skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Testing the lognormality of the galaxy and weak lensing convergence distributions from Dark Energy Survey maps

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [3];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [1];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [7];  [12];  [13] more »;  [1];  [14];  [15];  [16];  [5];  [17];  [18];  [15];  [19];  [9];  [19];  [20];  [21];  [9];  [5];  [22];  [21];  [14];  [16];  [9];  [23];  [8];  [9];  [24];  [9];  [25];  [10];  [26];  [9];  [27];  [28];  [29];  [30];  [21];  [30];  [8];  [9];  [31];  [7];  [32];  [21];  [8] « less
  1. Univ. College London, London (United Kingdom)
  2. Univ. College London, London (United Kingdom); Rhodes Univ., Grahamstown (South Africa)
  3. ETH Zurich, Zurich (Switzerland)
  4. Univ. of Portsmouth, Portsmouth (United Kingdom)
  5. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (ICE, IEEC/CSIC), Bellaterra (Barcelona) (Spain)
  6. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Merate (Italy)
  7. Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States)
  8. Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, La Serena (Chile)
  9. Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
  10. Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ (United States)
  11. Univ. College London, London (United Kingdom); Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, Paris (France)
  12. Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena, CA (United States)
  13. Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, Paris (France)
  14. Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA (United States); SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
  15. Lab. Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia - LIneA, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil); Observatorio Nacional, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil)
  16. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL (United States); National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Urbana, IL (United States)
  17. Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA (United States)
  18. Univ. of Portsmouth, Portsmouth (United Kingdom); Univ. of Southampton, Southampton (United Kingdom)
  19. Excellence Cluster Universe, Garching (Germany); Ludwig-Maximilians-Univ., Munich (Germany)
  20. Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (United States); California Inst. of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)
  21. Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
  22. Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, IL (United States)
  23. The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)
  24. Australian Astronomical Observatory, North Ryde, NSW (Australia)
  25. Lab. Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia - LIneA, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil); Univ. de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo (Brazil)
  26. Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats, Barcelona (Spain); The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Bellaterra (Barcelona) (Spain)
  27. California Inst. of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)
  28. Univ. of Sussex, Brighton (United Kingdom)
  29. SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States); Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, IL (United States)
  30. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas (CIEMAT), Madrid (Spain)
  31. Lab. Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia - LIneA, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil); Univ. Estadual Paulista, Sao Paulo (Brazil)
  32. National Center for Supercomputing Applications, Urbana, IL (United States)

It is well known that the probability distribution function (PDF) of galaxy density contrast is approximately lognormal; whether the PDF of mass fluctuations derived from weak lensing convergence (κWL) is lognormal is less well established. We derive PDFs of the galaxy and projected matter density distributions via the counts-in-cells (CiC) method. We use maps of galaxies and weak lensing convergence produced from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data over 139 deg2. We test whether the underlying density contrast is well described by a lognormal distribution for the galaxies, the convergence and their joint PDF. We confirm that the galaxy density contrast distribution is well modelled by a lognormal PDF convolved with Poisson noise at angular scales from 10 to 40 arcmin (corresponding to physical scales of 3–10 Mpc). We note that as κWL is a weighted sum of the mass fluctuations along the line of sight, its PDF is expected to be only approximately lognormal. We find that the κWL distribution is well modelled by a lognormal PDF convolved with Gaussian shape noise at scales between 10 and 20 arcmin, with a best-fitting χ2/dof of 1.11 compared to 1.84 for a Gaussian model, corresponding to p-values 0.35 and 0.07, respectively, at a scale of 10 arcmin. Above 20 arcmin a simple Gaussian model is sufficient. The joint PDF is also reasonably fitted by a bivariate lognormal. As a consistency check, we compare the variances derived from the lognormal modelling with those directly measured via CiC. Lastly, our methods are validated against maps from the MICE Grand Challenge N-body simulation.

Research Organization:
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Contributing Organization:
DES Collaboration
Grant/Contract Number:
291329; AC02-76SF00515; AC02-07CH11359; AC05-00OR22725; SC0011726
OSTI ID:
1352544
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1288751; OSTI ID: 1352813; OSTI ID: 1602513
Report Number(s):
FERMILAB-PUB-16-161-AE; arXiv:1605.02036; TRN: US1701683
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 466, Issue 2; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Royal Astronomical SocietyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 44 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (63)

Weak gravitational lensing journal January 2001
Skewness and kurtosis in large-scale cosmic fields journal September 1994
Properties of the cosmological density distribution function journal April 1995
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory journal September 2002
How Stochastic Is the Relative Bias between Galaxy Types? journal November 2000
Redshift distributions of galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification shear catalogue and implications for weak lensing journal August 2016
An algorithm to build mock galaxy catalogues using MICE simulations journal December 2014
On the Incompleteness of the Moment and Correlation Function Hierarchy as Probes of the Lognormal Field journal August 2011
Wide-Field Lensing Mass Maps from Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data journal July 2015
A lognormal model for the cosmological mass distribution journal January 1991
The MICE Grand Challenge lightcone simulation – II. Halo and galaxy catalogues journal August 2015
Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in the DES Science Verification data journal December 2015
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview journal March 2016
Testing a New Analytic Model for Gravitational Lensing Probabilities journal July 2006
CFHTLenS: the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey – imaging data and catalogue products journal June 2013
The dark Energy Camera journal October 2015
The MICE Grand Challenge light-cone simulation – III. Galaxy lensing mocks from all-sky lensing maps journal December 2014
The MICE grand challenge lightcone simulation – I. Dark matter clustering journal March 2015
The Galaxy correlation hierarchy in perturbation theory journal April 1984
Cosmological density fluctuations and large-scale structure From N-point correlation functions to the probability distribution journal February 1985
Redshift distortions of galaxy correlation functions journal April 1994
Lognormal X-Ray Flux Variations in an Extreme Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxy journal August 2004
N-point correlation functions in the CfA and SSRS redshift distribution of galaxies journal October 1992
Probing the statistics of primordial fluctuations and their evolution journal January 1993
HEALPix: A Framework for High‐Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere journal April 2005
Cosmic shear covariance: the log-normal approximation journal December 2011
Measuring the growth of matter fluctuations with third-order galaxy correlations journal December 2014
The Distribution of Extra-Galactic Nebulae journal January 1934
The DES Science Verification weak lensing shear catalogues journal May 2016
Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data journal August 2016
Weak lensing observables in the halo model journal September 2011
Mapping the dark matter with weak gravitational lensing journal February 1993
Probability Distribution Function of Cosmological Density Fluctuations from a Gaussian Initial Condition: Comparison of One‐Point and Two‐Point Lognormal Model Predictions with N ‐Body Simulations journal November 2001
Weighing the Giants – II. Improved calibration of photometry from stellar colours and accurate photometric redshifts journal February 2014
Non-Gaussian signatures from Gaussian initial fluctuations - Evolution of skewness and kurtosis from cosmological simulations in the highly nonlinear regime journal January 1993
Mapping and Simulating Systematics due to Spatially Varying Observing Conditions in des Science Verification data journal October 2016
Log-normal Distributions across the Sciences: Keys and Clues journal January 2001
Angular momentum of disc galaxies with a lognormal density distribution journal August 2015
Probing the Universe with Weak Lensing journal September 1999
The statistics of weak lensing at small angular scales: probability distribution function journal October 2000
Rejuvenating the Matter Power Spectrum: Restoring Information with a Logarithmic Density Mapping journal May 2009
Statistics of the Distribution of Galaxies journal February 1980
Principles of Physical Cosmology journal April 1994
A new method to measure galaxy bias by combining the density and weak lensing fields journal July 2016
The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data journal May 2016
Thermodynamics and galaxy clustering - Nonlinear theory of high order correlations journal January 1984
Re-Capturing Cosmic Information journal February 2011
An implementation of Bayesian lensing shear measurement journal July 2014
CFHTLenS: a Gaussian likelihood is a sufficient approximation for a cosmological analysis of third-order cosmic shear statistics journal March 2015
Exploring Nonlinear Gravitational Clustering Phenomena with Cosmological N-Body Simulations journal December 1993
A gravitational thermodynamic approach to probe the primordial spectrum of cosmological density fluctuations journal February 1990
Higher order statistics of the galaxy distribution using generating functions journal May 1993
Single Parameter Galaxy Classification: the Principal Curve Through the Multi-Dimensional Space of Galaxy Properties journal August 2012
Probability Distribution Functions of Cosmological Lensing: Convergence, Shear, and Magnification journal November 2011
Lognormal Property of Weak‐Lensing Fields journal June 2002
Counts-in-cells analysis of the statistical distribution in an N-body simulated universe journal June 1996
CFHTLenS: mapping the large-scale structure with gravitational lensing journal June 2013
Wide-field lensing mass maps from Dark Energy Survey science verification data: Methodology and detailed analysis journal July 2015
The hierarchy of correlation functions and its relation to other measures of galaxy clustering journal February 1979
The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: stochastic relative biasing between galaxy populations journal January 2005
Improving lognormal models for cosmological fields journal April 2016
Star formation from hierarchical cloud fragmentation: a statistical theory of the log-normal initial mass function journal September 1984
im3shape: a maximum likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic gravitational lensing journal July 2013

Cited By (13)

High-precision Monte Carlo modelling of galaxy distribution journal January 2020
A nulling strategy for modelling lensing convergence in cones with large deviation theory journal January 2020
Improving weak lensing mass map reconstructions using Gaussian and sparsity priors: application to DES SV journal May 2018
Testing (modified) gravity with 3D and tomographic cosmic shear journal August 2018
Measuring linear and non-linear galaxy bias using counts-in-cells in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data journal October 2018
Cylinders out of a top hat: counts-in-cells for projected densities journal March 2018
Improving weak lensing mass map reconstructions using Gaussian and sparsity priors: Application to DES SV text January 2018
Cylinders out of a top hat: Counts-in-cells for projected densities text January 2018
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing text January 2017
Density split statistics: Cosmological constraints from counts and lensing in cells in DES Y1 and SDSS data text January 2017
Cylinders out of a top hat: counts-in-cells for projected densities text January 2017
Measuring Linear and Non-linear Galaxy Bias Using Counts-in-Cells in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data text January 2018
High-precision Monte-Carlo modelling of galaxy distribution text January 2019