LANL Skid Testing Summary
Abstract
Our improved understanding of the processes occurring during complex drop / skid events has explained the previously observed scatter in skid and drop test data, and provided new insights into effective mitigation strategies. However, it has been perceived to undermine our current safety assumptions, which is inaccurate. We have no reason to believe that our safety margin from HEVR (the event of concern) is any different to that previously assumed – we just have a much better experimental and theoretical basis by which to measure it more accurately. Until this work is complete or, at least, more mature, we cannot draw any conclusions on whether we are more or less safe than we thought, but we know that use of cushioned surfaces, along with sensible housekeeping, mitigates the potential activation of the skid-grit mechanism.
- Authors:
-
- Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1127479
- Report Number(s):
- LA-UR-14-22410
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC52-06NA25396
- Resource Type:
- Technical Report
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 36 MATERIALS SCIENCE; Friction; explosive
Citation Formats
Dickson, Peter. LANL Skid Testing Summary. United States: N. p., 2014.
Web. doi:10.2172/1127479.
Dickson, Peter. LANL Skid Testing Summary. United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/1127479
Dickson, Peter. 2014.
"LANL Skid Testing Summary". United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/1127479. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1127479.
@article{osti_1127479,
title = {LANL Skid Testing Summary},
author = {Dickson, Peter},
abstractNote = {Our improved understanding of the processes occurring during complex drop / skid events has explained the previously observed scatter in skid and drop test data, and provided new insights into effective mitigation strategies. However, it has been perceived to undermine our current safety assumptions, which is inaccurate. We have no reason to believe that our safety margin from HEVR (the event of concern) is any different to that previously assumed – we just have a much better experimental and theoretical basis by which to measure it more accurately. Until this work is complete or, at least, more mature, we cannot draw any conclusions on whether we are more or less safe than we thought, but we know that use of cushioned surfaces, along with sensible housekeeping, mitigates the potential activation of the skid-grit mechanism.},
doi = {10.2172/1127479},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1127479},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Apr 09 00:00:00 EDT 2014},
month = {Wed Apr 09 00:00:00 EDT 2014}
}