skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Mapping and simulating systematics due to spatially varying observing conditions in DES science verification data

Journal Article · · The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series (Online)
ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more »; ; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ; ; ; « less

Spatially-varying depth and characteristics of observing conditions, such as seeing, airmass, or sky background, are major sources of systematic uncertainties in modern galaxy survey analyses, in particular in deep multi-epoch surveys. We present a framework to extract and project these sources of systematics onto the sky, and apply it to the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to map the observing conditions of the Science Verification (SV) data. The resulting distributions and maps of sources of systematics are used in several analyses of DES SV to perform detailed null tests with the data, and also to incorporate systematics in survey simulations. We illustrate the complementarity of these two approaches by comparing the SV data with the BCC-UFig, a synthetic sky catalogue generated by forward-modelling of the DES SV images. We then analyse the BCC-UFig simulation to construct galaxy samples mimicking those used in SV galaxy clustering studies. We show that the spatially-varying survey depth imprinted in the observed galaxy densities and the redshift distributions of the SV data are successfully reproduced by the simulation and well-captured by the maps of observing conditions. The combined use of the maps, the SV data and the BCC-UFig simulation allows us to quantify the impact of spatial systematics on N(z), the redshift distributions inferred using photometric redshifts. We conclude that spatial systematics in the SV data are mainly due to seeing fluctuations and are under control in current clustering and weak lensing analyses. However, they will need to be carefully characterised in upcoming phases of DES in order to avoid biasing the inferred cosmological results. The framework presented is relevant to all multi-epoch surveys, and will be essential for exploiting future surveys such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, which will require detailed null-tests and realistic end-to-end image simulations to correctly interpret the deep, high-cadence observations of the sky.

Research Organization:
SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States); Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Contributing Organization:
DES Collaboration; DES
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-76SF00515; AC02-07CH11359
OSTI ID:
1348239
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1223239
Report Number(s):
FERMILAB-PUB-15-310-A-AE; arXiv:1507.05647; TRN: US1701511
Journal Information:
The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series (Online), Vol. 226, Issue 2; ISSN 1538-4365
Publisher:
American Astronomical Society/IOPCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 40 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (33)

Planck 2013 results. XII. Diffuse component separation journal October 2014
Characterizing unknown systematics in large scale structure surveys journal April 2014
Bayesian Photometric Redshift Estimation journal June 2000
An Ultra Fast Image Generator (UFig) for wide-field astronomy journal February 2013
SExtractor: Software for source extraction journal June 1996
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the selection function and z= 0.6 galaxy power spectrum: WiggleZ survey: selection function journal May 2010
Representations of celestial coordinates in FITS journal November 2002
TPZ: photometric redshift PDFs and ancillary information by using prediction trees and random forests journal May 2013
Exhausting the information: novel Bayesian combination of photometric redshift PDFs journal June 2014
Improving the LSST dithering pattern and cadence for dark energy studies conference August 2014
Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology journal July 2006
Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in the DES Science Verification data journal December 2015
The Blanco Cosmology Survey: data Acquisition, Processing, Calibration, Quality Diagnostics, and data Release journal September 2012
CMB lensing tomography with the DES Science Verification galaxies journal January 2016
HEALPix: A Framework for High‐Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere journal April 2005
The 2.5 m Telescope of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey journal April 2006
A scheme to deal accurately and efficiently with complex angular masks in galaxy surveys journal March 2004
Clustering of Sloan Digital sky Survey iii Photometric Luminous Galaxies: the Measurement, Systematics, and Cosmological Implications journal November 2012
Toward Precision LSST Weak-Lensing Measurement. I. Impacts of Atmospheric Turbulence and Optical Aberration journal May 2011
Exploiting the full potential of photometric quasar surveys: optimal power spectra through blind mitigation of systematics journal August 2014
Estimating the large-scale angular power spectrum in the presence of systematics: a case study of Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasars journal September 2013
The APM Galaxy Survey -- III. An analysis of systematic errors in the angular correlation function and cosmological implications journal December 1996
Mass and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters from Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data journal March 2015
The Dark Energy Survey data processing and calibration system conference September 2012
Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in the angular clustering of galaxies: a study using the SDSS-III: Ameliorating systematic uncertainties in w(θ) journal September 2011
The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering journal June 2012
Photometric redshift analysis in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data journal October 2014
Analysis of Systematic Effects and Statistical Uncertainties in Angular Clustering of Galaxies from Early Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data journal November 2002
Exact likelihood evaluations and foreground marginalization in low resolution WMAP data journal June 2004
No galaxy left behind: accurate measurements with the faintest objects in the Dark Energy Survey journal January 2016
Methods for rapidly processing angular masks of next-generation galaxy surveys journal July 2008
How to measure CMB power spectra without losing information journal May 1997
Measuring the Galaxy Power Spectrum with Future Redshift Surveys journal June 1998

Cited By (23)

ICE-COLA: fast simulations for weak lensing observables journal October 2017
Large-scale retrospective relative spectrophotometric self-calibration in space journal February 2017
A catalogue of structural and morphological measurements for DES Y1 journal July 2018
Measuring linear and non-linear galaxy bias using counts-in-cells in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data journal October 2018
Weak lensing magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data journal February 2018
A unified pseudo- C ℓ framework journal January 2019
Galaxies in X-ray selected clusters and groups in Dark Energy Survey data – II. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of the red-sequence galaxy luminosity function journal June 2019
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: constraints on intrinsic alignments and their colour dependence from galaxy clustering and weak lensing journal August 2019
Producing a BOSS CMASS sample with DES imaging journal September 2019
Constraints on Cosmology and Baryonic Feedback with the Deep Lens Survey Using Galaxy–Galaxy and Galaxy–Mass Power Spectra journal January 2019
Hierarchical Modeling and Statistical Calibration for Photometric Redshifts journal August 2019
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology journal April 2018
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology text January 2018
Large-scale retrospective relative spectro-photometric self-calibration in space text January 2016
ICE-COLA: fast simulations for weak lensing observables text January 2017
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Photometric Data Set for Cosmology text January 2017
Galaxies in X-ray Selected Clusters and Groups in Dark Energy Survey Data II: Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling of the Red-Sequence Galaxy Luminosity Function preprint January 2017
Hierarchical modeling and statistical calibration for photometric redshifts text January 2018
Constraints on Cosmology and Baryonic Feedback with the Deep Lens Survey Using Galaxy-Galaxy and Galaxy-Mass Power Spectra text January 2018
Measuring Linear and Non-linear Galaxy Bias Using Counts-in-Cells in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data text January 2018
A catalogue of structural and morphological measurements for DES Y1 text January 2018
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Intrinsic Alignments and their Colour Dependence from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing text January 2018
Producing a BOSS-CMASS sample with DES imaging text January 2019