skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Single-probe measurements from DR12 galaxy clustering – towards an accurate model

Abstract

With the largest spectroscopic galaxy survey volume drawn from the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), we can extract cosmological constraints from the measurements of redshift and geometric distortions at quasi-linear scales (e.g. above 50 h -1 Mpc). We analyse the broad-range shape of the monopole and quadrupole correlation functions of the BOSS Data Release 12 (DR12) CMASS galaxy sample, at the effective redshift z = 0.59, to obtain constraints on the Hubble expansion rate H(z), the angular- diameter distance D A (z), the normalized growth rate f(z)σ 8 (z), and the physical matter density Ω m h 2 .We obtain robust measurements by including a polynomial as the model for the systematic errors, and find it works very well against the systematic effects, e.g. ones induced by stars and seeing. We provide accurate measurements (D A (0.59)r s,fid /r s , H(0.59)r s /r s,fid , f(0.59)σ 8 (0.59), Ω m h 2 ) = (1427 ± 26 Mpc, 97.3 ± 3.3 kms -1 Mpc -1 , 0.488 ± 0.060, 0.135 ± 0.016), where r s is the comoving sound horizon at the drag epoch and r s,fid = 147.66 Mpc is the sound scale of the fiducial cosmologymore » used in this study. The parameters which are not well constrained by our galaxy clustering analysis are marginalized over with wide flat priors. Since no priors from other data sets, e.g. cosmic microwave background (CMB), are adopted and no dark energy models are assumed, our results from BOSS CMASS galaxy clustering alone may be combined with other data sets, i.e. CMB, SNe, lensing or other galaxy clustering data to constrain the parameters of a given cosmological model. The uncertainty on the dark energy equation of state parameter, w, from CMB+CMASS is about 8 per cent. The uncertainty on the curvature fraction, Ω k , is 0.3 per cent. We do not find deviation from flat ΛCDM.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [7];  [10];  [11];  [12];  [13];  [14];  [10];  [15];  [16];  [17] more »;  [18];  [19];  [20];  [21];  [18];  [22];  [13];  [23] « less
  1. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias (IAC), Tenerife (Spain); Univ. de La Laguna (ULL), Tenerife (Spain); Univ. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid (Spain); Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), Potsdam (Germany)
  2. Univ. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid (Spain); Campus of International Excellence UAM+CSIC, Madrid (Spain); Univ. de Madrid (UAM), Madrid (Spain)
  3. The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States); Univ. of Portsmouth, Portsmouth (United Kingdom)
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing (China); Univ. of Portsmouth, Portsmouth (United Kingdom)
  5. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias (IAC), Tenerife (Spain); Univ. de La Laguna (ULL), Tenerife (Spain)
  6. Univ. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid (Spain); Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucia (CSIC), Granada (Spain)
  7. Sorbonne Univ., Paris (France); Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris (France)
  8. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Univ. of Portsmouth, Portsmouth (United Kingdom)
  9. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA (United States)
  10. Univ.-Sternwarte Munchen, Munich (Germany); Max-Planck-Institut fur extraterrestrische Physik, Garching (Germany)
  11. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)
  12. Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), Potsdam (Germany); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)
  13. Univ. of Portsmouth, Portsmouth (United Kingdom)
  14. Sejong Univ., Seoul (Korea)
  15. Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS (United States); Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); Univ. of Portsmouth, Portsmouth (United Kingdom)
  16. Max-Planck-Institut fur extraterrestrische Physik, Garching (Germany)
  17. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA (United States)
  18. Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
  19. New York Univ. (NYU), NY (United States)
  20. Univ. of St. Andrews, St. Andrews (United Kingdom)
  21. Univ. Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (Mexico)
  22. Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (United States)
  23. King's College, Wilkes Barre, PA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
OSTI Identifier:
1324269
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1377516
Report Number(s):
BNL-112529-2016-JA
Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711; KA2301020
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC00112704; AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 461; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Royal Astronomical Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; cosmology: observations; distance scale; large-scale structure of Universe; cosmological parameters

Citation Formats

Chia -Hsun Chuang, Pellejero-Ibanez, Marco, Rodriguez-Torres, Sergio, Ross, Ashley J., Zhao, Gong Bo, Wang, Yuting, Antonio J. Cuesta, Rubino-Martin, J. A., Prada, Francisco, Alam, Shadab, Beutler, Florian, Eisenstein, Daniel J., Gil-Martin, Hector, Grieb, Jan Kiklas, Ho, Shirley, Kitaura, Francisco -Shu, Percival, Will J., Rossi, Graziano, Salazar-Albornoz, Salvador, Samushia, Lado, Sanchez, Ariel G., Satpathy, Siddharth, Slosar, Anze, Tinker, Jeremy L., Tojeiro, Rita, Vargas-Magana, Mariana, Vazquez, Jose A., Brownstein, Joel R., Nichol, Robert C., and Olmstead, Matthew D. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Single-probe measurements from DR12 galaxy clustering – towards an accurate model. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1535.
Chia -Hsun Chuang, Pellejero-Ibanez, Marco, Rodriguez-Torres, Sergio, Ross, Ashley J., Zhao, Gong Bo, Wang, Yuting, Antonio J. Cuesta, Rubino-Martin, J. A., Prada, Francisco, Alam, Shadab, Beutler, Florian, Eisenstein, Daniel J., Gil-Martin, Hector, Grieb, Jan Kiklas, Ho, Shirley, Kitaura, Francisco -Shu, Percival, Will J., Rossi, Graziano, Salazar-Albornoz, Salvador, Samushia, Lado, Sanchez, Ariel G., Satpathy, Siddharth, Slosar, Anze, Tinker, Jeremy L., Tojeiro, Rita, Vargas-Magana, Mariana, Vazquez, Jose A., Brownstein, Joel R., Nichol, Robert C., & Olmstead, Matthew D. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Single-probe measurements from DR12 galaxy clustering – towards an accurate model. United States. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1535
Chia -Hsun Chuang, Pellejero-Ibanez, Marco, Rodriguez-Torres, Sergio, Ross, Ashley J., Zhao, Gong Bo, Wang, Yuting, Antonio J. Cuesta, Rubino-Martin, J. A., Prada, Francisco, Alam, Shadab, Beutler, Florian, Eisenstein, Daniel J., Gil-Martin, Hector, Grieb, Jan Kiklas, Ho, Shirley, Kitaura, Francisco -Shu, Percival, Will J., Rossi, Graziano, Salazar-Albornoz, Salvador, Samushia, Lado, Sanchez, Ariel G., Satpathy, Siddharth, Slosar, Anze, Tinker, Jeremy L., Tojeiro, Rita, Vargas-Magana, Mariana, Vazquez, Jose A., Brownstein, Joel R., Nichol, Robert C., and Olmstead, Matthew D. 2016. "The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Single-probe measurements from DR12 galaxy clustering – towards an accurate model". United States. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1535. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1324269.
@article{osti_1324269,
title = {The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Single-probe measurements from DR12 galaxy clustering – towards an accurate model},
author = {Chia -Hsun Chuang and Pellejero-Ibanez, Marco and Rodriguez-Torres, Sergio and Ross, Ashley J. and Zhao, Gong Bo and Wang, Yuting and Antonio J. Cuesta and Rubino-Martin, J. A. and Prada, Francisco and Alam, Shadab and Beutler, Florian and Eisenstein, Daniel J. and Gil-Martin, Hector and Grieb, Jan Kiklas and Ho, Shirley and Kitaura, Francisco -Shu and Percival, Will J. and Rossi, Graziano and Salazar-Albornoz, Salvador and Samushia, Lado and Sanchez, Ariel G. and Satpathy, Siddharth and Slosar, Anze and Tinker, Jeremy L. and Tojeiro, Rita and Vargas-Magana, Mariana and Vazquez, Jose A. and Brownstein, Joel R. and Nichol, Robert C. and Olmstead, Matthew D.},
abstractNote = {With the largest spectroscopic galaxy survey volume drawn from the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), we can extract cosmological constraints from the measurements of redshift and geometric distortions at quasi-linear scales (e.g. above 50 h -1 Mpc). We analyse the broad-range shape of the monopole and quadrupole correlation functions of the BOSS Data Release 12 (DR12) CMASS galaxy sample, at the effective redshift z = 0.59, to obtain constraints on the Hubble expansion rate H(z), the angular- diameter distance D A (z), the normalized growth rate f(z)σ 8 (z), and the physical matter density Ω m h 2 .We obtain robust measurements by including a polynomial as the model for the systematic errors, and find it works very well against the systematic effects, e.g. ones induced by stars and seeing. We provide accurate measurements (D A (0.59)r s,fid /r s , H(0.59)r s /r s,fid , f(0.59)σ 8 (0.59), Ω m h 2 ) = (1427 ± 26 Mpc, 97.3 ± 3.3 kms -1 Mpc -1 , 0.488 ± 0.060, 0.135 ± 0.016), where r s is the comoving sound horizon at the drag epoch and r s,fid = 147.66 Mpc is the sound scale of the fiducial cosmology used in this study. The parameters which are not well constrained by our galaxy clustering analysis are marginalized over with wide flat priors. Since no priors from other data sets, e.g. cosmic microwave background (CMB), are adopted and no dark energy models are assumed, our results from BOSS CMASS galaxy clustering alone may be combined with other data sets, i.e. CMB, SNe, lensing or other galaxy clustering data to constrain the parameters of a given cosmological model. The uncertainty on the dark energy equation of state parameter, w, from CMB+CMASS is about 8 per cent. The uncertainty on the curvature fraction, Ω k , is 0.3 per cent. We do not find deviation from flat ΛCDM.},
doi = {10.1093/mnras/stw1535},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1324269}, journal = {Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society},
issn = {0035-8711},
number = 4,
volume = 461,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Jun 26 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Sun Jun 26 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 76 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera
journal, December 1998


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the correlation function of LOWZ and CMASS galaxies in Data Release 12
journal, February 2016


Using multipoles of the correlation function to measure H(z), DA(z) and  (z) from Sloan Digital Sky Survey luminous red galaxies
journal, March 2013


The clustering of galaxies at z ≈ 0.5 in the SDSS-III Data Release 9 BOSS-CMASS sample: a test for the ΛCDM cosmology
journal, April 2013


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measuring H(z) and DA(z) at z = 0.57 with clustering wedges
journal, August 2013


Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann‐Robertson‐Walker Models
journal, August 2000


Large‐Scale Anisotropic Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies
journal, April 2008


The Multi-Object, Fiber-Fed Spectrographs for the Sloan Digital sky Survey and the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
journal, July 2013


Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
journal, October 2014


The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
journal, April 1996


Spectral Classification and Redshift Measurement for the Sdss-Iii Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey
journal, October 2012


Interpreting large-scale redshift-space distortion measurements: Large-scale redshift-space distortions
journal, January 2012


Robust constraints on dark energy and gravity from galaxy clustering data: Galaxy clustering
journal, June 2012


On the Robustness of the Acoustic Scale in the Low‐Redshift Clustering of Matter
journal, August 2007


The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
text, January 2009


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering
journal, June 2012


The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spherical harmonics analysis of fluctuations in the final catalogue
journal, October 2004


Power-spectrum analysis of three-dimensional redshift surveys
journal, May 1994


Cosmological constraints from the clustering of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 luminous red galaxies
journal, March 2010


Baryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function
journal, April 1998


The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts
journal, December 2001


Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
journal, October 2014


Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
journal, September 1998


Cosmological parameter constraints from SDSS luminous red galaxies: a new treatment of large-scale clustering
journal, December 2009


Measurement of H(z) and DA(z) from the two-dimensional power spectrum of Sloan Digital Sky Survey luminous red galaxies
journal, October 2014


The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
journal, September 2000


The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15
journal, March 2015


MultiDark simulations: the story of dark matter halo concentrations and density profiles
journal, February 2016


The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: survey design and first data release
journal, January 2010


Cosmological baryonic and matter densities from 600 000 SDSS luminous red galaxies with photometric redshifts
journal, February 2007


Measuring DA and H at z=0.35 from the SDSS DR7 LRGs using baryon acoustic oscillations
journal, March 2013


Acoustic Scale from the Angular Power Spectra of Sdss-Iii dr8 Photometric Luminous Galaxies
journal, November 2012


Cosmological structure formation with augmented Lagrangian perturbation theory
journal, August 2013


The 6dF Galaxy Survey: z≈ 0 measurements of the growth rate and σ8: 6dFGS: z≈ 0 measurements of fσ8 and σ8
journal, June 2012


The Three‐Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
journal, May 2004


A 2 per cent distance to z = 0.35 by reconstructing baryon acoustic oscillations – I. Methods and application to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey : A 2 per cent distance to z = 0.35
journal, November 2012


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: testing gravity with redshift space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles
journal, July 2014


Simultaneous constraints on the growth of structure and cosmic expansion from the multipole power spectra of the SDSS DR7 LRG sample
journal, February 2014


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measuring growth rate and geometry with anisotropic clustering
journal, February 2014


The Seventh data Release of the Sloan Digital sky Survey
journal, May 2009


Testing cosmological structure formation using redshift-space distortions
journal, February 2009


NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS
journal, September 2013


Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix
journal, December 2006


Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
journal, June 1999


The 2.5 m Telescope of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
journal, April 2006


Modelling baryon acoustic oscillations with perturbation theory and stochastic halo biasing
journal, December 2013


The Third Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
journal, March 2005


The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of Sdss-Iii
journal, December 2012


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological constraints from the full shape of the clustering wedges
journal, June 2013


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Releases 10 and 11 Galaxy samples
journal, April 2014


The clustering of luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey imaging data
journal, June 2007


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: galaxy clustering measurements in the low-redshift sample of Data Release 11
journal, April 2014


The Eleventh and Twelfth data Releases of the Sloan Digital sky Survey: Final data from Sdss-Iii
journal, July 2015


A 2.5 per cent measurement of the growth rate from small-scale redshift space clustering of SDSS-III CMASS galaxies
journal, August 2014


Measuring the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation scale using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Measuring the BAO scale
journal, September 2007


Spectroscopic Target Selection for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Luminous Red Galaxy Sample
journal, November 2001


Cosmological implications from the full shape of the large-scale power spectrum of the SDSS DR7 luminous red galaxies: Cosmological parameters from the DR7 LRG P(k)
journal, March 2012


The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z < 1 : WiggleZ Survey: expansion history
journal, July 2012


Reconstructing the history of structure formation using redshift distortions
journal, October 2009


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: a large sample of mock galaxy catalogues
journal, October 2012


nIFTy cosmology: Galaxy/halo mock catalogue comparison project on clustering statistics
journal, July 2015


Sdss-Iii: Massive Spectroscopic Surveys of the Distant Universe, the Milky way, and Extra-Solar Planetary Systems
journal, August 2011


An evolution free test for non-zero cosmological constant
journal, October 1979


Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 galaxy sample
journal, February 2010


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: modelling the clustering and halo occupation distribution of BOSS CMASS galaxies in the Final Data Release
journal, April 2016


Testing general relativity with growth rate measurement from Sloan Digital Sky Survey – III. Baryon Oscillations Spectroscopic Survey galaxies
journal, August 2015


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: mock galaxy catalogues for the BOSS Final Data Release
journal, January 2016


Constraining the halo bispectrum in real and redshift space from perturbation theory and non-linear stochastic bias
journal, April 2015


Clustering of luminous red galaxies - I. Large-scale redshift-space distortions
journal, March 2009


SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12: galaxy target selection and large-scale structure catalogues
journal, November 2015


Differentiating dark energy and modified gravity with galaxy redshift surveys
journal, May 2008


Bias and variance of angular correlation functions
journal, July 1993


Clustering in real space and in redshift space
journal, July 1987


The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: mock galaxy catalogues for the low-redshift sample
journal, December 2014


Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large‐Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies
journal, November 2005


A test of the nature of cosmic acceleration using galaxy redshift distortions
journal, January 2008


The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: mapping the distance-redshift relation with baryon acoustic oscillations: WiggleZ Survey: BAOs in redshift slices
journal, October 2011


Memory of initial conditions in gravitational clustering
journal, March 2006


The Baryonic Acoustic Feature and Large-Scale Clustering in the Sloan Digital sky Survey Luminous red Galaxy Sample
journal, February 2010


Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
journal, November 2002


Reliability of the Detection of the Baryon Acoustic peak
journal, April 2009


The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Final data release and cosmological results
journal, November 2012


The seventh data release of the sloan digital sky survey
text, January 2009


Large-Scale Anisotropic Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies
text, January 2007


Reliability of the detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak
text, January 2008


The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Survey Design and First Data Release
text, January 2009


The Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey of SDSS-III
text, January 2012


Planck 2013 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results
text, January 2013


Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters
text, January 2013


The 2.5 m Telescope of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
text, January 2006


Works referencing / citing this record:

Testing gravity on large scales by combining weak lensing with galaxy clustering using CFHTLenS and BOSS CMASS
journal, November 2016


The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: towards a computationally efficient analysis without informative priors
journal, March 2017


Perturbation level interacting dark energy model and its consequence on late-time cosmological parameters
journal, February 2020


Conjoined constraints on modified gravity from the expansion history and cosmic growth
journal, September 2017


Unraveling the effective fluid approach for f ( R ) models in the subhorizon approximation
journal, February 2019


Dipolar modulation in the size of galaxies: the effect of Doppler magnification
journal, August 2017


Internal robustness of growth rate data
journal, October 2018


A semi-analytical perspective on massive galaxies at z ∼ 0.55
journal, March 2019


Planck 2015 results : XXIII. The thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect-cosmic infrared background correlation
journal, September 2016


Observational constraints on the oscillating dark energy cosmologies
journal, February 2019


Cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic growth and expansion
journal, July 2017


Constraining power of cosmological observables: Blind redshift spots and optimal ranges
journal, March 2019


Cosmological signatures of dark sector physics: the evolution of haloes and spin alignment
journal, January 2020


Growth of matter perturbations in the bi-Galileons field model
journal, December 2019


Effective gravitational coupling in modified teleparallel theories
journal, April 2018


Planck 2015 results : XIII. Cosmological parameters
journal, September 2016


Model-independent reconstruction of the linear anisotropic stress η
journal, November 2018


Coupled quintessence with a ΛCDM background: removing the σ 8 tension
journal, January 2019


Planck 2015 results : X. Diffuse component separation: Foreground maps
journal, September 2016


Planck 2015 results : XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
journal, September 2016


Planck 2015 results : XXVI. The Second
journal, September 2016


Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
text, January 2015


Validating estimates of the growth rate of structure with modified gravity simulations
text, January 2016


Dipolar modulation in the size of galaxies: The effect of Doppler magnification
text, January 2016


Effective gravitational coupling in modified teleparallel theories
text, January 2018


Designing Horndeski and the effective fluid approach
text, January 2019