skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: TU-C-17A-07: FusionARC Treatment with Adaptive Beam Selection Method

Journal Article · · Medical Physics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4889282· OSTI ID:22409679
 [1]; ;  [1];  [2]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (United States)
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University, Seoul (Korea, Republic of)

Purpose: Recently, a new treatment scheme, FusionARC, has been introduced to compensate for the pitfalls in single-arc VMAT planning. It basically allows for the static field treatment in selected locations, while the remaining is treated by single-rotational arc delivery. The important issue is how to choose the directions for static field treatment. This study presents an adaptive beam selection method to formulate fusionARC treatment scheme. Methods: The optimal plan for single-rotational arc treatment is obtained from two-step approach based on the reweighted total-variation (TV) minimization. To choose the directions for static field treatment with extra segments, a value of our proposed cost function at each field is computed on the new fluence-map, which adds an extra segment to the designated field location only. The cost function is defined as a summation of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) of all structures with the fluence-map, while assuming that the lower cost function value implies the enhancement of plan quality. Finally, the extra segments for static field treatment would be added to the selected directions with low cost function values. A prostate patient data was applied and evaluated with three different plans: conventional VMAT, fusionARC, and static IMRT. Results: The 7 field locations, corresponding to the lowest cost function values, are chosen to insert extra segment for step-and-shoot dose delivery. Our proposed fusionARC plan with the selected angles improves the dose sparing to the critical organs, relative to static IMRT and conventional VMAT plans. The dose conformity to the target is significantly enhanced at the small expense of treatment time, compared with VMAT plan. Its estimated treatment time, however, is still much faster than IMRT. Conclusion: The fusionARC treatment with adaptive beam selection method could improve the plan quality with insignificant damage in the treatment time, relative to the conventional VMAT.

OSTI ID:
22409679
Journal Information:
Medical Physics, Vol. 41, Issue 6; Other Information: (c) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0094-2405
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc
Journal Article · Tue Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2008 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22409679

Direct leaf trajectory optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning with sliding window delivery
Journal Article · Wed Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2014 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22409679

Direct leaf trajectory optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning with sliding window delivery
Journal Article · Wed Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2014 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:22409679