skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Interobserver Variability in Target Definition for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With and Without Portal Vein Thrombus: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Consensus Guidelines

Abstract

Purpose: Defining hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) gross tumor volume (GTV) requires multimodal imaging, acquired in different perfusion phases. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the variability in contouring and to establish guidelines and educational recommendations for reproducible HCC contouring for treatment planning. Methods and Materials: Anonymous, multiphasic planning computed tomography scans obtained from 3 patients with HCC were identified and distributed to a panel of 11 gastrointestinal radiation oncologists. Panelists were asked the number of HCC cases they treated in the past year. Case 1 had no vascular involvement, case 2 had extensive portal vein involvement, and case 3 had minor branched portal vein involvement. The agreement between the contoured total GTVs (primary + vascular GTV) was assessed using the generalized kappa statistic. Agreement interpretation was evaluated using Landis and Koch's interpretation of strength of agreement. The S95 contour, defined using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm consensus at the 95% confidence level, was created for each case. Results: Of the 11 panelists, 3 had treated >25 cases in the past year, 2 had treated 10 to 25 cases, 2 had treated 5 to 10 cases, 2 had treated 1 to 5 cases, 1 had treated 0 cases, and 1more » did not respond. Near perfect agreement was seen for case 1, and substantial agreement was seen for cases 2 and 3. For case 2, there was significant heterogeneity in the volume identified as tumor thrombus (range 0.58-40.45 cc). For case 3, 2 panelists did not include the branched portal vein thrombus, and 7 panelists contoured thrombus separately from the primary tumor, also showing significant heterogeneity in volume of tumor thrombus (range 4.52-34.27 cc). Conclusions: In a group of experts, excellent agreement was seen in contouring total GTV. Heterogeneity exists in the definition of portal vein thrombus that may impact treatment planning, especially if differential dosing is contemplated. Guidelines for HCC GTV contouring are recommended.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12];  [2];
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri (United States)
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (United States)
  3. Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital and Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)
  5. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (United States)
  6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (United States)
  7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University Medical College, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)
  8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (United States)
  9. Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (China)
  10. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan (United States)
  11. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (United States)
  12. Department of Radiation Oncology, Montreal General Hospital/McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec (Canada)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
22420366
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Journal Name:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 89; Journal Issue: 4; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2014 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); Journal ID: ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; HEPATOMAS; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; PATIENTS; PLANNING; RADIOTHERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; VEINS

Citation Formats

Hong, Theodore S., E-mail: tshong1@mgh.harvard.edu, Bosch, Walter R., Krishnan, Sunil, Kim, Tae K., Mamon, Harvey J., Shyn, Paul, Ben-Josef, Edgar, Seong, Jinsil, Haddock, Michael G., Cheng, Jason C., Feng, Mary U., Stephans, Kevin L., Roberge, David, Crane, Christopher, and others, and. Interobserver Variability in Target Definition for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With and Without Portal Vein Thrombus: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Consensus Guidelines. United States: N. p., 2014. Web. doi:10.1016/J.IJROBP.2014.03.041.
Hong, Theodore S., E-mail: tshong1@mgh.harvard.edu, Bosch, Walter R., Krishnan, Sunil, Kim, Tae K., Mamon, Harvey J., Shyn, Paul, Ben-Josef, Edgar, Seong, Jinsil, Haddock, Michael G., Cheng, Jason C., Feng, Mary U., Stephans, Kevin L., Roberge, David, Crane, Christopher, & others, and. Interobserver Variability in Target Definition for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With and Without Portal Vein Thrombus: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Consensus Guidelines. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJROBP.2014.03.041
Hong, Theodore S., E-mail: tshong1@mgh.harvard.edu, Bosch, Walter R., Krishnan, Sunil, Kim, Tae K., Mamon, Harvey J., Shyn, Paul, Ben-Josef, Edgar, Seong, Jinsil, Haddock, Michael G., Cheng, Jason C., Feng, Mary U., Stephans, Kevin L., Roberge, David, Crane, Christopher, and others, and. 2014. "Interobserver Variability in Target Definition for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With and Without Portal Vein Thrombus: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Consensus Guidelines". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJROBP.2014.03.041.
@article{osti_22420366,
title = {Interobserver Variability in Target Definition for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With and Without Portal Vein Thrombus: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Consensus Guidelines},
author = {Hong, Theodore S., E-mail: tshong1@mgh.harvard.edu and Bosch, Walter R. and Krishnan, Sunil and Kim, Tae K. and Mamon, Harvey J. and Shyn, Paul and Ben-Josef, Edgar and Seong, Jinsil and Haddock, Michael G. and Cheng, Jason C. and Feng, Mary U. and Stephans, Kevin L. and Roberge, David and Crane, Christopher and others, and},
abstractNote = {Purpose: Defining hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) gross tumor volume (GTV) requires multimodal imaging, acquired in different perfusion phases. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the variability in contouring and to establish guidelines and educational recommendations for reproducible HCC contouring for treatment planning. Methods and Materials: Anonymous, multiphasic planning computed tomography scans obtained from 3 patients with HCC were identified and distributed to a panel of 11 gastrointestinal radiation oncologists. Panelists were asked the number of HCC cases they treated in the past year. Case 1 had no vascular involvement, case 2 had extensive portal vein involvement, and case 3 had minor branched portal vein involvement. The agreement between the contoured total GTVs (primary + vascular GTV) was assessed using the generalized kappa statistic. Agreement interpretation was evaluated using Landis and Koch's interpretation of strength of agreement. The S95 contour, defined using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) algorithm consensus at the 95% confidence level, was created for each case. Results: Of the 11 panelists, 3 had treated >25 cases in the past year, 2 had treated 10 to 25 cases, 2 had treated 5 to 10 cases, 2 had treated 1 to 5 cases, 1 had treated 0 cases, and 1 did not respond. Near perfect agreement was seen for case 1, and substantial agreement was seen for cases 2 and 3. For case 2, there was significant heterogeneity in the volume identified as tumor thrombus (range 0.58-40.45 cc). For case 3, 2 panelists did not include the branched portal vein thrombus, and 7 panelists contoured thrombus separately from the primary tumor, also showing significant heterogeneity in volume of tumor thrombus (range 4.52-34.27 cc). Conclusions: In a group of experts, excellent agreement was seen in contouring total GTV. Heterogeneity exists in the definition of portal vein thrombus that may impact treatment planning, especially if differential dosing is contemplated. Guidelines for HCC GTV contouring are recommended.},
doi = {10.1016/J.IJROBP.2014.03.041},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22420366}, journal = {International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics},
issn = {0360-3016},
number = 4,
volume = 89,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2014},
month = {Tue Jul 15 00:00:00 EDT 2014}
}