skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: HOW WELL CAN WE MEASURE THE INTRINSIC VELOCITY DISPERSION OF DISTANT DISK GALAXIES?

Journal Article · · Astrophysical Journal
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7]
  1. Max-Planck-Institut fuer extraterrestrische Physik, 85741 Garching (Germany)
  2. INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, 50125 Firenze (Italy)
  3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 (United States)
  4. Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 (United States)
  5. Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 (United States)
  6. Aerospace Research Laboratories, Northrop Grumman Aerospeace Systems, Redondo Beach, CA 90278 (United States)
  7. School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv (Israel)

The kinematics of distant galaxies from z = 0.1 to z > 2 play a key role in our understanding of galaxy evolution from early times to the present. One of the important parameters is the intrinsic, or local, velocity dispersion of a galaxy, which allows one to quantify the degree of non-circular motions such as pressure support. However, this is difficult to measure because the observed dispersion includes the effects of (often severe) beam smearing on the velocity gradient. Here we investigate four methods of measuring the dispersion that have been used in the literature, to assess their effectiveness at recovering the intrinsic dispersion. We discuss the biases inherent in each method, and apply them to model disk galaxies in order to determine which methods yield meaningful quantities and under what conditions. All the mean-weighted dispersion estimators are affected by (residual) beam smearing. In contrast, the dispersion recovered by fitting a spatially and spectrally convolved disk model to the data is unbiased by the beam smearing it is trying to compensate. Because of this, and because the bias it does exhibit depends only on the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), it can be considered reliable. However, at very low S/N, all methods should be used with caution.

OSTI ID:
21612717
Journal Information:
Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 741, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/69; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0004-637X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English