skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Discovery as a process

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/10144535· OSTI ID:10144535

The three great myths, which form a sort of triumvirate of misunderstanding, are the Eureka! myth, the hypothesis myth, and the measurement myth. These myths are prevalent among scientists as well as among observers of science. The Eureka! myth asserts that discovery occurs as a flash of insight, and as such is not subject to investigation. This leads to the perception that discovery or deriving a hypothesis is a moment or event rather than a process. Events are singular and not subject to description. The hypothesis myth asserts that proper science is motivated by testing hypotheses, and that if something is not experimentally testable then it is not scientific. This myth leads to absurd posturing by some workers conducting empirical descriptive studies, who dress up their study with a ``hypothesis`` to obtain funding or get it published. Methods papers are often rejected because they do not address a specific scientific problem. The fact is that many of the great breakthroughs in silence involve methods and not hypotheses or arise from largely descriptive studies. Those captured by this myth also try to block funding for those developing methods. The third myth is the measurement myth, which holds that determining what to measure is straightforward, so one doesn`t need a lot of introspection to do science. As one ecologist put it to me ``Don`t give me any of that philosophy junk, just let me out in the field. I know what to measure.`` These myths lead to difficulties for scientists who must face peer review to obtain funding and to get published. These myths also inhibit the study of science as a process. Finally, these myths inhibit creativity and suppress innovation. In this paper I first explore these myths in more detail and then propose a new model of discovery that opens the supposedly miraculous process of discovery to doser scrutiny.

Research Organization:
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)
DOE Contract Number:
W-31109-ENG-38
OSTI ID:
10144535
Report Number(s):
ANL/ER/PP-77507; ON: DE94010468
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: [1994]
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Comments on Reservoir Technology, DOE PR VII, San Francisco, March 23, 1989
Conference · Tue Mar 21 00:00:00 EST 1989 · OSTI ID:10144535

Mapping scientific frontiers : the quest for knowledge visualization.
Journal Article · Fri Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2003 · Proposed for publication in DLIB Magazine. · OSTI ID:10144535

Ecotoxicology in Wonderland: Myths and misconceptions
Conference · Sun Dec 31 00:00:00 EST 1995 · OSTI ID:10144535