Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
  1. Event-Type Identification in Power Grids Using a Spectral Correlation Function-Aided Convolutional Neural Network

    Rapid and accurate identification of events in power grids is critical to ensuring system reliability and security. This study introduces a novel event-type identification method, utilizing a Spectral Correlation Function (SCF)-aided Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The proposed method employs a six-stage cascaded structure consisting of: (1) data collection, (2) clipping, (3) augmentation, (4) feature extraction (FE), (5) training, and (6) testing. Real-world power grid signals sourced from the Grid Event Signature Library are used for both training and testing. To improve robustness, additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is introduced at various signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels to augment the dataset. The SCF-based FE method captures distinctive event-type characteristics by exploiting the spectral correlation of signals, allowing the CNN architecture to effectively learn and generalize event patterns. The proposed method is benchmarked against seven conventional techniques, using real-world power grid signals representing four distinct event types: blown fuse, line switching, low amplitude arcing, and transformer energization. Key performance metrics-prediction accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrix—are employed to evaluate the performance. Results demonstrate that the SCF-CNN method outperforms traditional approaches across all metrics and SNR levels, achieving over 99% prediction accuracy and nearly zero error for SNR values above 6 dB. This signifies its efficacy in reliable event-type identification for power grid applications.

  2. Power Grab: Exploring Grid Enhancing Technologies (GETs) Maximum Reliable Transmission

    Power Grab: Exploring Grid Enhancing Technologies (GETs) Maximum Reliable Transmission CNEE Webinar

  3. Probabilistic Restoration Modeling of Wide-Area Power Outage

    The timely restoration of electricity services following extreme weather events is crucial to meet customer energy resilience as well as for the economic and national security of the United States. Electricity restoration plans are needed to monitor multi-state power restoration operations, undertake resource planning, and analyze system vulnerabilities. However, these plans are proprietary to utility companies and not readily available to first responders and decision-makers. The purpose of the Restoration of Power Outage from Wide-area Severe Weather Disruptions (RePOWERD) project was to (i) determine which type of model – empirical, statistical, or probabilistic-most accurately predicts restoration times for distribution-level power outages caused by Category 2 or higher hurricanes, and (ii) identify the impact on restoration times of various predictor variables, such as power outage impact (i.e., customers impacted), storm characteristics, land-use patterns, and baseline customer density at county-service-area resolution. Seven models were developed for hurricanes that made landfalls from 2017 - 2022 along the Southeast region of the United States (Irma, Michael, Harvey, Laura, and Zeta). Comparing methods for predicting the time to restore power to 95 % of impacted customers for these hurricanes revealed that: 1) outage magnitude (i.e., initial number of customers experiencing outages and their spatial distributions) is the strongest predictor of recovery time; 2) the performance of the log-linear regression model was similar to more complex, less interpretable models (e.g., accelerated failure time); and 3) the final log-linear regression model achieved strong overall performance, but it struggled with certain hurricanes (overall adjusted R2 of 0.6730, with a minimum of 0.4006 for Harvey and maximum of 0.8636 for Zeta). Using the log-linear regression model to forecast restoration time is viable, as all input data are publicly available prior to or at storm onset; however, the model reliability would benefit from expanding the scope of predictors and training data.

  4. Energy Scheduling-based Operating Envelopes including a Distribution System Branch Screening Algorithm

    This paper presents an energy scheduling-based formulation for computing operating envelopes including a distribution branch screening algorithm, termed DBS-ES. The contribution of the paper is two-fold: firstly, it presents an innovative methodology for calculating operating envelopes using energy scheduling (baseline), and secondly, it enhances this methodology by incorporating a custom distribution branch screening algorithm (DBS-ES). The custom algorithm leverages power system knowledge to reduce both model build time and total processing time while maintaining the same scheduling results as the baseline. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated through experiments on the IEEE13, IEEE123, and EPRI Secondary test feeders. Results highlight a 24.5% decrease in model build time and an 8.17% decrease in total processing time when using DBS-ES compared to the baseline, specifically for the IEEE123 test feeder. Additionally, the paper briefly discusses the influence of utility-controlled storage on computing operating envelopes, noting a general incre

  5. EV Charging Infrastructure Energization An Overview of Approaches for Simplifying and Accelerating Timelines to Processing EV Charging Load Service Requests

    The United States has seen significant growth in electric vehicle (EV) adoption, leading to increased demand for EV charging infrastructure. Over the past decade, EV charging infrastructure site developers, site hosts, and electric distribution utilities have navigated the process to integrate chargers onto the electric grid. Site developers and site hosts have raised the alarm that the integration process for high-powered EV charging projects does not meet the needs of the EV market for timeliness or cost. High-powered charging stations typically require a load service request or an agreement with the local utility to connect to the grid. The process of energizing a new high-powered charging site can be complex and time-consuming, often taking up to 2 years. This timeline is the result of current utility energization processes having been designed for construction projects that take longer to build (i.e., buildings). The specific challenges stem from various factors, including compartmentalization in application processes, the integration of EV charging process approvals with other distributed energy resources (DERs), and the need to ensure grid reliability. The energization process needs to evolve to meet the growing demand for high-powered EV charging. This white paper compiles information gathered through various conversations with key stakeholders, including utilities, utility regulators, EV charging operators, site developers, and authorities having jurisdiction (AHJ) as well as through an extensive literature review. This document identifies the challenges and provides potential solutions to streamline the process of connecting EV charging infrastructure to the power grid in the United States, serving as a starting point for future conversations around these solutions. The solutions noted in this white paper require collaborative efforts among utilities, regulators, and EV charging infrastructure developers to streamline the grid connection process for EV charging infrastructure. They are broadly organized into four areas: 1. Increase data access and transparency: Develop automated load service request tools, integrate hosting capacity and load service request analyses, incorporate EV adoption forecasts, and provide transparency on the processing queue. 2. Improve energization processes and timing: Create fast-track options based on prescreening criteria, provide flexibility or phased approvals in the load service request/interconnection process, build internal knowledge within utilities about EV charging technologies, and provide standardized workforce training. 3. Promote economic efficiency: Right size distribution components to accurately reflect the load requirements of EV charging infrastructure, make proactive investments in grid infrastructure based on EV adoption forecasts and growth projections, and consider energy equity and environmental justice factors such as equitable access to EV charging when planning infrastructure. 4. Improve grid reliability and resilience: Use load management/power control systems (PCS) at EV charging stations, adopt and implement harmonized standards for communication protocols and information models between the EV charging and grid control infrastructure, and address cybersecurity considerations by implementing robust security measures and standards for EV charging infrastructure—with particular emphasis on clarifying the security requirements for the interface to the grid. The objective of the solutions proposed in this white paper is to accelerate the timeline and decrease costs associated with connecting EV charging infrastructure to the grid. Electric utilities, utility regulators, EV charging infrastructure developers, and site hosts will first need to understand which solutions are available in their service territory, and if warranted, which combination of solutions would support their specific needs. Through the successful implementations of solutions at scale detailed here, industry will demonstrate a new and innovative ecosystem where timely deployment and energization of EV charging infrastructure with greater grid resiliency and reliability is a reality.

  6. The Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska: Advancing Clean, Resilient, and Sovereign Energy (Summary Report of Communities LEAP Activities)

    The Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska (ITKN) is a federally recognized Native American Tribe located along the Missouri River on the border of northeast Kansas and southeastern Nebraska. There are over 800 residents (Tribal citizens and non-Tribal) who live on the reservation, as well as more than 500 people who visit or work on the reservation on a daily basis. The ITKN faces many energy challenges, including rising service costs and dozens of power outages annually that impact resident well-being and business activities on Tribal lands. Power service issues are made more challenging by the remoteness of the reservation, which is 20 miles from the nearest town. Despite this, the ITKN has a long history of cultural and economic resilience: Local self-reliance, environmental stewardship, respecting the carrying capacity of the land, and strengthening the community are Tribal communities' traditional strengths. Long-term energy goals for the ITKN are centered around achieving energy sovereignty. Priority actions include: (1) Establishing a Tribal Utility Authority (TUA) to promote social welfare and community development.; (2) Deploying renewable community microgrids with ground-mount solar arrays and sustainable energy storage systems to advance energy sovereignty, resilience, and reliability. To advance these goals, the ITKN partnered with the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Communities LEAP (Local Energy Action Program) pilot. From August 2022 to March 2024, the ITKN community coalition collaborated with technical assistance providers at DOE's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and Sandia National Laboratories to evaluate TUA planning needs and microgrid deployment scenarios. This final report details the Communities LEAP technical assistance process, models and analysis performed, and results.

  7. Electric Grid and Markets 101 [Slides]

    This presentation covers aspects of operating the bulk power system with a focus on the regulatory levels of the US grid at a pretty introductory level. It was meant ot help inform a request from USDA for a "101" presentation that spoke to how electricity markets, contracting and regulation interact with the engineering and physics of operating the bulk power system. They are presently moving to being able to more directly fund PPAs or other non-co-op owned assets for member co-ops, is my understanding.

  8. Clean Energy Cybersecurity Accelerator: Cohort 2 - Asimily Public Report

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response (CESER) sponsors the Clean Energy Cybersecurity Accelerator (TM) (CECA) to expedite the deployment of emerging security technologies that address the most urgent security concerns facing modern and future electric grids. CECA Cohort 2 assessed solutions focused on hidden risks due to incomplete system visibility and device security and configuration. Improving visibility can be achieved through operational technology (OT) asset identification solutions, including capabilities like automatic discovery, vulnerability reporting, and configuration monitoring. Solutions that monitor and identify assets in information technology (IT) networks in other domains are widely used; however, there is far less adoption of monitoring solutions for operational technology environments. Wider adoption may increase with increased confidence in the ability for these solutions to understand and respond to the specific requirements of OT environments. CECA Cohort 2 evaluated the active and passive asset discovery capabilities of market-ready solutions, documented and analyzed results, and identified gaps in functionality or capabilities. This report and describes how these results can help advance the adoption of these and similar solutions in the electric sector.

  9. Scalability of Real-time Distribution Models

    This work will focus on developing the capabilities and validating the models for a sub transmission network with multiple feeders and microgrids. To achieve this scale of Hardware-in-the-loop (HitL) simulation, it is necessary to federate and collaborate. The work aims to design the large-scale feeder models to allow federation with complementary testbeds in the future. The feeder would be designed to be reconfigurable to put the system into a variety of modes. Aggregators models will be included in each distribution network’s federate to take control actions and interact with the management systems. Lastly, the feeder model will support large scale resilience studies involving complex Distributed Energy Resources (DER) controls, microgrid studies and emulation of complex data flows in future grid architectures.

  10. Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) Study for Vernon County, Wisconsin [Slides]

    Viroqua is a town in Wisconsin with a population of approximately 4,500. The Vernon County Energy district is a local nonprofit in Viroqua that provides energy education, individualized energy consulting and coaching to residents and businesses. They have a very good relationship with our county government and wish to support their efforts. The Vernon County government is currently working on a comprehensive plan and would like to include planning for electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure in the plan. They are seeking guidance on logical phases for implementation and identifying the best locations for Level 2 and Level 3 EV chargers. NREL provided technical input on strategic planning for electric vehicle (EV) adoption and electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) expansion in Vernon County through the Clean Energy to Communities (C2C) Expert Match technical assistance program. NREL provided strategic planning support for EV expansion planning in Vernon County and siting considerations for locating EVSE.


Search for:
All Records
Subject
24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION

Refine by:
Resource Type
Availability
Publication Date
  • 1948: 1 results
  • 1949: 0 results
  • 1950: 0 results
  • 1951: 0 results
  • 1952: 0 results
  • 1953: 0 results
  • 1954: 0 results
  • 1955: 2 results
  • 1956: 1 results
  • 1957: 0 results
  • 1958: 0 results
  • 1959: 1 results
  • 1960: 25 results
  • 1961: 39 results
  • 1962: 17 results
  • 1963: 20 results
  • 1964: 45 results
  • 1965: 57 results
  • 1966: 104 results
  • 1967: 88 results
  • 1968: 44 results
  • 1969: 12 results
  • 1970: 14 results
  • 1971: 24 results
  • 1972: 31 results
  • 1973: 36 results
  • 1974: 108 results
  • 1975: 166 results
  • 1976: 266 results
  • 1977: 326 results
  • 1978: 294 results
  • 1979: 274 results
  • 1980: 397 results
  • 1981: 335 results
  • 1982: 531 results
  • 1983: 391 results
  • 1984: 231 results
  • 1985: 223 results
  • 1986: 178 results
  • 1987: 266 results
  • 1988: 417 results
  • 1989: 439 results
  • 1990: 791 results
  • 1991: 551 results
  • 1992: 830 results
  • 1993: 814 results
  • 1994: 1,130 results
  • 1995: 1,853 results
  • 1996: 1,339 results
  • 1997: 420 results
  • 1998: 195 results
  • 1999: 127 results
  • 2000: 107 results
  • 2001: 122 results
  • 2002: 129 results
  • 2003: 168 results
  • 2004: 162 results
  • 2005: 147 results
  • 2006: 124 results
  • 2007: 119 results
  • 2008: 138 results
  • 2009: 160 results
  • 2010: 202 results
  • 2011: 215 results
  • 2012: 201 results
  • 2013: 154 results
  • 2014: 195 results
  • 2015: 294 results
  • 2016: 333 results
  • 2017: 462 results
  • 2018: 491 results
  • 2019: 450 results
  • 2020: 454 results
  • 2021: 442 results
  • 2022: 452 results
  • 2023: 368 results
  • 2024: 273 results
  • 2025: 3 results
1948
2025
Author / Contributor
Research Organization