Implications of the Montreal Protocol for atmospheric emissions of alternative chemicals. Report for January-March 1988
This paper is about alternative chemicals. The substitution, of less ozone-depleting chemicals wherever it is cost effective and technically feasible, is expected because of anticipated future limitations on production and consumption of the fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and halons (fluorocarbons containing bromine atoms) covered by the Montreal Protocol. Certain alternative chemicals (e.g., HCFC-22 and methyl chloroform) are already used in applications other than as CFC substitutes. Projected future consumption of alternative chemicals includes such non-substitution use. Study results indicate that the 50% reduction in weighted CFC/halon consumption (weighted for ozone-depletion potential) required by the Protocol in 1998 could initially be achieved by alternative chemicals alone. However, alternative processes or products not requiring either the controlled substances or their substitute chemicals and/or substantial recovery and reuse of the chemicals would be needed to maintain the 50% level of reduction in the longer term.
- Research Organization:
- Radian Corp., Austin, TX (USA)
- OSTI ID:
- 6760166
- Report Number(s):
- PB-88-238977/XAB
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Stratospheric ozone protection: The Montreal Protocol and Title VI of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Montreal Protocol meeting looks to speed up phaseout of ozone depleters
Related Subjects
29 ENERGY PLANNING
POLICY AND ECONOMY
HALOGENATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
OZONE
PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS
BROMINE
EMISSION
MATERIAL SUBSTITUTION
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
CONTROL
ELEMENTS
HALOGENS
NONMETALS
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ORGANIC HALOGEN COMPOUNDS
POLLUTION CONTROL
500600* - Environment
Atmospheric- Regulations- (-1989)
290300 - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment
Health
& Safety