4,087 Search Results

The paper focuses on introducing the approach and method applied for decommissioning of the V1 nuclear power plant (further the 'V1 NPP') located in Jaslovske Bohunice in the Slovak Republic, to the conference participants. The Paper outlines activities and steps necessary to comply with the requirements contained in the decision of the Slovak government from 1999 regarding the early shutdown of the V1 NPP. The company responsible for the V1 NPP decommissioning is Jadrova a vyradovacia spolocnost, a.s., (further JAVYS) with the State as a sole shareholder. On the basis of the V1 NPP Decommissioning Conceptual Plan, out of four assessed options, JAVYS selected the immediate decommissioning option (the 'IDO') for the V1 NPP. On the basis of multi-criteria analysis, the IDO specified the approach of immediate and continuous dismantling of equipment followed by demolition of buildings and preparation of the site for its further potential use. The IDO also included the summary of technical, environmental, legislative information as well as the determination of assumed costs for decommissioning of the V1 NPP. Prior to commencement of the V1 NPP decommissioning, within the process of termination of operation, activities connected with de-fuelling, monitoring, processing of historical waste and, not to forget, the process of obtaining the license for the V1 NPP decommissioning were executed. JAVYS decided to divide the decommissioning process into two stages. In 2011, JAVYS obtained a license for the first stage of the V1 NPP decommissioning. Within this stage, dismantling of inactive equipment, demolitions of inactive buildings, monitoring of systems and preparatory works for the upcoming stage of decommissioning were implemented. In 2015, in line with the license for the 2. stage of the V1 NPP decommissioning, the activities of decontamination and dismantling of contaminated and active equipment as well as demolitions of remaining buildings began. In this stage radioactive waste (RAW) produced during the decommissioning is to be processed. After decontamination, the material fulfilling the free release criteria is to be released into the environment, the site is to be cleared from the scope of the Atomic Act and released from the surveillance of the national regulators. Future application of certain methods and techniques for decontamination and dismantling in similar environments might bring an added value to the operators. Paper includes a description of best practices for Nuclear Power Plant VVER type reactors decommissioning. Schedule comparison is given to show how the critical path of certain projects is being managed. Application of the International Standard for Decommissioning Costing (ISDC) methodology provides a uniform method which enables comparison of cost estimates to other nuclear facilities under decommissioning. The cost estimate for the V1 NPP decommissioning has been continuously updated based on more advanced and detailed information on the decommissioning activities and projects. Monitoring of progress of the V1 NPP decommissioning is performed via four key-performance indicators. The Earned Value Management (EVM) methodology is used for evaluating time and cost aspect of decommissioning activities while waste conditioning index is calculated by comparing the actually produced waste to planned values of waste for a respective monitored period. Radiological safety index is assessed by comparison of the personnel records on the individual yearly doses received by each respective employee to the boundary value. (authors)

Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants is an increasing reality in many countries with nuclear power. Already many years before final shutdown, planning of the decommissioning work is usually started in order to understand for example the costs, waste volume capacity and licensing work needed. In many countries it is required to have a final decommissioning plan before any decommissioning work is allowed to start. Westinghouse has been involved in international decommissioning planning for more than 30 years, where the first 20 years was mostly funding and preliminary plans due to that decommissioning was many years away. However, as many more plants are now moving into decommissioning, the focus has shifted to final decommissioning plans with budgets instead of funding plans, strategic decisions instead of choices, waste volume specifications instead of estimates and a defined approach instead of what ifs. Westinghouse has developed a methodology based on the planning and execution of many decommissioning projects in Europe, America and Asia. That international experience and understanding helps the customers to adopt a systematic planning process where strategy development is done with the end state in mind, where the goals are clearly outlined and the starting point described. The process and steps to reach the desired end state need to be clearly defined and all options/alternatives evaluated from a cost/benefit point of view. This is followed by a thorough and quantitative risk analysis in order to give solid recommendations and credible conclusions. One important feedback has been that real decommissioning experience from reference projects is invaluable for an efficient and timely progress in order not to spend unnecessary time and effort on understanding the barriers and links between different activities in decommissioning. Skilled project managers or engineers can drive the project forward, but without decommissioning experience previously gained, valuable lessons learned are not used and the same mistakes can be made again. Many utilities have invested in knowledge transfer from other decommissioning projects through site visits, exchange programs and supplier meetings, which is a valuable asset and way of implementing lessons learned from performed decommissioning projects into the planning process. (authors)

The current legal framework in Belgium foresees the progressive phase out of nuclear power between October 2022 (Doel 3) and December 2025 (Doel 2). Upon its definitive shutdown, each unit of the Tihange and Doel sites will enter a Post-Operational Phase (POP) and be prepared for its Decontamination and Decommissioning (D and D). Prior to obtaining the D and D license, the Operator Electrabel is legally required to remove any non-fissile irradiated core items stored in the deactivation pools. The non-fissile irradiated core items consist essentially of control rods, poison rods and source thimbles as well as thimble plugs and foreign materials irradiated during operation: - Their significant content in highly radiant radionuclides (up to 6 TBq of Co-60 per kg of irradiated material) renders all existing operational waste management processes inadequate due to insufficient biological shielding; - Their high concentrations in long-lived radionuclides call for their disposal in a geological repository for which no final design nor waste acceptance criteria are expected prior to 2050. Uncertainties in the Belgian energy supply and security, however, require the Operator to be prepared for a partial nuclear phase out, where one or more units would benefit from lifetime extension while the remaining units would undergo decommissioning. The present paper aims at presenting how Electrabel, in partnership with Tractebel, addressed this challenge by maximizing the use of synergies within the respective sites as well as between both sites themselves, all the while accounting for site specificities. The most recent results and state of progress of the project will be detailed and the first lessons learned will be shared. The project has been split in multiple tasks and phased as follows: - An inventory phase aimed at mapping the contents, origin, composition and history of the non-fissile irradiated core items; - A pre-characterization phase based on neutron activation models; - A waste sorting phase aimed at separating waste forms for which an evacuation route exists from those for which such route does not exist; - A feasibility phase aimed at exploring all possible scenarios for the management of non-fissile irradiated core items and identifying the optimal feasible solution for each site; - A preparation phase (currently ongoing), developing further the optimal solution and ensuring that back-up solutions are available for any foreseeable change of context (licensing issue, modification in the nuclear phase-out program, etc.) and initiating early contacts with potential subcontractors for segmentation works and cask manufacturers, as well as the Belgian regulatory body and waste management agency. This phase also foresees the investigation of destructive and non-destructive radiological measurements to support the detailed characterization of the waste forms; - A realization phase (future work). (authors)

With two consolidated interim storage facilities for used nuclear fuel (UNF) having applied for storage licenses, there is the potential need to transport UNF in the U.S. from shutdown reactor sites to complete the site cleanup and from operating reactor sites who may be running out of storage options (e.g., spent fuel pools are nearly full and dry storage facilities are reaching licensed capacity). At some of the shutdown reactor sites, only the independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) exists and often there remains a degraded transportation infrastructure for performing shipments from these sites. At other sites (e.g., operating reactor plants), the existing transportation infrastructure on the site is unchanged and sufficient for moving UNF, but the environment around the route may have changed (e.g., what was once a rural setting has transformed into a more urban setting) and/or local stakeholders want their input taken into consideration in UNF transportation activities. So, although preliminary evaluations have been performed to identify viable modes of transport from these sites using rail, barge, and/or heavy haul truck, if multiple options exist for moving the UNF from the site (e.g., multiple truck routes or a truck and a barge route both exist) then an evaluation that takes input from multiple stakeholders should be considered to identified the preference (e.g., ranking) of routes from a site. Orano has supported the development of several studies examining the viable routes for removing UNF from some of these sites and has utilized a multi-attribute utility analysis (MUA) to establish a ranking of routes and associated modes to move the UNF from the ISFSIs to a Class I rail carrier. The ultimate result from the MUA is a list(s) of the most to the least favored/preferred routes from the site. This paper provides an overview of the MUA methodology and provides an example of its application to a site with a shutdown reactor. (authors)

The paper focuses on packaging of dismantled and fragmented reactor components into containers and their transport to their storage and/or disposal facility within the immediate dismantling strategy applied on decommissioning of nuclear power plant (NPP) finally shutdown after standard operation. The main purpose of the paper is to present the process of design, manufacture, testing and use of new transport and storage containers for activated intermediate level waste (ILW) from V1 NPP decommissioning at Jaslovske Bohunice site. Legislation conditions, container selection process, requirements on their design and manufacture, scope of associated licensing documentation and technical procedures applied up to their use on site are described in detail. (authors)

In the summer of 2018, Cyclife, the EDF group's specialist radioactive waste management and decommissioning company, transported sixteen gas ducts and associated equipment from the shutdown Chapelcross nuclear power plant to treatment facilities in the UK and Sweden. The client requested a full removal, treatment and disposal service for approximately 820 te of low level metallic waste comprising Upper Gas Duct Assemblies (including bellows), Upper Gas Duct elbows, Filter Pots and Convoluted pipework. The complex scope involved heavy lifting, transport by road and sea, processing and recycling on a large scale, thereby necessitating involvement of a wide range of suppliers at different tiers all managed by Cyclife. The purpose of the entire project was to safely handle and treat all of the components for clearance and recycling into the public domain for the manufacture of new steel products. Most of the treatment took place in Cyclife's nuclear licensed metal treatment facility in Sweden. Cyclife has a long and unique experience of arranging safe transport of large contaminated components on road and sea. The metal treatment facility in Sweden can, without special arrangements, receive components up to 30 meters long with a weight of up to 400 tonnes for decontamination, size reduction and melting. The actual treatment of the components consisted of the following steps: a) Separation of a gas duct from the gantry, b) size reduction, radiological verification measurements and clearance of the gantry, c) stepwise segmentation of the gas duct and elbow including removal of asbestos, d) decontamination, e) melting, f) radiological assessment and clearance of the metal ingots, g) management of the secondary waste for return to UK. The result of the project, upon completed treatment of all the material, demonstrates a high recycling rate of the material. 5-10% of the original mass of material will have to disposed as radioactive waste. This number include all residues, untreatable material (asbestos, mineral wool, filters etc.) and two melt batches with a too high activity content for clearance. The paper takes the reader through the entire project from the initial planning to the clearance of the metal and the return of the secondary waste to UK for disposal. It will also present and discuss pros and cons for alternative management approaches in several perspectives. (authors)

This is a technical paper that does not take into account the contractual limitations under the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (Standard Contract) (10 CFR Part 961). Under the provisions of the Standard Contract, DOE does not consider spent nuclear fuel in multi-assembly canisters to be an acceptable waste form, absent a mutually agreed to contract amendment. To the extent discussions or recommendations in this paper conflict with the provisions of the Standard Contract, the Standard Contract provisions prevail. The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Integrated Waste Management (DOE-IWM) continues to conduct evaluations of removing spent nuclear fuel (SNF) from shutdown nuclear power plant sites. The 14 shutdown sites included in the evaluation to date have nuclear power reactors that have been permanently shut down and the sites have been decommissioned or are undergoing decommissioning. The 14 shutdown sites are Maine Yankee, Yankee Rowe, Connecticut Yankee, Humboldt Bay, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Trojan, La Crosse, Zion, Crystal River, Kewaunee, San Onofre, Vermont Yankee, and Fort Calhoun. The Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ceased operations in September 2018 and will be included in future evaluations. A key part of the shutdown site evaluations are visits to the sites. These site visits typically take place over 3 days. The first day is spent at the nuclear power plant site. The second day is spent evaluating the near-site transportation infrastructure, including rail infrastructure, potential heavy-haul routes, and potential rail and barge transload locations. The third day is often spent meeting with community engagement or advisory panels. External engagement activities during site visits are conducted in two areas. The first area involves inviting tribal and state representatives, State Regional Group (SRG) representatives, and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) representatives to participate in the entire site visit. The SRG representatives are from the Southern States Energy Board, the Western Interstate Energy Board, the Council of State Governments - Midwest, or the Council of State Governments - Eastern Regional Conference, according to the location of the nuclear power plant. State representatives typically represent their state department of energy, state department of environmental or natural resources, State Rail Safety Participation Program, state police, state department of transportation, radiation protection organization, or emergency management organization. Tribal representatives explore issues associated with cultural affiliation and tribal involvement with past and present site activities. As the regulator of the U.S. railroads, the FRA representatives bring unique experience to the site visits. They also coordinate meetings with the railroads that serve the shutdown sites. The second area of external engagement activities during site visits involves meeting with local community engagement or advisory panels. Meeting with local community engagement or advisory panels provides an opportunity to inform these panels on DOE activities and the roles and responsibilities of federal agencies during site decommissioning. (authors)

The National Research Universal Reactor (NRU) was commissioned in 1957. The NRU was fundamental for the development of the Candu reactors and, until 2016, quietly responsible for producing 40 percent of the world's supply of medical isotopes for diagnosis and cancer therapy. The Government of Canada decided in 2015 to discontinue operation as of March 31, 2018 due to challenges associated with running a 60-year old nuclear reactor. Anticipating this closing date allowed the Permanent Safe Shutdown Project (PSSP) to transition the NRU from an operating reactor to a state suitable for Storage with Surveillance. One of the biggest challenges to address was human resource management, which was rightly identified as the key to keeping the project within schedule and budget. The dilemma was, how to keep the work force motivated to contribute with the preparation of the shutdown while addressing job security concerns. This paper summarises Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) challenges and strategies to secure specialized subject matter experts, trades and operators for planning and executing the NRU reactor shutdown Project. The discussion also includes the solutions and lessons learned to date. (author)

Following 30 years in a safe shutdown state, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) is proposing the final decommissioning of the Nuclear Power Demonstration Waste Facility (NPDWF). A Postclosure Safety Assessment (PostSA) has been prepared as part of this process. The present PostSA represents the second assessment, following an iterative approach. The PostSA considered Normal Evolution of the facility, as well as several Disruptive Events and other cases to show robustness and account for uncertainties. The results of the PostSA show that the NPDWF is a robust design that will contain and limit release of contaminants long into the future. (authors)

Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) has over 30 years of experience managing three prototype power reactors from shutdown through storage with surveillance and into preparation from final decommissioning. CNL is responsible for the safe storage with surveillance of three prototype power reactors; Nuclear Power Demonstration (NPD), Gentilly-1(G1) and Douglas Point (DP). Each of the Canadian prototype power reactor sites have been maintained using different post shutdown management strategies, which were based on the site location, configuration, and intended designation of the respective sites. This paper will discuss the post shutdown strategies employed at the three sites, including details of their shutdown strategy, current conditions, and experience gained from the period of storage with surveillance. (author)