Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
  1. Energy Clusters Offshore: A Technology Feasibility Review

    Globally, governments, companies, and other organizations have committed to achieving net-zero emissions targets in the coming decades. To achieve decarbonization at the scale and pace required to meet these targets, future energy systems will need renewable energy to serve 100% of the existing direct electricity demand, support additional electrification, and decarbonize the wider economy. An energy cluster offshore (ECO) is a concept that seeks to meet this challenge by integrating and optimizing large-scale renewable electricity generation, storage, and fuel production technologies and pairing them with other complementary uses, such as carbon capture or water desalination. This research project explores the techno-economic feasibility of ECO concepts by taking a holistic view of complex, multidisciplinary hybrid plant designs while considering different configurations and objectives. We will outline the most promising technology combinations and configurations, their functional requirements, and opportunities for optimization.

  2. HERO WEC V1: Design and Experimental Data Collection Efforts

    The Hydraulic and Electric Reverse Osmosis Wave Energy Converter (HERO WEC) is a research platform aimed at developing a modular, small-scale wave-powered desalination system for remote and disaster-response applications. Funded by the Department of Energy (DOE)'s Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO), the project aims to advance wave-powered desalination by developing and testing a small-scale, modular wave energy converter (WEC). The insights gained from this project will help guide the design and development of larger-scale wave energy devices as well as the integration of marine energy and reverse osmosis (RO) desalination. The HERO WEC was initially developed to derisk the Waves to Water prize, enabling the staff to practice WEC deployment and recovery, while optimizing installation protocols ologies, aiming to advance the broader fields of marine energy and water treatment.

  3. UMass 2-Body WEC Techno-Economic Assessment

    The University of Massachusetts (UMass) is developing a 2-body wave energy converter (WEC) device that is converting mechanical power into electricity using a mechanical motion rectifier that allows the system to couple to a flywheel. UMass has completed numerical modeling, wave tank testing, and PTO sub-system testing and needed assistance in developing a techno-economic model to enable optimization of their topology, comparison to a generic heaving point absorber topology, and guide the next steps in their development efforts. The core objective was to develop a techno-economic approach and modeling tool that allows benchmarking of the two topologies across a wide range of scales to evaluate their respective competitiveness in different application spaces. This data includes the final report as well as a supporting spreadsheet containing the data produced for this report.

  4. Investigating the interactions between wakes and floating wind turbines using FAST.Farm

    As floating offshore wind progresses to commercial maturity, wake and array effects across a farm of floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) will become increasingly important. While wakes of land-based and bottom-fixed offshore wind turbines have been extensively studied, only recently has this topic become relevant for floating turbines. This work presents an investigation of the mutual interaction between the motions of floating wind turbines and wakes using FAST.Farm. While FAST.Farm has been extensively validated across a wide range of conditions, it has never been validated for FOWT applications. Hence, in the first part of this work, we validate FAST.Farm by comparing simulations of a single FOWT against high-fidelity results from large-eddy simulations available in the literature. The validation is based on wake meandering, mean wake deflection, and velocity deficit at different downstream locations. This validation showed that the original axisymmetric (polar) wake model of FAST.Farm overpredicts the vertical wake deflection induced by shaft tilt and floater pitch, while the new curled wake model is capable of properly capturing the vertical wake deflection. In the second part, we use FAST.Farm to analyze a small three-unit array of FOWTs with a spacing of 7 diameters across a wide range of environmental conditions. The same National Renewable Energy Laboratory 5 MW reference wind turbine atop the OC4-DeepCwind semisubmersible is adopted for the three FOWTs and for the validation against high-fidelity simulations. To assess the effect of the floating substructure, we compare the power production, tower-base moments, and blade-root moments obtained for the floating turbines with the results obtained in a fixed-bottom configuration. The main differences introduced by the floating substructure are the motions induced by the waves, the change in the natural frequencies of the tower caused by differences in the boundary condition at its base, and the larger vertical deflection of the wake deficit due to the mean pitch of the platform. The impact of these differences, as well as other minor effects, are analyzed in detail.

  5. Numerical Modeling and Optimization of the iProTech Pitching Inertial Pump (PIP) Wave Energy Converter (WEC) (Cooperative Research and Development Final Report, CRADA Number: CRD-22-22968)

    This work generated a first-of-its-kind automated workflow to couple time-domain simulations of wave energy converters written in one software language with a set of design generation and evaluation scripts written in another software language. This automated workflow used an existing optimization package to analyze the sensitivity of different design parameters on the power output of a specific WEC, iProTech’s Pitching Inertial Pump (PIP). Geometric, inertial, and power take-off variables were all varied and optimized to find values that produced the highest amount of power generated over varying wave conditions. The findings on these parameter sensitivity studies are used to inform future design iterations of the PIP WEC. Including more design variables in the optimizations will only increase computational run time and further software development is needed to analyze a larger optimization.

  6. Electricity Markets Design Challenge [Slides]

    Electricity markets are at a crossroads - join the U.S. Department of Energy and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory for an exclusive one-hour workshop where you'll engage directly with the project team and help shape the rules for a potential prize. This competition could redefine how electricity markets support renewables and storage resources and create innovative solutions for the challenges ahead. NREL has also issued a Request for Information (RFI) to gather feedback and gauge interest in this potential prize. Whether or not you attend the workshop, we encourage you to review the brief presentation and share your thoughts through the RFI.

  7. MADWEC Techno-Economic Analysis: Cooperative Research and Development Final Report

    The objective of this project was for the facility to conduct a techno-economic assessment of the Maximal Asymmetric Drag Wave Energy Converter (MADWEC), developed by the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (UMass Dartmouth), used for powering remote monitoring and AUV charging systems compared to other existing power supply options. The assessment estimates capital expenditures (CapEx), operational expenditures (OpEx), and power performance for 18 scenarios with the purpose of identifying key cost drivers, comparing total system cost, and comparing the power performance of the power supply options in terms of required installed capacity and estimated theoretical annual energy performance. The scenarios include two end-uses: (1) AUV charging and (2) offshore remote monitoring); three power sources: (1) MADWEC), (2) photovoltaic (PV) solar buoy, (3) and traditional battery swapping); and three locations; (1) nearshore, (2) far-offshore, and (3) high-latitude). In addition, other project goals included developing high level installation, operation, and maintenance plans for each scenario.

  8. High-dimensional control co-design of a wave energy converter with a novel pitch resonator power takeoff system

    Researchers are exploring adding wave energy converters to existing oceanographic buoys to provide a predictable source of renewable power. A ”pitch resonator” power take-off system has been developed that generates power using a geared flywheel system designed to match resonance with the pitching motion of the buoy. However, the novelty of the concept leaves researchers uncertain about various design aspects of the system. This work presents a novel design study of a pitch resonator to inform design decisions for an upcoming deployment of the system. The assessment uses control co-design via WecOptTool to optimize control trajectories for maximal electrical power production while varying five design parameters of the pitch resonator. Given the large search space of the problem, the control trajectories are optimized within a Monte Carlo analysis to identify optimal designs, followed by parameter sweeps around the optimum to identify trends between the design parameters. The gear ratio between the pitch resonator spring and flywheel are found to be the most sensitive design variables to power performance. Finally, the assessment also finds similar power generation for various sizes of resonator components, suggesting that correctly designing for optimal control trajectories at resonance is more critical to the design than component sizing.

  9. Laboratory Upgrade Point Absorber (LUPA) CAD Files

    The Laboratory Upgrade Point Absorber (LUPA) is an open-source wave energy converter designed and tested by Oregon State University. The computer-aided design (CAD) files are provided here in two forms: the original SOLIDWORKS (2021) model as "LUPA SOLIDWORKS.zip" and as a STEP file "LUPA-A1000.step". The bill of materials is provided as an Excel file with assemblies (LUPA-Axxx), part numbers (LUPA-Axxx-Pyyy), part descriptions, manufacturers, and manufacturer part numbers. This comprehensive CAD model represents LUPA as it was deployed in Fall 2022 testing at the O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory. The mass properties including mass, center of gravity, and moments of inertia have been overridden for some parts and assemblies to match the physical device properties as determined from experiments. This appears as "overridden by user" when viewing mass properties in SOLIDWORKS. The LUPA-A1000.SLDASM file from the LUPA SOLIDWORKS.zip folder is the topmost assembly, open this file to see the entire model as one assembly. See "PMEC Page", "OpenEI Wiki Page", and the "Signature Project Page" resources below for more information on LUPA.

  10. Data Acquisition and Control for Marine Energy Devices: Cost Considerations

    This document discusses the process involved with developing a data acquisition system specifically in the context of applications for Marine Renewable Energy (MRE) technologies however, much of what is presented is applicable to applications requiring data acquisition in general. The detail on the process is provided to highlight the critical steps and needs for a successful measurement campaign and to understand what can impact the overall outcome, cost, and schedule. The process presented is an amalgamation of best practices, lessons learned, recommendations, and prudent technical project planning and management. Data acquisition systems may be tightly integrated with or into the device under measurement and it often has its own dependencies that must be met. Therefore, early consideration and planning for the data acquisition system are stressed throughout this document.


Search for:
All Records
Subject
16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER

Refine by:
Resource Type
Availability
Publication Date
  • 1945: 1 results
  • 1946: 1 results
  • 1947: 0 results
  • 1948: 1 results
  • 1949: 1 results
  • 1950: 0 results
  • 1951: 2 results
  • 1952: 0 results
  • 1953: 1 results
  • 1954: 0 results
  • 1955: 1 results
  • 1956: 0 results
  • 1957: 1 results
  • 1958: 2 results
  • 1959: 0 results
  • 1960: 2 results
  • 1961: 0 results
  • 1962: 1 results
  • 1963: 2 results
  • 1964: 2 results
  • 1965: 2 results
  • 1966: 4 results
  • 1967: 1 results
  • 1968: 0 results
  • 1969: 3 results
  • 1970: 2 results
  • 1971: 2 results
  • 1972: 3 results
  • 1973: 2 results
  • 1974: 18 results
  • 1975: 21 results
  • 1976: 28 results
  • 1977: 30 results
  • 1978: 38 results
  • 1979: 31 results
  • 1980: 51 results
  • 1981: 68 results
  • 1982: 51 results
  • 1983: 68 results
  • 1984: 32 results
  • 1985: 30 results
  • 1986: 25 results
  • 1987: 19 results
  • 1988: 10 results
  • 1989: 13 results
  • 1990: 5 results
  • 1991: 10 results
  • 1992: 4 results
  • 1993: 19 results
  • 1994: 19 results
  • 1995: 32 results
  • 1996: 18 results
  • 1997: 4 results
  • 1998: 3 results
  • 1999: 2 results
  • 2000: 1 results
  • 2001: 2 results
  • 2002: 1 results
  • 2003: 2 results
  • 2004: 5 results
  • 2005: 3 results
  • 2006: 2 results
  • 2007: 1 results
  • 2008: 2 results
  • 2009: 5 results
  • 2010: 22 results
  • 2011: 18 results
  • 2012: 37 results
  • 2013: 38 results
  • 2014: 44 results
  • 2015: 67 results
  • 2016: 138 results
  • 2017: 92 results
  • 2018: 71 results
  • 2019: 69 results
  • 2020: 77 results
  • 2021: 86 results
  • 2022: 83 results
  • 2023: 85 results
  • 2024: 73 results
  • 2025: 1 results
1945
2025
Author / Contributor
Research Organization