skip to main content

SciTech ConnectSciTech Connect

Title: Analytical Performance Characteristics of the Cepheid GeneXpert Ebola Assay for the Detection of Ebola Virus

The recently developed Xpert® Ebola Assay is a novel nucleic acid amplification test for simplified detection of Ebola virus (EBOV) in whole blood and buccal swab samples. The assay targets sequences in two EBOV genes, lowering the risk for new variants to escape detection in the test. The objective of this report is to present analytical characteristics of the Xpert® Ebola Assay on whole blood samples. Our study evaluated the assay’s analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity, inclusivity and exclusivity performance in whole blood specimens. EBOV RNA, inactivated EBOV, and infectious EBOV were used as targets. The dynamic range of the assay, the inactivation of virus, and specimen stability were also evaluated. The lower limit of detection (LoD) for the assay using inactivated virus was estimated to be 73 copies/mL (95% CI: 51–97 copies/mL). The LoD for infectious virus was estimated to be 1 plaque-forming unit/mL, and for RNA to be 232 copies/mL (95% CI 163–302 copies/mL). The assay correctly identified five different Ebola viruses, Yambuku-Mayinga, Makona-C07, Yambuku-Ecran, Gabon-Ilembe, and Kikwit-956210, and correctly excluded all non-EBOV isolates tested. The conditions used by Xpert® Ebola for inactivation of infectious virus reduced EBOV titer by ≥6 logs. In conclusion, we found the Xpert® Ebolamore » Assay to have high analytical sensitivity and specificity for the detection of EBOV in whole blood. It offers ease of use, fast turnaround time, and remote monitoring. The test has an efficient viral inactivation protocol, fulfills inclusivity and exclusivity criteria, and has specimen stability characteristics consistent with the need for decentralized testing. The simplicity of the assay should enable testing in a wide variety of laboratory settings, including remote laboratories that are not capable of performing highly complex nucleic acid amplification tests, and during outbreaks where time to detection is critical.« less
 [1] ;  [2] ;  [3] ;  [4] ;  [5] ;  [4] ;  [4] ;  [5] ;  [5] ;  [5] ;  [5] ;  [5] ;  [5] ;  [6] ;  [6] ;  [6] ;  [7] ;  [8] ;  [9] ;  [10] more »;  [5] « less
  1. Stanford Univ. School of Medicine, CA (United States). Dept. of Pathology; Stanford Univ. School of Medicine, CA (United States). Dept. of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine
  2. Stanford Univ. School of Medicine, CA (United States). Dept. of Pathology
  3. Stanford Univ. School of Medicine, CA (United States). Dept. of Pathology; Stanford Health Care and Stanford Children’s Health, Palo Alto, CA (United States)
  4. Cepheid, Solna (Sweden)
  5. Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA (United States)
  6. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
  7. Univ. of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX (United States)
  8. Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB (Canada)
  9. Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB (Canada)
  10. Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna (Sweden)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
Grant/Contract Number:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 10; Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 1932-6203
Public Library of Science
Research Org:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org:
USDOE; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Country of Publication:
United States