DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Table of Standard Atomic Weights—an exercise in consensus

Abstract

The present Table of Standard Atomic Weights (TSAW) of the elements is perhaps one of the most familiar datasets in science. Unlike most parameters in physical science whose values and uncertainties are evaluated using the “Guidelines for Uncertainty in Measurement” (GUM), the majority of standard atomic-weight values and their uncertainties are consensus values, not GUM-evaluated values. The Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) regularly evaluates the literature for new isotopic-abundance measurements that can lead to revised standard atomic-weight values, A r(E) for element E. The Commission strives to provide utmost clarity in products it disseminates, namely the TSAW and the Table of Isotopic Compositions of the Elements (TICE). In 2016, it was recognized by the Commission that a guideline recommending expression of uncertainty listed in parentheses following the standard atomic-weight value, e.g. A r (Se) = 78.971(8), is not in accord with the GUM, which suggests that this parenthetic notation be reserved to express standard uncertainty, not the expanded uncertainty used in the TSAW and TICE. In 2017, to eliminate this noncompliance with the GUM, a new format was adopted in which the uncertainty value is specified by themore » plus-minus symbol, e.g. A r (Se) = 78.971 ± 0.008. To clarify the definition of uncertainty, a new footnote has been added to the TSAW. This footnote emphasizes that an atomic-weight uncertainty is a consensus (decisional) uncertainty. Not only has the Commission shielded users of the TSAW and TICE from unreliable measurements that appear in the literature as a result of unduly small uncertainties, but the aim of IUPAC has been fulfilled by which any scientist, taking any natural sample from commerce or research, can expect their sample atomic weight to lie within A r(E) ± its uncertainty almost all of the time.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [6]
  1. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA (United States)
  2. Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing (China). Inst. of Mineral Resources
  4. Univ. of Groningen (The Netherlands). Centre for Isotope Research (CIO)
  5. Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und ‐prüfung (BAM), Berlin (Germany)
  6. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing (China). Inst. of Geology
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP)
OSTI Identifier:
1618411
Report Number(s):
BNL-215913-2020-JAAM
Journal ID: ISSN 0951-4198
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0012704
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 36; Journal Issue: 15; Journal ID: ISSN 0951-4198
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; decisional uncertainty; normal materials; conventional atomic weight; TSAW; TICE

Citation Formats

Coplen, Tyler B., Holden, Norman E., Ding, Tiping, Meijer, Harro A. J., Vogl, Jochen, and Zhu, Xiangkun. The Table of Standard Atomic Weights—an exercise in consensus. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1002/rcm.8864.
Coplen, Tyler B., Holden, Norman E., Ding, Tiping, Meijer, Harro A. J., Vogl, Jochen, & Zhu, Xiangkun. The Table of Standard Atomic Weights—an exercise in consensus. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8864
Coplen, Tyler B., Holden, Norman E., Ding, Tiping, Meijer, Harro A. J., Vogl, Jochen, and Zhu, Xiangkun. Fri . "The Table of Standard Atomic Weights—an exercise in consensus". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8864. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1618411.
@article{osti_1618411,
title = {The Table of Standard Atomic Weights—an exercise in consensus},
author = {Coplen, Tyler B. and Holden, Norman E. and Ding, Tiping and Meijer, Harro A. J. and Vogl, Jochen and Zhu, Xiangkun},
abstractNote = {The present Table of Standard Atomic Weights (TSAW) of the elements is perhaps one of the most familiar datasets in science. Unlike most parameters in physical science whose values and uncertainties are evaluated using the “Guidelines for Uncertainty in Measurement” (GUM), the majority of standard atomic-weight values and their uncertainties are consensus values, not GUM-evaluated values. The Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) regularly evaluates the literature for new isotopic-abundance measurements that can lead to revised standard atomic-weight values, A r(E) for element E. The Commission strives to provide utmost clarity in products it disseminates, namely the TSAW and the Table of Isotopic Compositions of the Elements (TICE). In 2016, it was recognized by the Commission that a guideline recommending expression of uncertainty listed in parentheses following the standard atomic-weight value, e.g. A r (Se) = 78.971(8), is not in accord with the GUM, which suggests that this parenthetic notation be reserved to express standard uncertainty, not the expanded uncertainty used in the TSAW and TICE. In 2017, to eliminate this noncompliance with the GUM, a new format was adopted in which the uncertainty value is specified by the plus-minus symbol, e.g. A r (Se) = 78.971 ± 0.008. To clarify the definition of uncertainty, a new footnote has been added to the TSAW. This footnote emphasizes that an atomic-weight uncertainty is a consensus (decisional) uncertainty. Not only has the Commission shielded users of the TSAW and TICE from unreliable measurements that appear in the literature as a result of unduly small uncertainties, but the aim of IUPAC has been fulfilled by which any scientist, taking any natural sample from commerce or research, can expect their sample atomic weight to lie within A r(E) ± its uncertainty almost all of the time.},
doi = {10.1002/rcm.8864},
journal = {Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry},
number = 15,
volume = 36,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Jun 19 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Fri Jun 19 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Figures / Tables:

Figure 1 Figure 1: Legend of the IUPAC Periodic Table of the Elements and Isotopes (prepared by and used with permission of Sara Glidewell).

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Atomic weights of the elements 1995 (Technical Report)
journal, January 1996


Tables and charts for isotope-abundance variations and atomic weights of selected elements: 2016
dataset, January 2016

  • Coplen, Tyler B.; Shrestha, Yesha
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • DOI: 10.5066/f7gf0rn2

Absolute Isotopic Abundance Ratio and Atomic Weight of a Reference Sample of Gallium
journal, November 1986

  • Machlan, L. A.; Gramlich, J. W.; Powell, L. J.
  • Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Vol. 91, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.6028/jres.091.036

Report of the International Commission on Atomic Weights * (1961)
journal, November 1962

  • Cameron, A. E.; Wichers, Edward.
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 84, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1021/ja00881a001

Variation of lead isotopic composition and atomic weight in terrestrial materials (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, October 2020

  • Zhu, Xiang-Kun; Benefield, Jacqueline; Coplen, Tyler B.
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 93, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2018-0916

Assessment of international reference materials for isotope-ratio analysis (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, March 2014

  • Brand, Willi A.; Coplen, Tyler B.; Vogl, Jochen
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 86, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2013-1023

Atomic weights of the elements 2005 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, January 2006


Errata: Atomic weights of the elements: Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, July 2009


The AME2016 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references
journal, March 2017


Atomic weights of the elements 1981
journal, January 1983


Isotope-abundance variations of selected elements (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, January 2002

  • Coplen, Tyler B.; Böhlke, John Karl; De Bièvre, P.
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 74, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1351/pac200274101987

Clarification of the term “normal material” used for standard atomic weights (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, July 2018

  • Coplen, Tyler B.; Holden, Norman E.; Wieser, Michael E.
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 90, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2017-0301

Expression of the Uncertainties of Final Results
journal, June 1968


Atomic weights of the elements 1983
journal, January 1984


Atomic weights of the elements 2009 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, December 2010


Atomic weights of the elements 2011 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, April 2013

  • Wieser, Michael E.; Holden, Norman; Coplen, Tyler B.
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 85, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1351/PAC-REP-13-03-02

Atomic weights of the elements 2007 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, September 2009


Standard atomic weights of the elements 2021 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, May 2022

  • Prohaska, Thomas; Irrgeher, Johanna; Benefield, Jacqueline
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 94, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2019-0603

Interpreting and propagating the uncertainty of the standard atomic weights (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, October 2017

  • Possolo, Antonio; van der Veen, Adriaan M. H.; Meija, Juris
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 90, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2016-0402

'Atomic weight': The name, its history, definition, and units
journal, January 1992


Atomic weights of the elements. Review 2000 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, January 2003

  • de Laeter, John R.; Böhlke, John Karl; De Bièvre, P.
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 75, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1351/pac200375060683

IUPAC Periodic Table of the Elements and Isotopes (IPTEI) for the Education Community (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, December 2018

  • Holden, Norman E.; Coplen, Tyler B.; Böhlke, John K.
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 90, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2015-0703

Isotope-abundance variations and atomic weights of selected elements: 2016 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, December 2016

  • Coplen, Tyler B.; Shrestha, Yesha
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 88, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2016-0302

Atomic weights of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, March 2016

  • Meija, Juris; Coplen, Tyler B.; Berglund, Michael
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 88, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2015-0305

Isotopic compositions of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, March 2016

  • Meija, Juris; Coplen, Tyler B.; Berglund, Michael
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 88, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2015-0503

Errata. Element by element review of their atomic weights. Commission on Atomic Weights and Isotopic Abundances. Pure Appl. Chem. 56, 695-768 (1984).
journal, January 2007

  • Peiser, H. S.; Holden, N. E.; De Bièvre, P.
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 79, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1351/pac200779050951

Erratum to: Isotope-abundance variations and atomic weights of selected elements: 2016 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, January 2019

  • Coplen, Tyler B.; Shrestha, Yesha
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 91, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1515/pac-2018-0504

Atomic Weights of the Elements 1997
journal, August 1999


Unnatural Isotopic Composition of Lithium Reagents
journal, October 1997

  • Qi, H. P.; Coplen, Tyler B.; Wang, Q. Zh.
  • Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 69, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1021/ac9704669

Errata: Atomic weights of the elements: (Technical Report)
journal, September 1999


An Assessment of the Reliability of Atomic Weight Data Based on Successive Evaluations Between 1967 and 1993
journal, May 1994

  • De Bièvre, P.; Ku, H. H.; Peiser, H. S.
  • Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, Vol. 23, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.555946

Tables and charts for isotope-abundance variations and atomic weights of selected elements: 2016
dataset, January 2016

  • Coplen, Tyler B.; Shrestha, Yesha
  • U.S. Geological Survey
  • DOI: 10.5066/f7gf0rn2

Calibrated measurements of the isotopic composition and atomic weight of the natural Li isotopic reference material IRMM-016
journal, December 1997

  • Qi, H. P.; Taylor, P. D. P.; Berglund, M.
  • International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes, Vol. 171, Issue 1-3
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1176(97)00125-0