Information or resolution: Which is required from an SEM to study bulk inorganic materials?: Evaluate SEMs’ practical performance
Abstract
Significant technological advances in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) have been achieved over the past years. Different SEMs can have significant differences in functionality and performance. Here, this work presents the perspectives on selecting an SEM for research on bulk inorganic materials. Understanding materials demands quantitative composition and orientation information, and informative and interpretable images that reveal subtle differences in chemistry, orientation/structure, topography, and electronic structure. The capability to yield informative and interpretable images with high signal-to-noise ratios and spatial resolutions is an overall result of the SEM system as a whole, from the electron optical column to the detection system. The electron optical column determines probe performance. The roles of the detection system are to capture, filter or discriminate, and convert signal electrons to imaging information. The capability to control practical operating parameters including electron probe size and current, acceleration voltage or landing voltage, working distance, detector selection, and signal filtration is inherently determined by the SEM itself. As a platform for various accessories, e.g. an energy-dispersive spectrometer and an electron backscatter diffraction detector, the properties of the electron optical column, specimen chamber, and stage greatly affect the performance of accessories. Ease-of-use and ease-of-maintenance are of practical importance. It ismore »
- Authors:
-
- Ames Lab., Ames, IA (United States). Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Ames Laboratory (AMES), Ames, IA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1342927
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1347894
- Report Number(s):
- IS-J-9020; IS-J-9198
Journal ID: ISSN 0161-0457
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC02-07CH11358
- Resource Type:
- Journal Article: Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Scanning
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 38; Journal Issue: 6; Journal ID: ISSN 0161-0457
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 36 MATERIALS SCIENCE; scanning electron microscopy (SEM); probe performance; detection performance
Citation Formats
Xing, Q. Information or resolution: Which is required from an SEM to study bulk inorganic materials?: Evaluate SEMs’ practical performance. United States: N. p., 2016.
Web. doi:10.1002/sca.21336.
Xing, Q. Information or resolution: Which is required from an SEM to study bulk inorganic materials?: Evaluate SEMs’ practical performance. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21336
Xing, Q. 2016.
"Information or resolution: Which is required from an SEM to study bulk inorganic materials?: Evaluate SEMs’ practical performance". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21336. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1342927.
@article{osti_1342927,
title = {Information or resolution: Which is required from an SEM to study bulk inorganic materials?: Evaluate SEMs’ practical performance},
author = {Xing, Q.},
abstractNote = {Significant technological advances in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) have been achieved over the past years. Different SEMs can have significant differences in functionality and performance. Here, this work presents the perspectives on selecting an SEM for research on bulk inorganic materials. Understanding materials demands quantitative composition and orientation information, and informative and interpretable images that reveal subtle differences in chemistry, orientation/structure, topography, and electronic structure. The capability to yield informative and interpretable images with high signal-to-noise ratios and spatial resolutions is an overall result of the SEM system as a whole, from the electron optical column to the detection system. The electron optical column determines probe performance. The roles of the detection system are to capture, filter or discriminate, and convert signal electrons to imaging information. The capability to control practical operating parameters including electron probe size and current, acceleration voltage or landing voltage, working distance, detector selection, and signal filtration is inherently determined by the SEM itself. As a platform for various accessories, e.g. an energy-dispersive spectrometer and an electron backscatter diffraction detector, the properties of the electron optical column, specimen chamber, and stage greatly affect the performance of accessories. Ease-of-use and ease-of-maintenance are of practical importance. It is practically important to select appropriate test specimens, design suitable imaging conditions, and analyze the specimen chamber geometry and dimensions to assess the overall functionality and performance of an SEM. Lastly, for an SEM that is controlled/operated with a computer, the stable software and user-friendly interface significantly affect the usability of the SEM.},
doi = {10.1002/sca.21336},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1342927},
journal = {Scanning},
issn = {0161-0457},
number = 6,
volume = 38,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Jul 11 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Mon Jul 11 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Electron Backscatter Diffraction in Materials Science
book, January 2009
- Schwartz, Adam J.; Kumar, Mukul; Adams, Brent L.
Elemental mapping of microstructures by scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS): extraordinary advances with the silicon drift detector (SDD)
journal, January 2013
- Newbury, Dale E.; Ritchie, Nicholas W. M.
- Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 28, Issue 7
A comparison of conventional Everhart-Thornley style and in-lens secondary electron detectors-a further variable in scanning electron microscopy
journal, May 2011
- Griffin, Brendan J.
- Scanning, Vol. 33, Issue 3
Image distortions in SEM and their influences on EBSD measurements
journal, February 2007
- Nolze, Gert
- Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 107, Issue 2-3
Recent advances in electron imaging, image interpretation and applications: environmental scanning electron microscopy
journal, November 2003
- Stokes, Debbie J.
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 361, Issue 1813
Application of EBSD to the analysis of interface planes: evolution over the last two decades
journal, June 2008
- Randle, V.
- Journal of Microscopy, Vol. 230, Issue 3
Does your SEM Really tell the truth?-how would you know? Part 1
journal, February 2013
- Postek, Michael T.; Vladár, András E.
- Scanning, Vol. 35, Issue 6
Electron imaging with an EBSD detector
journal, January 2015
- Wright, Stuart I.; Nowell, Matthew M.; de Kloe, René
- Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 148
Secondary electron emission in the scanning electron microscope
journal, November 1983
- Seiler, H.
- Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 54, Issue 11
Low voltage scanning electron microscopy
journal, June 1996
- Joy, David C.; Joy, Carolyn S.
- Micron, Vol. 27, Issue 3-4
Field-emission SEM imaging of compositional and doping layer semiconductor superlattices
journal, April 1995
- Perovic, D. D.; Castell, M. R.; Howie, A.
- Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 58, Issue 1
Does your SEM really tell the truth? How would you know? Part 2
journal, October 2013
- Postek, Michael T.; Vladár, András E.; Purushotham, Kavuri P.
- Scanning, Vol. 36, Issue 3
A new examination of secondary electron yield data
journal, January 2005
- Lin, Yinghong; Joy, David C.
- Surface and Interface Analysis, Vol. 37, Issue 11
Quantitative secondary electron energy filtering in a scanning electron microscope and its applications
journal, February 2007
- Kazemian, P.; Mentink, S. A. M.; Rodenburg, C.
- Ultramicroscopy, Vol. 107, Issue 2-3
CASINO V2.42—A Fast and Easy-to-use Modeling Tool for Scanning Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis Users
journal, January 2007
- Drouin, Dominique; Couture, Alexandre Réal; Joly, Dany
- Scanning, Vol. 29, Issue 3
Probe current, probe size, and the practical brightness for probe forming systems
journal, January 2008
- Bronsgeest, M. S.; Barth, J. E.; Swanson, L. W.
- Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, Vol. 26, Issue 3
Simulated SEM images for resolution measurement
journal, September 2008
- Cizmar, P.; Vladár, A. E.; Ming, B.
- Scanning, Vol. 30, Issue 5
Towards ultrahigh resolution EBSD by low accelerating voltage
journal, June 2010
- Steinmetz, D. R.; Zaefferer, S.
- Materials Science and Technology, Vol. 26, Issue 6
Performing elemental microanalysis with high accuracy and high precision by scanning electron microscopy/silicon drift detector energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/SDD-EDS)
journal, November 2014
- Newbury, Dale E.; Ritchie, Nicholas W. M.
- Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 50, Issue 2