skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Runaway electrons and magnetic island confinement

Abstract

The breakup of magnetic surfaces is a central feature of ITER planning for the avoidance of damage due to runaway electrons. Rapid thermal quenches, which lead to large accelerating voltages, are thought to be due to magnetic surface breakup. Impurity injection to avoid and to mitigate both halo and runaway electron currents utilizes massive gas injection or shattered pellets. The actual deposition is away from the plasma center, and the breakup of magnetic surfaces is thought to spread the effects of the impurities across the plasma cross section. The breakup of magnetic surfaces would prevent runaway electrons from reaching relativistic energies were it not for the persistence of non-intercepting flux tubes. These are tubes of magnetic field lines that do not intercept the walls. In simulations and in magnetic field models, non-intercepting flux tubes are found to persist near the magnetic axis and in the cores of magnetic islands even when a large scale magnetic surface breakup occurs. As long as a few magnetic surfaces reform before all of the non-intercepting flux tubes dissipate, energetic electrons confined and accelerated in these flux tubes can serve as the seed electrons for a transfer of the overall plasma current from thermal tomore » relativistic carriers. The acceleration of electrons is particularly strong because of the sudden changes in the poloidal flux that naturally occur in a rapid magnetic relaxation. Furthermore, the physics of magnetic islands as non-intercepting flux tubes is studied. Expressions are derived for (1) the size of islands required to confine energetic runaway electrons, (2) the accelerating electric field in an island, (3) the increase or reduction in the size of an island by the runaway electron current, (4) the approximate magnitude of the runaway current in an island, and (5) the time scale for the evolution of an island.« less

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Fusion Energy Sciences (FES)
OSTI Identifier:
1328739
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1302505
Grant/Contract Number:  
FG02-03ER54696; De-FG02-03ER54696
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physics of Plasmas
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 23; Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 1070-664X
Publisher:
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; runaway electrons; magnetic islands; turnstiles

Citation Formats

Boozer, Allen H. Runaway electrons and magnetic island confinement. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1063/1.4960969.
Boozer, Allen H. Runaway electrons and magnetic island confinement. United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960969
Boozer, Allen H. 2016. "Runaway electrons and magnetic island confinement". United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960969. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1328739.
@article{osti_1328739,
title = {Runaway electrons and magnetic island confinement},
author = {Boozer, Allen H.},
abstractNote = {The breakup of magnetic surfaces is a central feature of ITER planning for the avoidance of damage due to runaway electrons. Rapid thermal quenches, which lead to large accelerating voltages, are thought to be due to magnetic surface breakup. Impurity injection to avoid and to mitigate both halo and runaway electron currents utilizes massive gas injection or shattered pellets. The actual deposition is away from the plasma center, and the breakup of magnetic surfaces is thought to spread the effects of the impurities across the plasma cross section. The breakup of magnetic surfaces would prevent runaway electrons from reaching relativistic energies were it not for the persistence of non-intercepting flux tubes. These are tubes of magnetic field lines that do not intercept the walls. In simulations and in magnetic field models, non-intercepting flux tubes are found to persist near the magnetic axis and in the cores of magnetic islands even when a large scale magnetic surface breakup occurs. As long as a few magnetic surfaces reform before all of the non-intercepting flux tubes dissipate, energetic electrons confined and accelerated in these flux tubes can serve as the seed electrons for a transfer of the overall plasma current from thermal to relativistic carriers. The acceleration of electrons is particularly strong because of the sudden changes in the poloidal flux that naturally occur in a rapid magnetic relaxation. Furthermore, the physics of magnetic islands as non-intercepting flux tubes is studied. Expressions are derived for (1) the size of islands required to confine energetic runaway electrons, (2) the accelerating electric field in an island, (3) the increase or reduction in the size of an island by the runaway electron current, (4) the approximate magnitude of the runaway current in an island, and (5) the time scale for the evolution of an island.},
doi = {10.1063/1.4960969},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1328739}, journal = {Physics of Plasmas},
issn = {1070-664X},
number = 8,
volume = 23,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Aug 19 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Fri Aug 19 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 17 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Evaluation of the structure of ergodic fields
journal, January 1983


Energetic electron transport in the presence of magnetic perturbations in magnetically confined plasmas
journal, July 2015


The relativistic drift Hamiltonian
journal, September 1996


Magnetic reconnection: from the Sweet–Parker model to stochastic plasmoid chains
journal, November 2015


Nonlinear growth of the tearing mode
journal, January 1973


Non-axisymmetric magnetic fields and toroidal plasma confinement
journal, January 2015


Runaway electron beam generation and mitigation during disruptions at JET-ILW
journal, August 2015


Plasma equilibrium with rational magnetic surfaces
journal, January 1981


Collisional avalanche exponentiation of runaway electrons in electrified plasmas
journal, January 1993


Analysis of shot-to-shot variability in post-disruption runaway electron currents for diverted DIII-D discharges
journal, July 2012


Passive runaway electron suppression in tokamak disruptions
journal, July 2013


Runaway electron confinement modelling for rapid shutdown scenarios in DIII-D, Alcator C-Mod and ITER
journal, May 2011


Resistive stability of a plasma with runaway electrons
journal, December 2007


Theory for avalanche of runaway electrons in tokamaks
journal, October 1997


Disruptions in ITER and strategies for their control and mitigation
journal, August 2015


Rigorous new limits on magnetic helicity dissipation in the solar corona
journal, September 1984


Tokamak-like confinement at a high beta and low toroidal field in the MST reversed field pinch
journal, December 2003


A Theorem on Force-Free Magnetic Fields
journal, June 1958


Two beneficial non-axisymmetric perturbations to tokamaks
journal, May 2011


Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions
journal, June 2007


Relaxation of Toroidal Plasma and Generation of Reverse Magnetic Fields
journal, November 1974


Loss of relativistic electrons when magnetic surfaces are broken
journal, October 2016


Works referencing / citing this record:

Kink instabilities of the post-disruption runaway electron beam at low safety factor
journal, March 2019


Electron acceleration in a JET disruption simulation
journal, August 2018


Electron acceleration in a JET disruption simulation
text, January 2018