DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat

Abstract

Agricultural yields are highly susceptible to changes in weather system patterns, including both annual and sub-annual changes in temperature and precipitation. Understanding the impacts of future changes in meteorological variables on crop yields have been widely studied in both empirical and process-based models. This work presents a structural econometric approach that combines historical weather data with information about the biophysical growth cycles of maize, winter wheat, and soy to predict the year-to-year yield responses for rainfed crops. Modeled soil moisture and temperature are taken as key predictors, which allows testing the fitted rainfed model’s ability to predict irrigated yields by assuming irrigation produces the numerically optimal level of soil moisture. This approach is grounded in known biophysical processes, which improves confidence in the model predictions. It produces estimates of interannual variability in yields, which enable study of the effects of extreme events on agricultural productivity. Finally, it enables prediction of the potential impacts of changing weather patterns on irrigated crops in areas that are currently primarily rainfed. We present the results of the empirical model, fitted with rainfed data; out-of-sample validation on irrigated crops; and projections of yield shocks under multiple future climate scenarios. Under a bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenario,more » this approach predicts average yield change, relative to 2006-2020 average yields, across U.S. counties in the 2040-2060 period of -16.9% and -13.4% for rainfed and irrigated maize, of -19.1% and -18.4% for rainfed and irrigated soy, and of -4.0% and -2.0% for rainfed and irrigated winter wheat. And in the 2070-2090 period of -30.3% and -28.8 % for rainfed and irrigated maize, of -33.1% and -32.8% for rainfed and irrigated soy, and of -6.5% and -5.2%for rainfed and irrigated winter wheat.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  2. University of Maryland, Frostburg, MD (United States). Center for Environmental Science
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1821863
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-155872
Journal ID: ISSN 1748-9326
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Environmental Research Letters
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 16; Journal Issue: 9; Journal ID: ISSN 1748-9326
Publisher:
IOP Publishing
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; agricultural impacts; agricultural responses; structural econometric modeling; biophysical growth stages

Citation Formats

Snyder, Abigail C., Waldhoff, Stephanie T., Ollenberger, Mary, and Zhang, Ying. Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac15ce.
Snyder, Abigail C., Waldhoff, Stephanie T., Ollenberger, Mary, & Zhang, Ying. Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat. United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac15ce
Snyder, Abigail C., Waldhoff, Stephanie T., Ollenberger, Mary, and Zhang, Ying. Thu . "Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat". United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac15ce. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1821863.
@article{osti_1821863,
title = {Empirical estimation of weather-driven yield shocks using biophysical characteristics for U.S. rainfed and irrigated maize, soybeans, and winter wheat},
author = {Snyder, Abigail C. and Waldhoff, Stephanie T. and Ollenberger, Mary and Zhang, Ying},
abstractNote = {Agricultural yields are highly susceptible to changes in weather system patterns, including both annual and sub-annual changes in temperature and precipitation. Understanding the impacts of future changes in meteorological variables on crop yields have been widely studied in both empirical and process-based models. This work presents a structural econometric approach that combines historical weather data with information about the biophysical growth cycles of maize, winter wheat, and soy to predict the year-to-year yield responses for rainfed crops. Modeled soil moisture and temperature are taken as key predictors, which allows testing the fitted rainfed model’s ability to predict irrigated yields by assuming irrigation produces the numerically optimal level of soil moisture. This approach is grounded in known biophysical processes, which improves confidence in the model predictions. It produces estimates of interannual variability in yields, which enable study of the effects of extreme events on agricultural productivity. Finally, it enables prediction of the potential impacts of changing weather patterns on irrigated crops in areas that are currently primarily rainfed. We present the results of the empirical model, fitted with rainfed data; out-of-sample validation on irrigated crops; and projections of yield shocks under multiple future climate scenarios. Under a bias-corrected GFDL RCP8.5 scenario, this approach predicts average yield change, relative to 2006-2020 average yields, across U.S. counties in the 2040-2060 period of -16.9% and -13.4% for rainfed and irrigated maize, of -19.1% and -18.4% for rainfed and irrigated soy, and of -4.0% and -2.0% for rainfed and irrigated winter wheat. And in the 2070-2090 period of -30.3% and -28.8 % for rainfed and irrigated maize, of -33.1% and -32.8% for rainfed and irrigated soy, and of -6.5% and -5.2%for rainfed and irrigated winter wheat.},
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/ac15ce},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
number = 9,
volume = 16,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Aug 12 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Thu Aug 12 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Improving regional winter wheat yield estimation through assimilation of phenology and leaf area index from remote sensing data
journal, November 2018


Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison
journal, December 2013

  • Rosenzweig, Cynthia; Elliott, Joshua; Deryng, Delphine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222463110

On the Validation of Models
journal, July 1981


Future climate impacts on global agricultural yields over the 21st century
journal, October 2020

  • Waldhoff, Stephanie T.; Wing, Ian Sue; Edmonds, James
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abadcb

A Global Hydrologic Framework to Accelerate Scientific Discovery
journal, January 2019

  • Vernon, Chris R.; Hejazi, Mohamad I.; Turner, Sean W. D.
  • Journal of Open Research Software, Vol. 7
  • DOI: 10.5334/jors.245

Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change
journal, August 2009

  • Schlenker, Wolfram; Roberts, Michael J.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, Issue 37
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906865106

Xanthos – A Global Hydrologic Model
journal, September 2017

  • Li, Xinya; Vernon, Chris R.; Hejazi, Mohamad I.
  • Journal of Open Research Software, Vol. 5
  • DOI: 10.5334/jors.181

Irrigation offsets wheat yield reductions from warming temperatures
journal, November 2017

  • Tack, Jesse; Barkley, Andrew; Hendricks, Nathan
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8d27

Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming – simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b)
journal, January 2017

  • Frieler, Katja; Lange, Stefan; Piontek, Franziska
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017

Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming
journal, March 2007


The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for Phase 1 (v1.0)
journal, January 2015

  • Elliott, J.; Müller, C.; Deryng, D.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-261-2015

Integrated assessment of global water scarcity over the 21st century under multiple climate change mitigation policies
journal, January 2014

  • Hejazi, M. I.; Edmonds, J.; Clarke, L.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 18, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-2859-2014

Historical effects of temperature and precipitation on California crop yields
journal, January 2007

  • Lobell, David B.; Cahill, Kimberly Nicholas; Field, Christopher B.
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 81, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-006-9141-3

Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications
journal, January 2017

  • Müller, Christoph; Elliott, Joshua; Chryssanthacopoulos, James
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 10, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-1403-2017

Unpacking the climatic drivers of US agricultural yields
journal, May 2019

  • Ortiz-Bobea, Ariel; Wang, Haoying; Carrillo, Carlos M.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1e75

Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram
journal, April 2001

  • Taylor, Karl E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 106, Issue D7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900719

Humans drive future water scarcity changes across all Shared Socioeconomic Pathways
journal, January 2020

  • Graham, Neal T.; Hejazi, Mohamad I.; Chen, Min
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab639b

An Approach toward a Rational Classification of Climate
journal, January 1948

  • Thornthwaite, C. W.
  • Geographical Review, Vol. 38, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2307/210739

Greater Sensitivity to Drought Accompanies Maize Yield Increase in the U.S. Midwest
journal, May 2014


Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and Its Use to Assess Global and Regional Reference Crop Evaporation over Land during the Twentieth Century
journal, October 2011

  • Weedon, G. P.; Gomes, S.; Viterbo, P.
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 12, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JHM1369.1

Evaluating the effects of climate change on US agricultural systems: sensitivity to regional impact and trade expansion scenarios
journal, June 2018

  • Baker, Justin S.; Havlík, Petr; Beach, Robert
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac1c2

Simulated vs. empirical weather responsiveness of crop yields: US evidence and implications for the agricultural impacts of climate change
journal, July 2017

  • Mistry, Malcolm N.; Sue Wing, Ian; De Cian, Enrica
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa788c

GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems
journal, January 2019

  • Calvin, Katherine; Patel, Pralit; Clarke, Leon
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-677-2019

Changes in rainfed and irrigated crop yield response to climate in the western US
journal, June 2018


Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns: Global crop planting dates
journal, June 2010


Interactions between temperature and drought in global and regional crop yield variability during 1961-2014
journal, May 2017


The effects of climate extremes on global agricultural yields
journal, May 2019

  • Vogel, Elisabeth; Donat, Markus G.; Alexander, Lisa V.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab154b