skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Controversy concerning the definition of quark and gluon angular momentum

Journal Article · · Physical Review. D, Particles Fields
 [1]
  1. Blackett laboratory, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ (United Kingdom)

A major controversy has arisen in QCD as to how to split the total angular momentum into separate quark and gluon contributions, and as to whether the gluon angular momentum can itself be split, in a gauge-invariant way, into a spin and orbital part. Several authors have proposed various answers to these questions and offered a variety of different expressions for the relevant operators. I argue that none of these is acceptable and suggest that the canonical expression for the momentum and angular momentum operators is the correct and physically meaningful one. It is then an inescapable fact that the gluon angular momentum operator cannot, in general, be split in a gauge-invariant way into a spin and orbital part. However, the projection of the gluon spin onto its direction of motion, i.e. its helicity is gauge invariant and is measured in deep inelastic scattering on nucleons. The Ji sum rule, relating the quark angular momentum to generalized parton distributions, though not based on the canonical operators, is shown to be correct, if interpreted with due care. I also draw attention to several interesting aspects of QED and QCD, which, to the best of my knowledge, are not commented upon in the standard textbooks on field theory.

OSTI ID:
21541661
Journal Information:
Physical Review. D, Particles Fields, Vol. 83, Issue 9; Other Information: DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.096012; (c) 2011 American Institute of Physics; ISSN 0556-2821
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English