skip to main content

Title: MO-G-17A-06: Kernel Based Dosimetry for 90Y Microsphere Liver Therapy Using 90Y Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT

Purpose: 90Y microsphere therapy in liver presents a situation where beta transport is dominant and the tissue is relatively homogenous. We compare voxel-based absorbed doses from a 90Y kernel to Monte Carlo (MC) using quantitative 90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT as source distribution. Methods: Liver, normal liver, and tumors were delineated by an interventional radiologist using contrast-enhanced CT registered with 90Y SPECT/CT scans for 14 therapies. Right lung was segmented via region growing. The kernel was generated with 1.04 g/cc soft tissue for 4.8 mm voxel matching the SPECT. MC simulation materials included air, lung, soft tissue, and bone with varying densities. We report percent difference between kernel and MC (%Δ(K,MC)) for mean absorbed dose, D70, and V20Gy in total liver, normal liver, tumors, and right lung. We also report %Δ(K,MC) for heterogeneity metrics: coefficient of variation (COV) and D10/D90. The impact of spatial resolution (0, 10, 20 mm FWHM) and lung shunt fraction (LSF) (1,5,10,20%) on the accuracy of MC and kernel doses near the liver-lung interface was modeled in 1D. We report the distance from the interface where errors become <10% of unblurred MC as d10(side of interface, dose calculation, FWHM blurring, LSF). Results: The %Δ(K,MC) for mean, D70, andmore » V20Gy in tumor and liver was <7% while right lung differences varied from 60–90%. The %Δ(K,MC) for COV was <4.8% for tumor and liver and <54% for the right lung. The %Δ(K,MC) for D10/D90 was <5% for 22/23 tumors. d10(liver,MC,10,1–20) awere <9mm and d10(liver,MC,20,1–20) awere <15mm; both agreed within 3mm to the kernel. d10(lung,MC,10,20), d10(lung,MC,10,1), d10(lung,MC,20,20), and d10(lung,MC,20,1) awere 6, 25, 15, and 34mm, respectively. Kernel calculations on blurred distributions in lung had errors > 10%. Conclusions: Liver and tumor voxel doses with 90Y kernel and MC agree within 7%. Large differences exist between the two methods in right lung. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01CA138986. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.« less
Authors:
; ;  [1] ;  [2] ;  [3] ;  [4]
  1. The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, TX (United States)
  2. (United States)
  3. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)
  4. Christiana Care Hospital, Newark, DE (United States)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
22409625
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Medical Physics; Journal Volume: 41; Journal Issue: 6; Other Information: (c) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES; ABSORBED RADIATION DOSES; ACCURACY; BREMSSTRAHLUNG; CAT SCANNING; KERNELS; LIVER; LUNGS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEOPLASMS; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; THERAPY; YTTRIUM 90