skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Portal imaging practice patterns of children's oncology group institutions: Dosimetric assessment and recommendations for minimizing unnecessary exposure

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [4]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine and Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (United States)
  2. Department of Medical Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States)
  3. Department of Medical Physics and Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States)
  4. Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (United States)

Purpose: To determine and analyze the dosimetric consequences of current portal imaging practices for pediatric patients, and make specific recommendations for reducing exposure from portal imaging procedures. Methods and Materials: A survey was sent to approximately 250 Children's Oncology Group (COG) member institutions asking a series of questions about their portal imaging practices. Three case studies are presented with dosimetric analysis to illustrate the magnitude of unintended dose received by nontarget tissues using the most common techniques from the survey. Results: The vast majority of centers use double-exposure portal image techniques with a variety of open field margins. Only 17% of portal images were obtained during treatment, and for other imaging methods, few centers subtract monitor units from the treatment delivery. The number of monitor units used was nearly the same regardless of imager type, including electronic portal imaging devices. Eighty-six percent imaged all fields the first week and 17% imaged all fields every week. An additional 1,112 cm{sup 3} of nontarget tissue received 1 Gy in one of the example cases. Eight new recommendations are made, which will lower nontarget radiation doses with minimal impact on treatment verification accuracy. Conclusion: Based on the survey, changes can be made in portal imaging practices that will lower nontarget doses. It is anticipated that treatment verification accuracy will be minimally affected. Specific recommendations made to decrease the imaging dose and help lower the rate of radiation-induced secondary cancers in children are proposed for inclusion in future COG protocols using radiation therapy.

OSTI ID:
20944707
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 67, Issue 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.004; PII: S0360-3016(06)03245-7; Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Effect of Radiotherapy Techniques (IMRT vs. 3D-CRT) on Outcome in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma Enrolled in COG D9803-A Report From the Children's Oncology Group
Journal Article · Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20944707

MO-D-BRB-00: Pediatric Radiation Therapy Planning, Treatment, and Late Effects
Journal Article · Mon Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:20944707

MO-D-BRB-01: Pediatric Treatment Planning I: Overview of Planning Strategies and Challenges
Journal Article · Mon Jun 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Medical Physics · OSTI ID:20944707