skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Fully coupled two-phase flow and poromechanics modeling of coalbed methane recovery: Impact of geomechanics on production rate

Journal Article · · Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [2];  [3];  [4]
  1. China Univ. of Mining and Technology, Jiangsu (China); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  2. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  3. China Univ. of Mining and Technology, Jiangsu (China)
  4. Shandong Univ. of Science and Technology, Shandong (China)

This study presents the development and application of a fully coupled two-phase (methane and water) flow, transport, and poromechanics num erical model for the analysis of geomechanical impacts on coalbed methane (CBM) production. The model considers changes in two-phase fluid flow properties, i.e., coal porosity, permeability, water retention, and relative permeability curves through changes in cleat fractures induced by effective stress variations and desorption-induced shrinkage. The coupled simulator is first verified for poromechanics coupling, and simulation parameters of a CBM reservoir model are calibrated by history matching against one year of CBM production field data from Shanxi Province, China. Then, the verified simulator and the calibrated CBM reservoir model are used for predicting the impact of geomechanics on the production rate for twenty years of continuous CBM production. The simulation results show that desorption-induced shrinkage is the dominant process in increasing permeability in the near wellbore region. Away from the wellbore, desorption-induced shrinkage is weaker, and permeability is reduced by pressure depletion and increased effective stress. A sensitivity analysis shows that for coal with a higher sorption strain, a larger initial Young's modulus and a smaller Poisson's ratio promote the enhancement of permeability as well as an increased production rate. Moreover, the conceptual model of the cleat system, whether dominated by vertical cleats with permeability correlated to horizontal stress or with permeability correlated to mean stress, can have a significant impact on the predicted production rate. Overall, the study clearly demonstrates and confirms the critical importance of considering geomechanics for an accurate prediction of CBM production.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE), Clean Coal and Carbon (FE-20); USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1379925
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1550145
Journal Information:
Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, Vol. 45, Issue C; ISSN 1875-5100
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 65 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (33)

Assessment of shrinkage–swelling influences in coal seams using rank-dependent physical coal properties journal January 2009
Properties of Porous Media Affecting Fluid Flow journal June 1966
An improved relative permeability model for coal reservoirs journal April 2013
Impact of Various Parameters on the Production of Coalbed Methane journal June 2013
Predicting Sorption-Induced Strain and Permeability Increase With Depletion for Coalbed-Methane Reservoirs journal October 2009
Incorporating Geomechanical and Dynamic Hydraulic-Fracture-Property Changes Into Rate-Transient Analysis: Example From the Haynesville Shale journal August 2013
Relative permeability of CBM reservoirs: Controls on curve shape journal December 2011
Coupled flow and geomechanical processes during gas production from coal seams journal July 2009
Coupled flow and geomechanical processes during enhanced coal seam methane recovery through CO2 sequestration journal January 2009
Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams journal September 2005
Two Phase Relative Permeability of Gas and Water in Coal for Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery and CO2 Storage journal January 2013
Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 1-The Physical Process of Gas Storage and Movement in Coal Seams journal February 1987
Dynamic permeability and porosity evolution of coal seam rich in CBM based on the flow-solid coupling theory journal April 2017
Comparison of numerical simulators for greenhouse gas storage in coalbeds, part IV: History match of field micropilot test data book January 2005
Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids journal December 1941
Flow-Testing Coalbed Methane Production Wells in the Presence of Water and Gas journal December 1987
Coalbed methane: A review journal November 2012
How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model journal December 1998
A theoretical model for gas adsorption-induced coal swelling journal March 2007
Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation(includes associated paper 6988 ) journal June 1978
Coalbed Methane Parametric Study: What's Really Important to Production and When? conference October 2003
Thermohydromechanics of partially saturated geological media: governing equations and formulation of four finite element models journal January 2001
A Multicomponent, Two-Phase-Flow Model for CO2 Storage and Enhanced Coalbed-Methane Recovery journal March 2009
Relative permeabilities of gas and water for different rank coals journal May 2011
Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery journal July 2004
CO 2 Storage in Deep Unminable Coal Seams journal May 2005
A Closed-form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils1 journal January 1980
Effects of non-Darcy flow on the performance of coal seam gas wells journal April 2012
A Fully Coupled Multiphase Multicomponent Flow and Geomechanics Model for Enhanced Coalbed-Methane Recovery and CO2 Storage journal April 2013
Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in Coal with Enhanced Coalbed Methane RecoveryA Review journal May 2005
A dynamic prediction model for gas–water effective permeability based on coalbed methane production data journal January 2014
A fully coupled multiphase flow and geomechanics solver for highly heterogeneous porous media journal November 2014
History matching and production prediction of a horizontal coalbed methane well journal October 2012

Cited By (4)

Numerical study on enhancing coalbed methane recovery by injecting N 2 /CO 2 mixtures and its geological significance journal April 2020
Experimental study of the influences of water injections on CBM exploitation journal July 2019
A dynamic evaluation technique for assessing gas output from coal seams during commingling production within a coalbed methane well: a case study from the Qinshui Basin journal January 2020
A Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical Coupling Model and Its Application in Acid Fracturing Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery Simulation journal February 2019