skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Global warming implications of facade parameters: A life cycle assessment of residential buildings in Bahrain

Journal Article · · Environmental Impact Assessment Review
 [1];  [2]
  1. Global Engineering Bureau, P.O Box 33130, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain (Bahrain)
  2. School of Architecture, University of Liverpool (United Kingdom)

On a global scale, the Gulf Corporation Council Countries (GCCC), including Bahrain, are amongst the top countries in terms of carbon dioxide emissions per capita. Building authority in Bahrain has set a target of 40% reduction of electricity consumption and associated CO{sub 2} emissions to be achieved by using facade parameters. This work evaluates how the life cycle CO{sub 2} emissions of buildings are affected by facade parameters. The main focus is placed on direct and indirect CO{sub 2} emissions from three contributors, namely, chemical reactions during production processes (Pco{sub 2}), embodied energy (Eco{sub 2}) and operational energy (OPco{sub 2}). By means of the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, it has been possible to show that the greatest environmental impact occurs during the operational phase (80-90%). However, embodied CO{sub 2} emissions are an important factor that needs to be brought into the systems used for appraisal of projects, and hence into the design decisions made in developing projects. The assessment shows that masonry blocks are responsible for 70-90% of the total CO{sub 2} emissions of facade construction, mainly due to their physical characteristics. The highest Pco{sub 2} emissions factors are those of window elements, particularly aluminium frames. However, their contribution of CO{sub 2} emissions depends largely on the number and size of windows. Each square metre of glazing is able to increase the total CO{sub 2} emissions by almost 30% when compared with the same areas of opaque walls. The use of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) walls reduces the total life cycle CO{sub 2} emissions by almost 5.2% when compared with ordinary walls, while the use of thermal insulation with concrete wall reduces CO{sub 2} emissions by 1.2%. The outcome of this work offers to the building industry a reliable indicator of the environmental impact of residential facade parameters. - Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Life cycle carbon assessment of facade parameters. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Greatest environmental impact occurs during the operational phase. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Masonry blocks are responsible for 70-90% of the total CO2 emissions of facade construction. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Window contribution of CO2 emissions depends on the number and size of windows. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Without insulation, AAC walls offer more savings in CO2 emissions.

OSTI ID:
22131079
Journal Information:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 38; Other Information: Copyright (c) 2012 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0195-9255
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Methodology of CO{sub 2} emission evaluation in the life cycle of office building facades
Journal Article · Wed Feb 15 00:00:00 EST 2012 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · OSTI ID:22131079

Attributing land-use change carbon emissions to exported biomass
Journal Article · Thu Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2012 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · OSTI ID:22131079

A methodology to estimate greenhouse gases emissions in Life Cycle Inventories of wastewater treatment plants
Journal Article · Thu Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2012 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · OSTI ID:22131079