skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Kelvin equation and self-consistent nucleation theory

Abstract

Issues of self-consistency are reviewed for several unary equilibrium size distributions based on the capillarity approximation. Some apparent difficulties of interpretation are resolved. In terms of the kinetic approach to nucleation theory, the influence of self-consistency on the nucleation rate is shown to arise entirely from differences in the dimer evaporation rates for nearly all versions of classical theory. The nucleation rate behavior of the Kelvin model is explored. In this model, the Kelvin equation is used to prescribe all cluster evaporation rates. Nucleation rates predicted by the Kelvin model are quantitatively similar to those of the self-consistent classical (SCC) theory, but not to other simple versions of the classical theory. This behavior arises entirely from the relatively close coincidence of the SCC and Kelvin dimer evaporation rates. This means that, for the distribution-based versions of classical theory, the SCC model is the closest analogue of the Kelvin model. Because the Kelvin equation is fundamentally inadequate for very small clusters, the close relationship between the Kelvin and SCC formulations indicates that both are equally lacking in fundamental justification. The Kelvin model may, however, have some pragmatic utility, and a simple analytical rate expression is also derived for it to simplifymore » the calculation of nucleation rates for this model. {copyright} {ital 1995} {ital American} {ital Institute} {ital of} {ital Physics}.« less

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore California 94551-9900 (United States)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
69055
DOE Contract Number:  
FG02-92ER14257; W-7405-ENG-48
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Chemical Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 103; Journal Issue: 3; Other Information: PBD: 15 Jul 1995
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
66 PHYSICS; NUCLEATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; EVAPORATION; KINETICS; MOLECULAR CLUSTERS; SIZE; THERMODYNAMICS; STATISTICAL MECHANICS

Citation Formats

Wilemski, G, and Physical Sciences Inc., Andover, Massachusetts 01810-1077. The Kelvin equation and self-consistent nucleation theory. United States: N. p., 1995. Web. doi:10.1063/1.469822.
Wilemski, G, & Physical Sciences Inc., Andover, Massachusetts 01810-1077. The Kelvin equation and self-consistent nucleation theory. United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469822
Wilemski, G, and Physical Sciences Inc., Andover, Massachusetts 01810-1077. 1995. "The Kelvin equation and self-consistent nucleation theory". United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469822.
@article{osti_69055,
title = {The Kelvin equation and self-consistent nucleation theory},
author = {Wilemski, G and Physical Sciences Inc., Andover, Massachusetts 01810-1077},
abstractNote = {Issues of self-consistency are reviewed for several unary equilibrium size distributions based on the capillarity approximation. Some apparent difficulties of interpretation are resolved. In terms of the kinetic approach to nucleation theory, the influence of self-consistency on the nucleation rate is shown to arise entirely from differences in the dimer evaporation rates for nearly all versions of classical theory. The nucleation rate behavior of the Kelvin model is explored. In this model, the Kelvin equation is used to prescribe all cluster evaporation rates. Nucleation rates predicted by the Kelvin model are quantitatively similar to those of the self-consistent classical (SCC) theory, but not to other simple versions of the classical theory. This behavior arises entirely from the relatively close coincidence of the SCC and Kelvin dimer evaporation rates. This means that, for the distribution-based versions of classical theory, the SCC model is the closest analogue of the Kelvin model. Because the Kelvin equation is fundamentally inadequate for very small clusters, the close relationship between the Kelvin and SCC formulations indicates that both are equally lacking in fundamental justification. The Kelvin model may, however, have some pragmatic utility, and a simple analytical rate expression is also derived for it to simplify the calculation of nucleation rates for this model. {copyright} {ital 1995} {ital American} {ital Institute} {ital of} {ital Physics}.},
doi = {10.1063/1.469822},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/69055}, journal = {Journal of Chemical Physics},
number = 3,
volume = 103,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 1995},
month = {Sat Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 1995}
}