skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Cost comparison of printed circuit heat exchanger to low cost periodic flow regenerator for use as recuperator in a s-CO2 Brayton cycle

Journal Article · · Applied Energy

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (sCO2) power cycles have the potential to deliver high efficiency at low cost. However, in order for an sCO2 cycle to reach high efficiency, highly effective recuperators are needed. These recuperative heat exchangers must transfer heat at a rate that is substantially larger than the heat transfer to the cycle itself and can therefore represent a significant portion of the power block costs. Regenerators are proposed as a cost saving alternative to high cost printed circuit recuperators for this application. A regenerator is an indirect heat exchanger which periodically stores and releases heat to the working fluid. The simple design of a regenerator can be made more inexpensively compared to current options. The objective of this paper is a detailed evaluation of regenerators as a competing technology for recuperators within an sCO2 Brayton cycle. The level of the analysis presented here is sufficient to identify issues with the regenerator system in order to direct future work and also to clarify the potential advantage of pursuing this technology. A reduced order model of a regenerator is implemented into a cycle model of an sCO2 Brayton cycle. An economic analysis investigates the cost savings that is possible by switching from recuperative heat exchangers to switched-bed regenerators. The cost of the regenerators was estimated using the amount of material required if the pressure vessel is sized using ASME Boiler Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) requirements. The cost of the associated valves is found to be substantial for the regenerator system and is estimated in collaboration with an industrial valve supplier. The result of this analysis suggests that a 21.2% reduction in the contribution to the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCoE) from the power block can be realized by switching to a regenerator-based system.

Research Organization:
Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
EE0007120
OSTI ID:
1434935
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1549315
Journal Information:
Applied Energy, Vol. 208, Issue C; ISSN 0306-2619
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 39 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (9)

Dry-Cooled Supercritical CO 2 Power for Advanced Nuclear Reactors journal August 2014
Design Considerations for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycles With Recompression journal July 2014
Multiscale Transient Thermal, Hydraulic, and Mechanical Analysis Methodology of a Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger Using an Effective Porous Media Approach journal October 2013
Heat Transfer of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide in Printed Circuit Heat Exchanger Geometries journal August 2011
Nusselt number correlations for a microchannel heat exchanger hot water supplier with S-shaped fins journal November 2009
Printed circuit heat exchanger thermal–hydraulic performance in supercritical CO2 experimental loop journal August 2006
Determination of adequate regenerator for a Gamma-type Stirling engine journal February 2015
Parameter sensitivity analysis of duplex Stirling coolers journal March 2017
Models for Predicting the Performance of Brayton-Cycle Engines
  • Korakianitis, Theodosios; Wilson, David Gordon
  • ASME 1992 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Volume 2: Aircraft Engine; Marine; Microturbines and Small Turbomachinery https://doi.org/10.1115/92-GT-361
conference March 2015