22 Search Results

Nearly 30% of commercial building energy use is wasted due to equipment faults and HVAC controls problems. The result is increased emissions, compromised comfort and productivity, and less reliable coordination of building power needs with a clean grid. The energy impact alone represents $17 billion in potential savings. Today’s smart building software provides a robust solution to address these operational deficiencies. Energy management and information systems (EMIS) are saving up to 9% on average, with two-year paybacks. They are being incorporated into energy management processes, commissioning services, and utility programs. As effective as they are, two barriers prevent even deeper benefits; limited personnel to fix problems once they are identified, and the expense and time to manually implement changes in control systems. In partnership with the research community, the EMIS industry is developing new capabilities to overcome these barriers. Moving beyond siloed products for either fault detection and diagnostics, or optimal control, these new capabilities empower users to not only automatically identify faults, but also to push corrective action, and control improvements to their buildings. In this paper, several areas for enhancements are documented: ‘one-time’ correction of faults such as setpoints, schedules, and economizer lockouts; short-term active testing for automated proportional integral derivative (PID) loop tuning and functional testing; and continuous supervisory control for demand flexibility and year-round efficiency. Results are presented from a pair of partner implementations out of a dozen providers integrating these enhancements into their products, including field tests from across the country, and insights into operator acceptance and integration into operations and maintenance practices.

To the urgent call for mitigating climate change, substantial initiatives have been undertaken to deploy grid-interactive heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) controls, such as model predictive control (MPC) for buildings. These efforts typically aim to curtail peak energy demand, shift load and enhance overall energy efficiency. With the recent development of low-cost MPC technologies that don’t require extensive instrumentation or manual modeling, small and medium commercial buildings (SMCBs), which rarely utilize advanced HVAC control systems, have become candidates for grid-interactive efficient buildings (GEBs). However, despite the potential benefits and maturity of the technology itself, several practical challenges remain in real-world implementation. In this paper, we share the practical challenges that we have encountered in implementing and testing three types of MPC solutions (ON/OFF unit, dualfuel, and VRF systems) on multiple SMCB sites. We describe the MPC deployment process and discuss the lessons learned. The site selection, eligibility, and retrofit availability (e.g., utility price structure, thermostat communications, etc.) are the main discussion points at the beginning of the project. Also, the modeling automation and the best practices for interacting with endusers and handling erroneous situations are presented for successful operations.

Traditional control sequences for HVAC systems in large commercial buildings have historically led to poor energy efficiency. To overcome this issue, ASHRAE has recently published Guideline 36 (G36), a collection of high-performance control sequences aimed at reducing energy consumption and cost for building owners. While these sequences are effective in increasing energy efficiency, their influence on a building's capacity to deliver demand flexibility remains uncertain. Prior research suggests a potential trade-off between energy efficiency and demand flexibility because permanently reducing energy use negatively impacts the available amount of load that can be reduced when responding to grid signals. To investigate this hypothesis, we created Modelica simulation models for an air handling unit with a G36 trim-and-respond sequence, calibrated these models to a fully instrumented experimental building testbed X1A in FLEXLAB, and simulated different demand flexibility scenarios. Counter to expectations, results show that, during a “shed event” with prior pre-cooling, G36 reduces demand by around 3.1 W/m2 more than the traditional control sequences, at the cost of a reduction in comfort (1.5 °C-hour/day) across five different cities across the United States. Our results provide encouraging evidence that, under the tested conditions, G36 does not decrease demand flexibility. This study should increase the confidence of building owners, designers, and operators who are looking to take advantage of demand flexibility programs while complying with increasingly stringent building energy efficiency standards.

As electrification and decarbonization goals become more commonplace across the country, the need for integrating thermal energy storage (TES) with HVAC to provide flexibility and load shifting is growing. Although there has been recent work related to the modeling and design of TES-integrated heat pump (HP) systems, investigation of generalized sizing and control methods for these systems remain limited. This paper details the development of generalized controls and sizing strategies applicable across different TES-integrated designs, two of which are discussed in this study. We demonstrate how model-based design enables an informed sizing and controls design process using the control-oriented Modelica language to generate high-fidelity models that accurately represent real-world behavior. We detail our development and testing of both heuristic and model predictive control (MPC) algorithms to determine the optimal charge and discharge schedule with dynamic varying utility prices. Experimental results show MPC provides operating costs reduction of nearly 20% for a minimum TES sizing scenario. In addition, we provide a generalized and intuitive control algorithm with near-optimal performance to control HP + TES systems and test its performance in simulation. This generalized control algorithm is also used to drive the results of our cost analysis, providing insights for engineers designing new TES-integrated HVAC systems. The cost analysis demonstrates the tradeoff between higher initial hardware costs from larger equipment and the resulting operational cost benefits, and enables a cost-effective sizing method which is applicable to any system. The paper concludes with design recommendations for new integrated HP-TES control systems in buildings.

Interest in automated building analytics, including fault detection and diagnostics has been increasing; however, developers of these solutions have lacked access to ground-truth-validated data across a wide range of weather conditions for algorithm development and performance assessment. This study presents the development, and validation of faulted and fault-free models for air handling units (AHUs) – a common HVAC system design. Detailed models for the single-duct AHU (Modelica) and dual-duct AHU (HVACSIM+) were used to conduct annual simulations, for common sensor, mechanical, and control sequence faults. We report lessons learned during the efforts, including challenges and insights regarding how these simulation models, typically used for design applications, can be purposed to accurately reflect real-world system operational behaviours. Finally, we highlight considerations for researchers and FDD developers who may wish to leverage this dataset to assess the performance of their algorithms, and evolving performance of FDD solutions over time.

As new algorithms incorporate occupancy count information into more sophisticated HVAC control, these technologies offer great potential for reductions in energy costs while enhancing flexibility. This study presents results from a two-year field evaluation of an occupancy-based HVAC control system installed in an office building. Two wings on each of the building’s 2–11 floors were equipped with occupancy counters to learn occupancy patterns. In combination with proprietary machine learning algorithms and thermal modeling, the occupancy data were leveraged to implement optimized start, early closure, and adjustments to fan operation at the air handling unit (AHU) level. This study conducted a holistic evaluation of technical performance, cost-effectiveness analysis, and user satisfaction. Results show the platform reduced weekday AHU run times by 2 h and 35 min per AHU per day during the pandemic time period. Simulation shows that 6.1% annual whole-building savings can be achieved when the building is fully occupied. The results are compared with prior studies, and potential drivers are discussed for future opportunities. The assessment results shed light on the expected in-the-field performance for researchers and industry stakeholders and enabled practical considerations as the technology strives to move beyond research-grade pilot trials into product-grade deployment.

Control applications that facilitate Demand Flexibility (DF) are difficult to deploy at scale in existing buildings. The heterogeneity of systems and non-standard naming conventions for metadata describing data points in building automation systems often lead to ad-hoc and building-specific applications. In recent years, several researchers investigated semantic models to describe the meaning of building data. They suggest that these models can enhance the deployment of building applications, enabling data exchanges among heterogeneous sources and their portability across different buildings. However, the studies in question fail to explore these capabilities in the context of controls. This paper proposes a novel semantics-driven framework for developing and deploying portable DF control applications. The design of the framework leverages an iterative design science research methodology, evolving from evidence gathered through simulation and field demonstrations. The framework aims to decouple control applications from specific buildings and control platforms, enabling these control applications to be configured semi-automatically. This allows application developers and researchers to streamline the onboarding of new applications that could otherwise be time-consuming and resource-intensive. The framework has been validated for its capability to facilitate the deployment of control applications sharing the same codebase across diverse virtual and real buildings. The demonstration successfully tested two controls for load shifting and shedding in four virtual buildings using the Building Optimization Testing Framework (BOPTEST) and in one real building using the control platform VOLTTRON. Insights into the current limitations, benefits, and challenges of generalizable controls and semantic models are derived from the deployment efforts and outcomes to guide future research in this field.

DFLEXLIBS is a library/repository of HVAC-based demand flexibility control applications developed using Python. The library is based on portable control applications that exclusively contain control logic and are abstract to building details, such as point names and communication protocols. The library leverages semantic models and control platform-oriented interfaces to configure and run the controls in specific buildings. To date, the library contains two applications and two interfaces (for BOPTEST and VOLTTRON) and has been demonstrated in five heterogeneous buildings.

The U.S. Department of Energy’s National Roadmap for Grid-interactive Efficient Buildings (GEB) acknowledged that building demand flexibility (DF) is both an important strategy to decarbonizing the buildings sector and an important resource for meeting the changing needs of the electrical grid such as improving grid reliability. However, understanding the complexity and uncertainties in real building field performance of DF strategies is a large gap hindering stakeholders on both grid and buildings side to make investments on deploying such strategies. The research work in this report intended to advance understanding of the variability and influential factors in building demand flexibility. Adding such knowledge based on lab testing results and measured performance data from real buildings is an important contribution. The report uses standardized metrics and methods to quantify DF performance from field-measured DF datasets of two significant building groups of big-box retail and medium office buildings to present the challenge of building DF variability in multiple dimensions. The report presents findings related to how several key factors influence building demand flexibility from implementing a common, cost-effective DF control strategy (i.e., adjusting zone temperatures). The findings are supported by full-scale lab testing, field data analysis and simulation research. The authors also provided application-oriented recommendations to stakeholders such as building aggregators, utility program design professionals, sophisticated building portfolio owners, and more.

As energy management and information systems (e.g., automated fault detection and diagnostics [AFDD] tools) become more prevalent in the commercial building stock, it is important to determine the effectiveness of these technologies by benchmarking their performance. The authors have been working to develop the largest publicly available dataset of HVAC fault datasets for performance benchmarking applications, covering the most common HVAC systems and designs including chiller plants, rooftop packaged units, dual duct air handling unit and single duct air handling units. This study covers the development, modeling, and validation of a synthetic fault dataset for the air handling unit (AHU), one of the most common HVAC configurations found in the commercial building stock. Despite this being a common system, real-world time series data are scarce and usually do not span a wide range of weather conditions. Due to this limitation, two detailed AHU models, which included the single duct AHU and dual duct AHU developed in the Modelica language and HVACSIM+ were employed to carry out annual simulations of numerous common sensor faults, mechanical faults, and control sequence faults. The fault inclusive data were then validated by comparing fault effects on system performance to expected symptoms. We summarize the nature of each fault and their impacts under different weather and operation conditions. We report some lessons learnt during the efforts of validating the high volumes of the FDD data sets. Finally, we highlight considerations for FDD developers that may want to use this dataset to assess their algorithms’ performance and their improvement over time.