Analysis of Energy-Efficiency Opportunities for the Pulp and Paper Industry in China

View Technical Report

Citation Formats

• MLA
• APA
• Chicago
• BibTeX

Kong, Lingbo, Hasanbeigi, Ali, Price, Lynn, and Liu, Huanbin. Analysis of Energy-Efficiency Opportunities for the Pulp and Paper Industry in China. United States: N. p., 2013. Web. doi:10.2172/1172119.

Kong, Lingbo, Hasanbeigi, Ali, Price, Lynn, & Liu, Huanbin. Analysis of Energy-Efficiency Opportunities for the Pulp and Paper Industry in China. United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/1172119

Kong, Lingbo, Hasanbeigi, Ali, Price, Lynn, and Liu, Huanbin. 2013. "Analysis of Energy-Efficiency Opportunities for the Pulp and Paper Industry in China". United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/1172119. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1172119.

@article{osti_1172119,
title = {Analysis of Energy-Efficiency Opportunities for the Pulp and Paper Industry in China},
author = {Kong, Lingbo and Hasanbeigi, Ali and Price, Lynn and Liu, Huanbin},
abstractNote = {This study assesses the impact of 23 energy-efficiency measures that could be applied in China's pulp and paper industry. We analyze the fuel- and electricity-efficiency improvement potential of these technologies for the year 2010 using a bottom-up conservation supply curve (CSC) model. The fuel CSC model shows that the cost-effective fuel efficiency improvement potential for China's pulp and paper industry is 179.6 PJ, and the total technical fuel-savings potential is 254.3 PJ. These figures represent 26.8 percent and 38.0 percent, respectively, of total fuel used in China’s pulp and paper industry in 2010. The CO2 emissions reduction potential associated with ii the cost-effective fuel savings is 16.9 Mt CO2, and the total technical potential for CO2 emissions reduction is 24.2 Mt CO2. The electricity CSC model shows that the total technical electricity-efficiency potential to 2,316 gigawatt-hours (GWh) or 4.3 percent of total electricity use in the pulp and paper industry in 2010. All of the electricity-efficiency potential is cost effective. The CO2 emissions reduction potential associated with the total electricity savings is 1.8 Mt CO2. Sensitivity analyses for adoption rate, discount rate, electricity and fuel prices, investment costs, and the energy savings from each measure show that these parameters have significant influence on the results. Therefore, the results presented in this report should be interpreted with caution.},
doi = {10.2172/1172119},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1172119}, journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Jan 31 00:00:00 EST 2013},
month = {Thu Jan 31 00:00:00 EST 2013}
}

• Facebook
• Twitter
• LinkedIn
• Email

You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.

Print

• Research Organization: Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE; Energy Foundation (United States). China Sustainable Energy Program
• Contributing Organization: South China Univ. of Technology, Guangzhou (China)
• DOE Contract Number: AC02-05CH11231
• OSTI ID: 1172119
• Report Number(s): LBNL-6107E
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION