational integration formalism; however, those integrators were found to admit parasitic mode instabilities due to their multistep character. This work eliminates the multistep character, and therefore the parasitic mode instabilities via an adaptation of the variational integration formalism that we deem “degenerate variational integration.” Both the magnetic field line and guiding center Lagrangians are degenerate in the sense that the resultant Euler-Lagrange equations are systems of first-order ordinary differential equations. We show that retaining the same degree of degeneracy when constructing discrete Lagrangians yields one-step variational integrators preserving a non-canonical symplectic structure. Lastly, numerical examples demonstrate the benefits of the new algorithms, including superior stability relative to the existing variational integrators for these systems and superior qualitative behavior relative to non-conservative algorithms.

Research Organization:
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States); Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); European Unions Horizon 2020
Grant/Contract Number:
708124; AC02-09CH11466; AC52-07NA27344; AC52-06NA25396
OSTI ID:
1463903
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1889527
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-744319; TRN: US1902345
Journal Information:
Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 25, Issue 5; ISSN 1070-664X
Publisher:
American Institute of Physics (AIP)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 17 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (55)

A description of the full-particle-orbit-following SPIRAL code for simulating fast-ion experiments in tokamaks journal January 2013
On the Numerical Integration of Ordinary Differential Equations by Processed Methods journal January 2004
Variational integrators for electric circuits journal June 2013
Gauge properties of the guiding center variational symplectic integrator journal May 2012
Development of variational guiding center algorithms for parallel calculations in experimental magnetic equilibria journal April 2015
Hamiltonian theory of guiding-center motion journal May 2009
Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics book January 1989
High order volume-preserving algorithms for relativistic charged particles in general electromagnetic fields text January 2016
Hamiltonian guiding center drift orbit calculation for plasmas of arbitrary cross section journal January 1984
Variational Symplectic Integrator for Long-Time Simulations of the Guiding-Center Motion of Charged Particles in General Magnetic Fields journal January 2008
ISDEP: Integrator of stochastic differential equations for plasmas journal September 2012
Monte Carlo method and High Performance Computing for solving Fokker-Planck equation of minority plasma particles text January 2015
Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics book January 1978
Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry book January 1999
Canonical symplectic particle-in-cell method for long-term large-scale simulations of the Vlasov–Maxwell equations journal December 2015
Symplectic integration of Hamiltonian systems journal May 1990
NBI fast ion confinement in the helical core of MAST hybrid-like plasmas journal May 2014
Lie-Poisson Hamilton-Jacobi theory and Lie-Poisson integrators journal November 1988
Mathematical methods of classical mechanics journal March 1990
The Accurate Particle Tracer Code text January 2016
Backward error analysis for multistep methods journal December 1999
Noncanonical Hamiltonian mechanics and its application to magnetic field line flow journal November 1983
Volume-preserving algorithms for charged particle dynamics journal January 2015
ASCOT: solving the kinetic equation of minority particle species in tokamak plasmas text January 2013
Variational symplectic algorithm for guiding center dynamics and its application in tokamak geometry journal April 2009
Toroidal regularization of the guiding center Lagrangian journal November 2017
Variational principles of guiding centre motion journal February 1983
GEMPIC: geometric electromagnetic particle-in-cell methods journal July 2017
ASCOT: Solving the kinetic equation of minority particle species in tokamak plasmas journal April 2014
Convergence and stability in the numerical integration of ordinary differential equations journal December 1956
Hamiltonian guiding center equations in toroidal magnetic configurations journal March 2003
Comment on “Symplectic integration of magnetic systems” by Stephen D. Webb [J. Comput. Phys. 270 (2014) 570–576] journal February 2015
A Can0nical Integrati0n Technique journal August 1983
Adiabatic charged-particle motion journal January 1963
Variational formulation of macro-particle plasma simulation algorithms journal May 2014
Fourth-order symplectic integration journal May 1990
High order volume-preserving algorithms for relativistic charged particles in general electromagnetic fields journal September 2016
Discrete mechanics and variational integrators journal May 2001
Poisson integrators journal December 2004
Variational symplectic algorithm for guiding center dynamics in the inner magnetosphere journal May 2011
Numerically induced stochasticity journal July 1990
Monte Carlo method and High Performance Computing for solving Fokker–Planck equation of minority plasma particles journal March 2015
Runge-kutta schemes for Hamiltonian systems journal December 1988
The accurate particle tracer code journal November 2017
Regular and Stochastic Motion book January 1983
Construction of higher order symplectic integrators journal November 1990
Discrete Hamiltonian variational integrators journal March 2011
Mathematical methods of classical mechanics journal July 1983
Variational formulation of particle algorithms for kinetic plasma simulations journal July 2013
Numerically induced stochasticity journal March 1991
Geometric integration of the Vlasov-Maxwell system with a variational particle-in-cell scheme journal August 2012
GEMPIC: Geometric ElectroMagnetic Particle-In-Cell Methods text January 2016
Integrators for Lie-Poisson dynamical systems journal May 1991
Discrete Hamiltonian Variational Integrators preprint January 2010
Geometric integrators for ODEs journal April 2006

Cited By (1)


Similar Records