skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Radiotherapy and Survival in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [1];  [3]; ;  [1];  [3]
  1. Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (United States)
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (United States)
  3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (United States)
  4. Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (United States)

Purpose: To investigate the association of overall and disease-specific survival with the five standard treatment modalities for prostate cancer (CaP): radical prostatectomy (RP), brachytherapy (BT), external beam radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and no treatment (NT) within 6 months after CaP diagnosis. Methods and Materials: The study population included 10,179 men aged 65 years and older with incident CaP diagnosed between 1999 and 2001. Using the linked Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System, Medicare, and death certificate files, overall and disease-specific survival through 2005 among the five clinically accepted therapies were analyzed. Results: Disease-specific survival rates were 92.3% and 23.9% for patients with localized vs. distant disease at 7 years, respectively. Controlling for age, race, comorbidities, stage, and Gleason score, results from the Cox multiple regression models indicated that the risk of CaP-specific death was significantly reduced in patients receiving RP or BT, compared with NT. For localized disease, compared with NT, in the monotherapy cohort, RP and BT were associated with reduced hazard ratios (HR) of 0.25 and 0.45 (95% confidence intervals 0.13-0.48 and 0.23-0.87, respectively), whereas in the combination therapy cohort, HR were 0.40 (0.17-0.94) and 0.46 (0.27-0.80), respectively. Conclusions: The present population-based study indicates that RP and BT are associated with improved survival outcomes. Further studies are warranted to improve clinical determinates in the selection of appropriate management of CaP and to improve predictive modeling for which patient subsets may benefit most from definitive therapy vs. conservative management and/or observation.

OSTI ID:
21172528
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 73, Issue 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.001; PII: S0360-3016(08)00547-6; Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Incidence of Second Malignancies in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Radical Prostatectomy
Journal Article · Sat Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2014 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21172528

Survival After Conservative Management Versus External Beam Radiation Therapy in Elderly Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
Journal Article · Thu Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2016 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21172528

Comparative Effectiveness of 5 Treatment Strategies for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly
Journal Article · Sat Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 2012 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21172528