skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Response of Aquatic Invertebrates to Ecological Rehabilitation of Southeastern USA Depressional Wetlands

Journal Article · · Wetlands
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [1]
  1. Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States). Dept. of Entomology
  2. South Carolina Dept. of Natural Resources, Eastover, SC (United States); Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River Ecology Lab. (SREL)
  3. Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River Ecology Lab. (SREL)
  4. Univ. of North Georgia-Oconee, Watkinsville, GA (United States). Dept. of Biology

We assessed aquatic invertebrate response to ecological rehabilitation treatment in 20 depression wetlands on the Savannah River Site, South Carolina, USA. All wetlands had been ditched for 50+ years. Sixteen of the 20 wetlands received rehabilitation treatment, and four wetlands remained untreated as a control group. Treatment included logging of all trees, plugging drainage ditches, and planting wetland trees and grasses. Hydroperiods were consequently extended in most of the treatment wetlands. As part a larger study, we sampled macroinvertebrates and microcrustaceans during the pre-habilitation (1998–2000) and rehabilitation (2001–2003) phases. Our study spanned 2 years of high rainfall (1998 and 2003) and 4 years of low rainfall (1999–2002). Samples were collected bimonthly from any wetlands holding water. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in treatment wetlands in 2003 had changed from previous years (1998–2002) and compared to control wetlands (1998–2003), with abundances of Baetidae, Coenagrionidae, Dytiscidae, Chironomidae, and Chaoboridae driving variation. For microcrustaceans (Copepoda and Branchiopoda, including Cladocera, Anostraca and Laevicaudata), assemblage composition and species richness responded mainly to hydrologic conditions. Rehabilitation efforts in these wetlands induced diverse and abundant invertebrate communities to develop, but some responses appeared opportunistic; several taxa that benefitted were not typical residents of depressional wetlands in the region.

Research Organization:
USDA Forest Service-Savannah River, New Ellenton, SC (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security (AU), Office of Security
Grant/Contract Number:
AI09-00SR22188
OSTI ID:
1191534
Report Number(s):
USDA-15-09-P; USDA--15-09-P
Journal Information:
Wetlands, Vol. 35, Issue 4; ISSN 0277-5212
Publisher:
SpringerCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 8 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (27)

Evaluating Hydroperiod Response in Restored Carolina Bay Wetlands Using Soil Physicochemical Properties journal December 2008
Ecology of Insect Communities in Nontidal Wetlands journal January 1996
Vegetation changes and land-use legacies of depression wetlands of the western coastal plain of South Carolina: 1951–1992 journal December 1996
Mechanisms Creating Community Structure Across a Freshwater Habitat Gradient journal November 1996
The Seemingly Intractable Ecological Responses of Invertebrates in North American Wetlands: A Review journal December 2012
Zooplankton in Rainbow Bay, a Carolina bay pond: population dynamics in a temporary habitat journal December 1990
A comparison of natural and created depressional wetlands in central Oklahoma using metrics from indices of biological integrity journal December 2007
Species Richness of Calanoid Copepods, Cladocerans and Other Branchiopods in Carolina Bay Temporary Ponds journal April 1990
The Carolina Bay Restoration Project - Final Report 2000-2006. report December 2007
Influences of riparian logging on plants and invertebrates in small, depressional wetlands of Georgia, U.S.A. journal January 2000
Abundance, biomass and production of aquatic invertebrates in Rainbow Bay, a temporary wetland in South Carolina, USA [Abundance, biomass and production of aquatic invertebrates in Rainbow Bay, a temporary wetland in South Carolina, USA] journal November 1998
Habitat Duration and Community Structure in Temporary Ponds journal March 1996
Spatial and temporal variation in invertebrate consumer diets in forested and herbaceous wetlands journal June 2010
Nestedness and successional trajectories of macroinvertebrate assemblages in man-made wetlands journal September 2012
Hydrology, Community Structure, and Productivity Patterns of a Dystrophic Carolina Bay Wetland journal February 1989
Assessing Congruence and Surrogacy Among Wetland Macroinvertebrate Taxa Towards Efficiently Measuring Biodiversity journal July 2014
Long-term vegetation development of restored prairie pothole wetlands journal December 2008
Absence of species replacements between permanent and temporary lentic communities in New Zealand journal March 2009
Invertebrates that aestivate in dry basins of Carolina bay wetlands journal December 2002
Macroinvertebrate communities in restored and natural Platte River slough wetlands journal September 2008
Insect Emergence from a South Carolina (USA) Temporary Wetland Pond, with Emphasis on the Chironomidae (Diptera) journal March 1998
The influence of sampling method on the classification of wetland macroinvertebrate communities journal April 1993
Ecological Outcomes and Evaluation of Success in Passively Restored Southeastern Depressional Wetlands journal November 2010
Relationships between environmental characteristics and macroinvertebrate communities in seasonal woodland ponds of Minnesota journal January 2004
Macroinvertebrate Responses to Wetland Restoration in Northern New York journal October 1997
Weak Relationships Between Environmental Factors and Invertebrate Communities in Constructed Wetlands journal December 2013
Microcrustaceans (Branchipoda and Copepoda) of Wetland Impoundments on the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina report September 2005

Cited By (1)

Aquatic macroinvertebrate community responses to wetland mitigation in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem journal March 2019