Environmental Tradeoffs of Stover Removal and Erosion in Indiana
When considering the market for biomass from corn stover resources erosion and soil quality issues are important to consider. Removal of stover can be beneficial in some areas, especially when coordinated with other conservation practices, such as vegetative barrier strips and cover crops. However, benefits are highly dependent on several factors, namely if farmers see costs and benefits associated with erosion and the tradeoffs with the removal of biomass. Although typically considered an internal cost, the implication is important to policy and contracting for biomass. This paper uses results from an integrated RUSLE2/WEPS model to incorporate six different regime choices, covering management, harvest and conservation, into a simple profit maximization model to show these tradeoffs explicitly. The results of this work show how different costs for erosion, biomass and conservation managements will affect behavior. If erosion prices are low and no conservation requirement exists, biomass removal will significantly increase erosion, but only in some areas. Alternatively, when erosion prices are high, farmers will parallel socially optimal levels of erosion and conservation management practices can be incentivized through access to a market for stover.
- Research Organization:
- Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- DOE - EE
- DOE Contract Number:
- DE-AC07-05ID14517
- OSTI ID:
- 1063297
- Report Number(s):
- INL/JOU-12-27266
- Journal Information:
- Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining, Vol. 7, Issue 1; ISSN 1932-104X
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Modeled Impacts of Cover Crops and Vegetative Barriers on Corn Stover Availability and Soil Quality
Effects of corn stover year-to-year supply variability and market structure on biomass utilization and cost