The Treatment of ISI Uncertainty in xLPR
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in cooperation with the nuclear industry is constructing an improved probabilistic fracture model for 'extremely Low Probability of Rupture' in the piping of a nuclear power plant called xLPR. This paper focuses on the xLPR model's treatment of uncertainty for in-service inspection. In the xLPR model, uncertainty is classified as either aleatory or epistemic, and both types of uncertainty are described with probability distributions. Earlier PFM models included aleatory, but ignored epistemic, uncertainty, or attempted to deal with epistemic uncertainty by use of conservative bounds. Thus, inclusion of both types of uncertainty in xLPR should produce more realistic results than the earlier models. This work shows that by including epistemic uncertainty in the xLPR ISI module, there can be a significant effect on rupture probability; however, this depends upon the specific scenarios being studied. Some simple scenarios are presented to illustrate those where there is no effect and those having a significant effect on the probability of rupture.
- Research Organization:
- Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-76RL01830
- OSTI ID:
- 1038399
- Report Number(s):
- PNNL-SA-78886; 401001060; TRN: US1201853
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: Proceedings of teh ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (PVP 2011), July 17-21, 2011, Baltimore, Maryland, Paper No. PVP2011-57975
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Impact of Uncertainty on Calculations for Recovery from Loss of Offsite Power
Uncertainties in Local Intense Precipitation Flood Modeling