DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Nuclear Science for the Manhattan Project and Comparison to Today’s ENDF Data

Abstract

Nuclear physics advances in the United States and Britain from 1939 to 1945 are described. The Manhattan Project’s work led to an explosion in our knowledge of nuclear science. A conference in April 1943 at Los Alamos provided a simple formula used to compute critical masses and laid out the research program needed to determine the key nuclear constants. In short order, four university accelerators were disassembled and reassembled at Los Alamos, and methods were established to make measurements on extremely small samples owing to the initial lack of availability of enriched 235U and plutonium. I trace the program that measured fission cross sections, fission-emitted neutron multiplicities and their energy spectra, and transport cross sections, comparing the measurements with our best understanding today as embodied in the Evaluated Nuclear Data File ENDF/B-VIII.0. The large nuclear data uncertainties at the beginning of the project, which often exceeded 25% to 50%, were reduced by 1945 often to less than 5% to 10%. Uranium-235 and plutonium-239 fission cross-section assessments in the fast mega-electron-volt range were reduced following more accurate measurements, and the neutron multiplicity $$\overline{v}$$ increased. By a lucky coincidence of canceling errors, the initial critical mass estimates were close to the final estimated masses. Some images from historical documents from our Los Alamos archives are shown. Many of the original measurements from these early years have not previously been widely available. Through this work, these data have now been archived in the international experimental nuclear reaction data library (EXFOR) in a collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency and Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
Contributing Org.:
Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)
OSTI Identifier:
1972173
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-20-30028
Journal ID: ISSN 0029-5450; TRN: US2313769
Grant/Contract Number:  
89233218CNA000001
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Nuclear Technology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 207; Journal Issue: sup1; Journal ID: ISSN 0029-5450
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; nuclear science; Manhattan Project; ENDF nuclear data

Citation Formats

Chadwick, Mark B. Nuclear Science for the Manhattan Project and Comparison to Today’s ENDF Data. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1080/00295450.2021.1901002.
Chadwick, Mark B. Nuclear Science for the Manhattan Project and Comparison to Today’s ENDF Data. United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1901002
Chadwick, Mark B. Tue . "Nuclear Science for the Manhattan Project and Comparison to Today’s ENDF Data". United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1901002. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1972173.
@article{osti_1972173,
title = {Nuclear Science for the Manhattan Project and Comparison to Today’s ENDF Data},
author = {Chadwick, Mark B.},
abstractNote = {Nuclear physics advances in the United States and Britain from 1939 to 1945 are described. The Manhattan Project’s work led to an explosion in our knowledge of nuclear science. A conference in April 1943 at Los Alamos provided a simple formula used to compute critical masses and laid out the research program needed to determine the key nuclear constants. In short order, four university accelerators were disassembled and reassembled at Los Alamos, and methods were established to make measurements on extremely small samples owing to the initial lack of availability of enriched 235U and plutonium. I trace the program that measured fission cross sections, fission-emitted neutron multiplicities and their energy spectra, and transport cross sections, comparing the measurements with our best understanding today as embodied in the Evaluated Nuclear Data File ENDF/B-VIII.0. The large nuclear data uncertainties at the beginning of the project, which often exceeded 25% to 50%, were reduced by 1945 often to less than 5% to 10%. Uranium-235 and plutonium-239 fission cross-section assessments in the fast mega-electron-volt range were reduced following more accurate measurements, and the neutron multiplicity $\overline{v}$ increased. By a lucky coincidence of canceling errors, the initial critical mass estimates were close to the final estimated masses. Some images from historical documents from our Los Alamos archives are shown. Many of the original measurements from these early years have not previously been widely available. Through this work, these data have now been archived in the international experimental nuclear reaction data library (EXFOR) in a collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency and Brookhaven National Laboratory.},
doi = {10.1080/00295450.2021.1901002},
journal = {Nuclear Technology},
number = sup1,
volume = 207,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Nov 16 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Tue Nov 16 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Critical Assemblies: Dragon Burst Assembly and Solution Assemblies
journal, November 2021


Weapons Radiochemistry: Trinity and Beyond
journal, November 2021


Neutron Cross Sections of the Elements A Compilation
journal, October 1947


The Los Alamos Computing Facility During the Manhattan Project
journal, November 2021


The Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum of 235 U( n , f ) below 2.5 MeV for Incident Neutrons from 0.7 to 20 MeV
journal, February 2018


The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission
journal, September 1939


Evaluation and use of the prompt fission neutron spectrum and spectra covariance matrices in criticality and shielding
journal, November 2009

  • Kodeli, Ivan; Trkov, Andrej; Capote, Roberto
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 610, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2009.08.076

Cross Sections for 239 Pu( n , f ) and 241 Pu( n , f ) in the Range E n = 0.01 eV to 200 MeV
journal, June 2010

  • Tovesson, F.; Hill, T. S.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 165, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE09-41

Critical conditions in neutron multiplication
journal, November 1939

  • Peierls, R.
  • Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 35, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1017/S030500410002137X

Comparison Between Historic Nuclear Explosion Yield Formulas
journal, November 2021


Fission Product Data Measured at Los Alamos for Fission Spectrum and Thermal Neutrons on 239Pu, 235U, 238U
journal, December 2010


ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data
journal, December 2011


ENDF/B-VII.0: Next Generation Evaluated Nuclear Data Library for Nuclear Science and Technology
journal, December 2006


Arthur Compton’s 1941 Report on explosive fission of U-235: A look at the physics
journal, December 2007

  • Reed, B. Cameron
  • American Journal of Physics, Vol. 75, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1119/1.2785193

Emission of Neutrons by Uranium
journal, October 1939


A memorandum that changed the world
journal, May 2011

  • Bernstein, Jeremy
  • American Journal of Physics, Vol. 79, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1119/1.3533426

Nuclear Fission
journal, January 1940


On the Origins of Lagrangian Hydrodynamic Methods
journal, November 2021


The joint evaluated fission and fusion nuclear data library, JEFF-3.3
journal, July 2020


Canadian Contributions to the Manhattan Project and Early Nuclear Research
journal, November 2021


The Taming of Plutonium: Plutonium Metallurgy and the Manhattan Project
journal, November 2021


The Los Alamos Neutron Science Center
journal, June 2006

  • Lisowski, Paul W.; Schoenberg, Kurt F.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 562, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.02.178

Criticality Experiments with Fast 235 U and 239 Pu Metal and Hydride Systems During the Manhattan Project
journal, November 2021


Prompt Fission Neutron Spectra of Actinides
journal, January 2016


Trinity by the Numbers: The Computing Effort that Made Trinity Possible
journal, November 2021


Neutronics Calculation Advances at Los Alamos: Manhattan Project to Monte Carlo
journal, November 2021


Comparison of Results from Recent NNSA and CEA Measurements of the 239Pu(n, f) Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum
journal, March 2021


Unrecognized Sources of Uncertainties (USU) in Experimental Nuclear Data
journal, January 2020


Energy of Neutrons liberated in the Nuclear Fission of Uranium induced by Thermal Neutrons
journal, June 1939

  • Von Halban, H.; Joliot, F.; Kowarski, L.
  • Nature, Vol. 143, Issue 3631
  • DOI: 10.1038/143939a0

Fission Neutron Spectrum ofU235
journal, March 1953


The Neutron-Proton and Neutron-Carbon Scattering Cross Sections for Fast Neutrons
journal, November 1946

  • Bailey, Carl L.; Bennett, William E.; Bergstralth, Thor
  • Physical Review, Vol. 70, Issue 9-10
  • DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.70.583

Critical Assembly
book, January 2010


Who Invented the Trinity Nuclear Test’s Christy Gadget? Patents and Evidence from the Archives
journal, November 2021


A Photographic Plate Spectrum of the Neutrons from the Disintegration of Lithium by Deuterons
journal, May 1941


Energy Spectrum of Neutrons from Thermal Fission of U 235
journal, September 1952