skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparison of the UCB sulfur recovery process with conventional sulfur recovery technology for treating recycle gas from a crude oil residuum hydrotreater. [UCBSRP sulfur recovery process]

Conference ·
OSTI ID:5723885

The University of California, Berkeley, Sulfur Recovery Process (UCBSRP) is being developed as an alternative to conventional sulfur recovery technology for removing hydrogen sulfide from gas streams and converting it to elemental sulfur. In the UCBSRP the hydrogen sulfide is absorbed by a physical solvent and the resulting solution of H/sub 2/S is mixed with a stoichiometrically equivalent amount of slulfur dioxide dissolved in the same solvent. The reaction between the two sulfur compounds forms water, which is miscible with the solvent, and elemental sulfur, which crystallizes from solution when its solubility is exceeded. Part of the sulfur formed in the reaction is burned to make the SO/sub 2/ needed in the process, and the heat of combustion is recovered in a waste-heat boiler. Sulfur is recovered by cooling the solution, settling the additional crystals that form, and centrifuging the slurry pumped from the bottom of the crystallizer-surge tank. In this report the UCBSRP is compared to conventional technology for the case of the removal of H/sub 2/S from the recycle gas of a high-pressure petroleum residuum hydrotreater. The conventional technology selected for this comparison consists of an absorber/stripper operation using diethanol amine as the absorbent, a Claus sulfur plant, and a SCOT tail-gas treating unit. From this comparison it is estimated that the DFC for the UCBSRP would be about 61% of that for the conventional technology. The utility costs for this application of the UCBSRP are estimated to be less than the credit for the high-pressure steam produced whereas the utility costs for the conventional process are substantially more. 6 refs., 3 figs., 9 tabs.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley Lab., CA (USA); California Univ., Berkeley (USA). Dept. of Chemical Engineering
DOE Contract Number:
AC03-76SF00098
OSTI ID:
5723885
Report Number(s):
LBL-21574; CONF-860648-1; ON: DE86012014
Resource Relation:
Conference: 6. annual contractors' meeting on contaminant control in coal-derived gas streams, Morgantown, WV, USA, 4 Jun 1986; Other Information: Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

A comparison of the UCB sulfur recovery process with conventional sulfur recovery technology for treating recycle gas from a crude oil residuum hydrotreater
Conference · Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1986 · OSTI ID:5723885

HYBRID SULFUR RECOVERY PROCESS FOR NATURAL GAS UPGRADING
Technical Report · Tue Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 2004 · OSTI ID:5723885

Reactive absorption of H sub 2 S by a solution of SO sub 2 in polyglycol ether
Conference · Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1990 · Preprints of Papers, American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry; (USA) · OSTI ID:5723885