Lifecycle-analysis for heavy vehicles.
Abstract
Various alternative fuels and improved engine and vehicle systems have been proposed in order to reduce emissions and energy use associated with heavy vehicles (predominantly trucks). For example, oil companies have proposed improved methods for converting natural gas to zero-aromatics, zero-sulfur diesel fuel via the Fischer-Tropsch process. Major heavy-duty diesel engine companies are working on ways to simultaneously reduce particulate-matter and NOX emissions. The trend in heavy vehicles is toward use of lightweight materials, tires with lower rolling resistance, and treatments to reduce aerodynamic drag. In this paper, we compare the Mecycle energy use and emissions from trucks using selected alternatives, such as Fisher-Tropsch diesel fuel and advanced fuel-efficient engines. We consider heavy-duty, Class 8 tractor-semitrailer combinations for this analysis. The total life cycle includes production and recycling of the vehicle itself, extraction, processing, and transportation of the fuel itself, and vehicle operation and maintenance. Energy use is considered in toto, as well as those portions that are imported, domestic, and renewable. Emissions of interest include greenhouse gases and criteria pollutants. Angonne's Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model is used to generate per-vehicle fuel cycle impacts. Energy use and emissions for materials manufacturing and vehiclemore »
- Authors:
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Argonne National Lab., IL (US)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- US Department of Energy (US)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 10731
- Report Number(s):
- ANL/ES/CP-96075
TRN: US0103822
- DOE Contract Number:
- W-31109-ENG-38
- Resource Type:
- Conference
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: 91st Air and Waste Management Association Meeting and Exhibition, San Diego, CA (US), 06/14/1998--06/18/1998; Other Information: PBD: 16 Apr 1998
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS; 03 NATURAL GAS; 02 PETROLEUM; DIESEL ENGINES; DIESEL FUELS; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIFE-CYCLE COST; NATURAL GAS; FUEL SUBSTITUTION; WEIGHT; TRUCKS; ENERGY ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Citation Formats
Gaines, L. Lifecycle-analysis for heavy vehicles.. United States: N. p., 1998.
Web.
Gaines, L. Lifecycle-analysis for heavy vehicles.. United States.
Gaines, L. 1998.
"Lifecycle-analysis for heavy vehicles.". United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/10731.
@article{osti_10731,
title = {Lifecycle-analysis for heavy vehicles.},
author = {Gaines, L},
abstractNote = {Various alternative fuels and improved engine and vehicle systems have been proposed in order to reduce emissions and energy use associated with heavy vehicles (predominantly trucks). For example, oil companies have proposed improved methods for converting natural gas to zero-aromatics, zero-sulfur diesel fuel via the Fischer-Tropsch process. Major heavy-duty diesel engine companies are working on ways to simultaneously reduce particulate-matter and NOX emissions. The trend in heavy vehicles is toward use of lightweight materials, tires with lower rolling resistance, and treatments to reduce aerodynamic drag. In this paper, we compare the Mecycle energy use and emissions from trucks using selected alternatives, such as Fisher-Tropsch diesel fuel and advanced fuel-efficient engines. We consider heavy-duty, Class 8 tractor-semitrailer combinations for this analysis. The total life cycle includes production and recycling of the vehicle itself, extraction, processing, and transportation of the fuel itself, and vehicle operation and maintenance. Energy use is considered in toto, as well as those portions that are imported, domestic, and renewable. Emissions of interest include greenhouse gases and criteria pollutants. Angonne's Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model is used to generate per-vehicle fuel cycle impacts. Energy use and emissions for materials manufacturing and vehicle disposal are estimated by means of materials information from Argonne studies. We conclude that there are trade-offs among impacts. For example, the lowest fossil energy use does not necessarily result in lowest total energy use, and lower tailpipe emissions may not necessarily result in lower lifecycle emissions of all criteria pollutants.},
doi = {},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/10731},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Apr 16 00:00:00 EDT 1998},
month = {Thu Apr 16 00:00:00 EDT 1998}
}