A synthesis of environmental and recreational mitigation requirements at hydropower projects in the United States
Abstract
Environmental mitigation plays an important role in the environmentally sustainable development of hydropower resources. However, comprehensive data on mitigation required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) at United States (US) hydropower projects is lacking. Therefore, our objective was to create a comprehensive database of mitigation required at non-federal hydropower projects and provide a synthesis of available mitigation data. Mitigation data was collated for over 300 plants licensed or relicensed from 1998 through 2013. We observed that the majority of FERC mitigation requirements deal with either hydrologic flows or recreation and that hydropower plants in the Pacific Northwest had the highest number of requirements. Our data indicate opportunities exist to further explore hydropower mitigation in the areas of environmental flows, fish passage, and water quality. Lastly, connecting these data with ecological outcomes, actual flow data, and larger landscape level information will be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation and ultimately inform regulators, managers, and planners.
- Authors:
-
- Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Environmental Sciences Division
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Wind and Water Technologies Office (EE-4W)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1324045
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1325308
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC05-00OR22725
- Resource Type:
- Journal Article: Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Environmental Science and Policy
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 61; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 1462-9011
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 13 HYDRO ENERGY; environmental mitigation; FERC; hydropower; hydropower policy; environmental flows
Citation Formats
Schramm, Michael P., Bevelhimer, Mark S., and DeRolph, Chris R. A synthesis of environmental and recreational mitigation requirements at hydropower projects in the United States. United States: N. p., 2016.
Web. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.019.
Schramm, Michael P., Bevelhimer, Mark S., & DeRolph, Chris R. A synthesis of environmental and recreational mitigation requirements at hydropower projects in the United States. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.019
Schramm, Michael P., Bevelhimer, Mark S., and DeRolph, Chris R. 2016.
"A synthesis of environmental and recreational mitigation requirements at hydropower projects in the United States". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.019. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1324045.
@article{osti_1324045,
title = {A synthesis of environmental and recreational mitigation requirements at hydropower projects in the United States},
author = {Schramm, Michael P. and Bevelhimer, Mark S. and DeRolph, Chris R.},
abstractNote = {Environmental mitigation plays an important role in the environmentally sustainable development of hydropower resources. However, comprehensive data on mitigation required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) at United States (US) hydropower projects is lacking. Therefore, our objective was to create a comprehensive database of mitigation required at non-federal hydropower projects and provide a synthesis of available mitigation data. Mitigation data was collated for over 300 plants licensed or relicensed from 1998 through 2013. We observed that the majority of FERC mitigation requirements deal with either hydrologic flows or recreation and that hydropower plants in the Pacific Northwest had the highest number of requirements. Our data indicate opportunities exist to further explore hydropower mitigation in the areas of environmental flows, fish passage, and water quality. Lastly, connecting these data with ecological outcomes, actual flow data, and larger landscape level information will be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation and ultimately inform regulators, managers, and planners.},
doi = {10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.019},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1324045},
journal = {Environmental Science and Policy},
issn = {1462-9011},
number = C,
volume = 61,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Apr 11 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Mon Apr 11 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Estimating the Size and Impact of the Ecological Restoration Economy
journal, June 2015
- BenDor, Todd; Lester, T. William; Livengood, Avery
- PLOS ONE, Vol. 10, Issue 6
ECOLOGY: Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts
journal, April 2005
- Bernhardt, E. S.
- Science, Vol. 308, Issue 5722
Nationwide Assessment of Nonpoint Source Threats to Water Quality
journal, February 2012
- Brown, Thomas C.; Froemke, Pamela
- BioScience, Vol. 62, Issue 2
Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective
journal, July 2009
- Brown, Philip H.; Tullos, Desiree; Tilt, Bryan
- Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 90
An Index of Cumulative Disturbance to River Fish Habitats of the Conterminous United States from Landscape Anthropogenic Activities
journal, March 2011
- Esselman, P. C.; Infante, D. M.; Wang, L.
- Ecological Restoration, Vol. 29, Issue 1-2
How Run-of-River Operation Affects Hydropower Generation and Value
journal, September 2007
- Jager, Henriette I.; Bevelhimer, Mark S.
- Environmental Management, Vol. 40, Issue 6
Sustainable reservoir operation: can we generate hydropower and preserve ecosystem values?
journal, January 2008
- Jager, Henriette I.; Smith, Brennan T.
- River Research and Applications, Vol. 24, Issue 3
Balancing Environmental Protection and Energy Production in the Federal Hydropower Licensing Process
journal, June 2010
- Kosnik, L.
- Land Economics, Vol. 86, Issue 3
Implications of Dam Obstruction for Global Freshwater Fish Diversity
journal, June 2012
- Liermann, Catherine Reidy; Nilsson, Christer; Robertson, James
- BioScience, Vol. 62, Issue 6
Threats and opportunities for freshwater conservation under future land use change scenarios in the United States
journal, October 2013
- Martinuzzi, Sebastián; Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R.; Pracheil, Brenda M.
- Global Change Biology, Vol. 20, Issue 1
A Multi-scale Spatial Approach to Address Environmental Effects of Small Hydropower Development
journal, September 2014
- McManamay, Ryan A.; Samu, Nicole; Kao, Shih-Chieh
- Environmental Management, Vol. 55, Issue 1
Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of the World's Large River Systems
journal, April 2005
- Nilsson, C.
- Science, Vol. 308, Issue 5720
A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency: Effectiveness of fish passage facilities
journal, November 2011
- Noonan, Michael J.; Grant, James W. A.; Jackson, Christopher D.
- Fish and Fisheries, Vol. 13, Issue 4
Fluvial processes and vegetation — Glimpses of the past, the present, and perhaps the future
journal, April 2010
- Osterkamp, W. R.; Hupp, C. R.
- Geomorphology, Vol. 116, Issue 3-4
The Natural Flow Regime
journal, December 1997
- Poff, N. LeRoy; Allan, J. David; Bain, Mark B.
- BioScience, Vol. 47, Issue 11
Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications
journal, March 2007
- Poff, N. L.; Olden, J. D.; Merritt, D. M.
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, Issue 14
Managing for Variability to Sustain Freshwater Ecosystems
journal, January 2009
- Poff, N. LeRoy
- Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 135, Issue 1
A Presumptive Standard for Environmental flow Protection: Presumptive Standard for Environmental flow Protection
journal, March 2011
- Richter, B. D.; Davis, M. M.; Apse, C.
- River Research and Applications, Vol. 28, Issue 8
Re-thinking environmental flows: from allocations and reserves to sustainability boundaries: RE-THINKING ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS
journal, September 2009
- Richter, Brian D.
- River Research and Applications, Vol. 26, Issue 8
Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions
journal, March 2010
- Roscoe, David W.; Hinch, Scott G.
- Fish and Fisheries, Vol. 11, Issue 1
Developing fish passage and protection at hydropower dams
journal, May 2007
- Schilt, Carl R.
- Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Vol. 104, Issue 3-4
Patterns of fish Passage in the Upper Mississippi River: fish Passage in the Upper Mississippi River
journal, August 2013
- Tripp, S.; Brooks, R.; Herzog, D.
- River Research and Applications, Vol. 30, Issue 8
Hydropower projects: a review of most effective mitigation measures
journal, November 2002
- Trussart, Serge; Messier, Danielle; Roquet, Vincent
- Energy Policy, Vol. 30, Issue 14
Power-generation system vulnerability and adaptation to changes in climate and water resources
journal, January 2016
- van Vliet, Michelle T. H.; Wiberg, David; Leduc, Sylvain
- Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 4
Hydropower Relicensing and Climate Change1: Hydropower Relicensing and Climate Change
journal, March 2011
- Viers, Joshua H.
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 47, Issue 4
Hydropower-related pulsed-flow impacts on stream fishes: a brief review, conceptual model, knowledge gaps, and research needs
journal, April 2011
- Young, Paciencia S.; Cech, Joseph J.; Thompson, Lisa C.
- Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, Vol. 21, Issue 4
Works referencing / citing this record:
Integrating Economic and Ecological Benchmarking for a Sustainable Development of Hydropower
journal, August 2016
- Hirsch, Philipp; Schillinger, Moritz; Appoloni, Katharina
- Sustainability, Vol. 8, Issue 9
Integrating Economic and Ecological Benchmarking for a Sustainable Development of Hydropower
text, January 2016
- Hirsch, Philipp Emanuel; Schillinger, Moritz; Appoloni, Katharina
- Mary Ann Liebert