skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Experiment vs. theory on electric inhibition of fast electron penetration of targets

Abstract

A dominant force of inhibition of fast electrons in normal density matter is due to an axially directed electrostatic field. Fast electrons leave the critical density layer and enter the solid in an assumed relativistic Maxwellian energy distribution. Within a cycle of the solid density plasma frequency, the charge separation is neutralized by a background return current density j{sub b} = en{sub b}v{sub b} equal and opposite to the fast electron current density j{sub f} = en{sub f}v{sub f} [1] where it is assumed that the fast electron number density is much less than the background number density, n{sub f} << n{sub b} [2]. This charge and current neutralization allows the forward moving fast electron current to temporarily exceed the Alfven limit by many orders of magnitude [3]. During this period the cold return current, in passing through the material resistivity, ohmically generates an electric field in opposition to the fast current. As a result, the fast electron current loses its energy to the material, via the return current, in the form of heat [4]. So, although the highly energetic electrons suffer relatively little direct collisional loss of energy (owing to the inverse relation of the Coulomb cross section tomore » velocity), their motion is substantially damped by ohmic heating of the slower return current. The equation for the ohmically generated electric field, E, is given by Ohm's law, E = j{sub c}{eta} where {eta} is the material resistivity.« less

Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
877827
Report Number(s):
UCRL-CONF-213157
TRN: US0601704
DOE Contract Number:  
W-7405-ENG-48
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Presented at: 32nd EPS Plasma Physics conference, tarragona, Spain, Jun 27 - Jul 01, 2005
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; 72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS; CROSS SECTIONS; CURRENT DENSITY; ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTRONS; ELECTROSTATICS; ENERGY SPECTRA; HEATING; LANGMUIR FREQUENCY; PHYSICS; PLASMA; TAIL ELECTRONS; TARGETS; VELOCITY

Citation Formats

Freeman, R R, Akli, K U, Batani, D, Baton, S, Hatchett, S P, Hey, D, Key, M H, King, J A, MacKinnon, A J, Norreys, P A, Snavely, R A, Stephens, R, Stoeckl, C, Town, R J, and Zhang, B. Experiment vs. theory on electric inhibition of fast electron penetration of targets. United States: N. p., 2005. Web.
Freeman, R R, Akli, K U, Batani, D, Baton, S, Hatchett, S P, Hey, D, Key, M H, King, J A, MacKinnon, A J, Norreys, P A, Snavely, R A, Stephens, R, Stoeckl, C, Town, R J, & Zhang, B. Experiment vs. theory on electric inhibition of fast electron penetration of targets. United States.
Freeman, R R, Akli, K U, Batani, D, Baton, S, Hatchett, S P, Hey, D, Key, M H, King, J A, MacKinnon, A J, Norreys, P A, Snavely, R A, Stephens, R, Stoeckl, C, Town, R J, and Zhang, B. 2005. "Experiment vs. theory on electric inhibition of fast electron penetration of targets". United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/877827.
@article{osti_877827,
title = {Experiment vs. theory on electric inhibition of fast electron penetration of targets},
author = {Freeman, R R and Akli, K U and Batani, D and Baton, S and Hatchett, S P and Hey, D and Key, M H and King, J A and MacKinnon, A J and Norreys, P A and Snavely, R A and Stephens, R and Stoeckl, C and Town, R J and Zhang, B},
abstractNote = {A dominant force of inhibition of fast electrons in normal density matter is due to an axially directed electrostatic field. Fast electrons leave the critical density layer and enter the solid in an assumed relativistic Maxwellian energy distribution. Within a cycle of the solid density plasma frequency, the charge separation is neutralized by a background return current density j{sub b} = en{sub b}v{sub b} equal and opposite to the fast electron current density j{sub f} = en{sub f}v{sub f} [1] where it is assumed that the fast electron number density is much less than the background number density, n{sub f} << n{sub b} [2]. This charge and current neutralization allows the forward moving fast electron current to temporarily exceed the Alfven limit by many orders of magnitude [3]. During this period the cold return current, in passing through the material resistivity, ohmically generates an electric field in opposition to the fast current. As a result, the fast electron current loses its energy to the material, via the return current, in the form of heat [4]. So, although the highly energetic electrons suffer relatively little direct collisional loss of energy (owing to the inverse relation of the Coulomb cross section to velocity), their motion is substantially damped by ohmic heating of the slower return current. The equation for the ohmically generated electric field, E, is given by Ohm's law, E = j{sub c}{eta} where {eta} is the material resistivity.},
doi = {},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/877827}, journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Jun 13 00:00:00 EDT 2005},
month = {Mon Jun 13 00:00:00 EDT 2005}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share: