skip to main content

Title: Brachytherapy Improves Biochemical Failure–Free Survival in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Compared With Conventionally Fractionated External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Purpose: To compare, in a retrospective study, biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) and overall survival (OS) in low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients who received brachytherapy (BT) (either low-dose-rate brachytherapy [LDR-BT] or high-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiation therapy [HDR-BT+EBRT]) versus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone. Methods and Materials: Patient data were obtained from the ProCaRS database, which contains 7974 prostate cancer patients treated with primary radiation therapy at four Canadian cancer institutions from 1994 to 2010. Propensity score matching was used to obtain the following 3 matched cohorts with balanced baseline prognostic factors: (1) low-risk LDR-BT versus EBRT; (2) intermediate-risk LDR-BT versus EBRT; and (3) intermediate-risk HDR-BT+EBRT versus EBRT. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare differences in bFFS (primary endpoint) and OS in the 3 matched groups. Results: Propensity score matching created acceptable balance in the baseline prognostic factors in all matches. Final matches included 2 1:1 matches in the intermediate-risk cohorts, LDR-BT versus EBRT (total n=254) and HDR-BT+EBRT versus EBRT (total n=388), and one 4:1 match in the low-risk cohort (LDR-BT:EBRT, total n=400). Median follow-up ranged from 2.7 to 7.3 years for the 3 matched cohorts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that all BT treatment options were associatedmore » with statistically significant improvements in bFFS when compared with EBRT in all cohorts (intermediate-risk EBRT vs LDR-BT hazard ratio [HR] 4.58, P=.001; intermediate-risk EBRT vs HDR-BT+EBRT HR 2.08, P=.007; low-risk EBRT vs LDR-BT HR 2.90, P=.004). No significant difference in OS was found in all comparisons (intermediate-risk EBRT vs LDR-BT HR 1.27, P=.687; intermediate-risk EBRT vs HDR-BT+EBRT HR 1.55, P=.470; low-risk LDR-BT vs EBRT HR 1.41, P=.500). Conclusions: Propensity score matched analysis showed that BT options led to statistically significant improvements in bFFS in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patient populations.« less
Authors:
 [1] ;  [2] ;  [3] ; ;  [4] ;  [5] ;  [2] ;  [6] ;  [7] ;  [8] ;  [9] ;  [1] ;  [10]
  1. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario (Canada)
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada)
  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Kelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, British Columbia (Canada)
  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, L'Hotel Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, Quebec (Canada)
  5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec (Canada)
  6. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
  7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario (Canada)
  8. Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario (Canada)
  9. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario (Canada)
  10. (Canada)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
22458619
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics; Journal Volume: 91; Journal Issue: 3; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; BALANCES; BRACHYTHERAPY; CANADA; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DOSE RATES; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY; FAILURES; HAZARDS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENTS; POPULATIONS; PROSTATE