DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Applying a Template of Expected Uncertainties to Updating 239Pu(n,f) Cross-section Covariances in the Neutron Data Standards Database

Abstract

Templates of uncertainties expected in specific measurement types were recently developed. One aim of these templates is to help evaluators in identifying (1) missing or suspiciously low uncertainties and (2) missing correlations between uncertainties of the same and different experiments, when estimating covariances for experimental data employed in their evaluations. These templates also provide realistic estimates of standard deviations and correlations for a particular uncertainty source and measurement type that can be used by evaluators in situations where they are not supplied by the experimenters. This information allows for a more comprehensive uncertainty analysis across all measurements considered in an evaluation and, thus, more realistic evaluated covariances. Here, in this work, we extend a template that is applicable to uncertainties expected in neutron-induced fission, (n,f), cross-section measurements. It is applied to improving covariances of 239Pu(n,f) cross-section measurements in the database underlying the Neutron Data Standards evaluations. This particular example was chosen since this evaluation is primarily based on experimental information. Also, some uncertainties of individual 239Pu(n,f) cross-section experiments in this database were suspected to be underestimated. The evaluated uncertainties obtained after updating the covariances in the database by means of the template indeed do increase compared to their original values.more » Even more importantly, the evaluated mean values change noticeably. These modified cross sections impact application calculations significantly, as is demonstrated by employing them in simulations of the effective neutron multiplication factor for a few selected critical assemblies. However, this updated evaluated 239Pu(n,f) cross section should not be interpreted as the final one that should replace values of the current Neutron Data Standards project. Evaluations for the Neutron Data Standards of the 239Pu(n,f) cross section must be linked to many other observables included in the associated database, most notably to cross sections for 235U(n,f), but also to those for 10B(n,α), 6Li(n,t), 238U(n,f), and 238U(n,γ), because of included measurements of the 239Pu(n,f) cross section that appear as ratios to these reactions. Some of these other reactions are correlated to further observables in the database. Hence, updating uncertainties of data sets of any of these observables can potentially impact the 239Pu(n,f) cross section. Uncertainties for all measurements of these linked physical observables have to be updated before a comprehensive evaluation of the 239Pu(n,f) cross section and its corresponding uncertainties can be provided.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [4]; ORCiD logo [1];  [5];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [5]; ORCiD logo [1];  [5];  [5];  [5]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  2. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
  3. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States); National Nuclear Security Agency, Washington, DC (United States)
  4. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria)
  5. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
  6. National Inst. of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD (United States)
  7. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551-0808, USA
  8. State Corporation Rosatom, Moscow (Russia). PI Atomstandart; International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (Austria)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States); Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1601400
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1605061
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-19-23127; LLNL-JRNL-783165
Journal ID: ISSN 0090-3752; TRN: US2103637
Grant/Contract Number:  
89233218CNA000001; AC52-07NA27344
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Nuclear Data Sheets
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 163; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0090-3752
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; 239Pu Neutron-induced fission cross-section; Neutron Data Standard; Uncertainty Quantification

Citation Formats

Neudecker, Denise, Smith, Donald L., Tovesson, Fredrik, Capote, Roberto, White, Morgan Curtis, Bowden, Nathaniel S., Snyder, Lucas, Carlson, Allan D., Casperson, Robert J., Pronyaev, Vladimir, Sangiorgio, Samuele, Schmitt, Kyle Thomas, Seilhan, Brandon, Walsh, Nicolas, and Younes, Walid. Applying a Template of Expected Uncertainties to Updating 239Pu(n,f) Cross-section Covariances in the Neutron Data Standards Database. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1016/j.nds.2019.12.005.
Neudecker, Denise, Smith, Donald L., Tovesson, Fredrik, Capote, Roberto, White, Morgan Curtis, Bowden, Nathaniel S., Snyder, Lucas, Carlson, Allan D., Casperson, Robert J., Pronyaev, Vladimir, Sangiorgio, Samuele, Schmitt, Kyle Thomas, Seilhan, Brandon, Walsh, Nicolas, & Younes, Walid. Applying a Template of Expected Uncertainties to Updating 239Pu(n,f) Cross-section Covariances in the Neutron Data Standards Database. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2019.12.005
Neudecker, Denise, Smith, Donald L., Tovesson, Fredrik, Capote, Roberto, White, Morgan Curtis, Bowden, Nathaniel S., Snyder, Lucas, Carlson, Allan D., Casperson, Robert J., Pronyaev, Vladimir, Sangiorgio, Samuele, Schmitt, Kyle Thomas, Seilhan, Brandon, Walsh, Nicolas, and Younes, Walid. Mon . "Applying a Template of Expected Uncertainties to Updating 239Pu(n,f) Cross-section Covariances in the Neutron Data Standards Database". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2019.12.005. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1601400.
@article{osti_1601400,
title = {Applying a Template of Expected Uncertainties to Updating 239Pu(n,f) Cross-section Covariances in the Neutron Data Standards Database},
author = {Neudecker, Denise and Smith, Donald L. and Tovesson, Fredrik and Capote, Roberto and White, Morgan Curtis and Bowden, Nathaniel S. and Snyder, Lucas and Carlson, Allan D. and Casperson, Robert J. and Pronyaev, Vladimir and Sangiorgio, Samuele and Schmitt, Kyle Thomas and Seilhan, Brandon and Walsh, Nicolas and Younes, Walid},
abstractNote = {Templates of uncertainties expected in specific measurement types were recently developed. One aim of these templates is to help evaluators in identifying (1) missing or suspiciously low uncertainties and (2) missing correlations between uncertainties of the same and different experiments, when estimating covariances for experimental data employed in their evaluations. These templates also provide realistic estimates of standard deviations and correlations for a particular uncertainty source and measurement type that can be used by evaluators in situations where they are not supplied by the experimenters. This information allows for a more comprehensive uncertainty analysis across all measurements considered in an evaluation and, thus, more realistic evaluated covariances. Here, in this work, we extend a template that is applicable to uncertainties expected in neutron-induced fission, (n,f), cross-section measurements. It is applied to improving covariances of 239Pu(n,f) cross-section measurements in the database underlying the Neutron Data Standards evaluations. This particular example was chosen since this evaluation is primarily based on experimental information. Also, some uncertainties of individual 239Pu(n,f) cross-section experiments in this database were suspected to be underestimated. The evaluated uncertainties obtained after updating the covariances in the database by means of the template indeed do increase compared to their original values. Even more importantly, the evaluated mean values change noticeably. These modified cross sections impact application calculations significantly, as is demonstrated by employing them in simulations of the effective neutron multiplication factor for a few selected critical assemblies. However, this updated evaluated 239Pu(n,f) cross section should not be interpreted as the final one that should replace values of the current Neutron Data Standards project. Evaluations for the Neutron Data Standards of the 239Pu(n,f) cross section must be linked to many other observables included in the associated database, most notably to cross sections for 235U(n,f), but also to those for 10B(n,α), 6Li(n,t), 238U(n,f), and 238U(n,γ), because of included measurements of the 239Pu(n,f) cross section that appear as ratios to these reactions. Some of these other reactions are correlated to further observables in the database. Hence, updating uncertainties of data sets of any of these observables can potentially impact the 239Pu(n,f) cross section. Uncertainties for all measurements of these linked physical observables have to be updated before a comprehensive evaluation of the 239Pu(n,f) cross section and its corresponding uncertainties can be provided.},
doi = {10.1016/j.nds.2019.12.005},
journal = {Nuclear Data Sheets},
number = C,
volume = 163,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Jan 27 00:00:00 EST 2020},
month = {Mon Jan 27 00:00:00 EST 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 7 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A new approach to measuring fission cross-section ratios
journal, May 1982


Absolute measurements of 235U and 239Pu fission cross-sections with photoneutron sources
journal, January 1978


Fission-Fragment Scattering
journal, June 1966


Cross Sections for 239 Pu( n , f ) and 241 Pu( n , f ) in the Range E n = 0.01 eV to 200 MeV
journal, June 2010

  • Tovesson, F.; Hill, T. S.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 165, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE09-41

A Measurement of the Fission Cross Sections of 239 Pu and 233 U Relative to 235 U
journal, June 1970

  • Pfletschinger, E.; Käppeler, F.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 40, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE70-A20188

Measurement of the Ratios of Capture and Fission Neutron Cross Sections of 235 U, 238 U, and 239 Pu at 130 to 1400 keV
journal, June 1970


Simultaneous Measurement of the Neutron Fission and Absorption Cross Sections of Plutonium-239 Over the Energy Region 0.02 eV to 30 keV
journal, July 1971

  • Gwin, R.; Weston, L. W.; de Saussure, G.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 45, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE71-A20342

A Monte Carlo computer program for the transport of energetic ions in amorphous targets
journal, August 1980


Further Radiochemical Studies of Fission of the U 2 3 6 * Compound Nucleus
journal, October 1962


Fission Fragment Backscattering Corrections to Absolute Fission Counting Rate Measurements
journal, June 1980

  • Coddens, G.; Wagemans, C.; Deruytter, A. J.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 74, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE80-A20125

International Evaluation of Neutron Cross Section Standards
journal, December 2009


The uncertainty of counting at a defined solid angle
journal, May 2015


The fission cross sections of 233U, 234U, 235U, 236U, 237Np 239Pu, 240Pu and 241Pu for 24 keV neutrons
journal, June 1965

  • Perkin, J. L.; White, P. H.; Fieldhouse, P.
  • Journal of Nuclear Energy. Parts A/B. Reactor Science and Technology, Vol. 19, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1016/0368-3230(65)90051-0

A time projection chamber for high accuracy and precision fission cross-section measurements
journal, September 2014

  • Heffner, M.; Asner, D. M.; Baker, R. G.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 759
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2014.05.057

Fragment Anisotropies in Neutron-, Deuteron-, and Alpha-Particle-Induced Fission
journal, February 1965


Uncertainty-driven nuclear data evaluation including thermal (n, α ) applied to 59 Ni
journal, November 2017


Subthreshold Fission Cross Section of 237 Np
journal, May 2008

  • Tovesson, F.; Hill, T. S.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 159, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE07-55

Srim-2003
journal, June 2004

  • Ziegler, James F.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Vol. 219-220
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2004.01.208

The Fission Cross Sections of 233 U, 235 U, 238 U and 239 Pu for Neutrons in the Energy Range 0.030 MeV to 3.0 MeV
journal, August 1957

  • Allen, W. D.; Ferguson, A. T. G.
  • Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A, Vol. 70, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1088/0370-1298/70/8/303

Unrecognized Sources of Uncertainties (USU) in Experimental Nuclear Data
journal, January 2020


Data Covariances from R-Matrix Analyses of Light Nuclei
journal, January 2015


Absolute Neutron Fission Cross Sections of 235 U, 238 U, and 239 Pu at 13.9 and 14.6 MeV
journal, November 1978


Fission Cross-Section Ratio Measurements of 239 Pu and 233 U to 235 U from 0.24 to 24 keV
journal, March 1970


Evaluation of the Neutron Data Standards
journal, February 2018


Directional fast neutron detection using a time projection chamber
journal, December 2010

  • Bowden, N. S.; Heffner, M.; Carosi, G.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 624, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2010.09.010

Neutron-Induced Fission of 233 U, 238 U, 232 Th, 239 Pu, 237 Np, nat Pb and 209 Bi Relative to 235 U in the Energy Range 1-200 MeV
journal, August 2002

  • Shcherbakov, Oleg; Donets, Andrei; Evdokimov, Alexander
  • Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 39, Issue sup2
  • DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2002.10875081

Determination of Resonance Parameters and their Covariances from Neutron Induced Reaction Cross Section Data
journal, December 2012


The Fission Cross Sections of Plutonium-239 and Plutonium-242 Relative to Uranium-235 from 0.1 to 10 MeV
journal, December 1978


Performance of a MICROMEGAS-based TPC in a high-energy neutron beam
journal, February 2018

  • Snyder, L.; Manning, B.; Bowden, N. S.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 881
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.10.028

Measurement of the 239Pu(n,f) cross section from thermal up to 30 keV neutron energy
journal, January 1980


Assaying of targets for nuclear measurements with a gridded ionization chamber
journal, June 1985

  • Budtz-Jørgensen, C.; Knitter, H. H.; Bortels, G.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 236, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(85)90972-6

The effect of fragment anisotropy on fission-chamber efficiency
journal, July 1974


Experimental and theoretical investigation of the backscattering of fission fragments
journal, November 1979


ENDF/B-VII.1 Neutron Cross Section Data Testing with Critical Assembly Benchmarks and Reactor Experiments
journal, December 2011


Measurement of the Fission Cross Sections of Uranium-233 and Plutonium-239 Relative to Uranium-235 from 1 keV to 30 MeV
journal, May 1978

  • Carlson, G. W.; Behrens, J. W.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 66, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE78-1

DeCE: the ENDF-6 data interface and nuclear data evaluation assist code
journal, July 2019


Subthreshold Fission Cross Section of 240 Pu and the Fission Cross Sections of 235 U and 239 Pu
journal, December 1984

  • Weston, L. W.; Todd, J. H.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 88, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE84-A18373

Methods for primary standardization of activity
journal, August 2007


High-Resolution Fission Cross-Section Measurements of 235 U and 239 Pu
journal, August 1992

  • Weston, L. W.; Todd, J. H.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 111, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE92-A15488

Neutron-Induced Fission Cross-Section Ratios for 239 Pu, 240 Pu, 242 Pu, and 244 Pu Relative to 235 U from 0.5 to 400 MeV
journal, June 1998

  • Staples, Parrish; Morley, Kevin
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 129, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE98-A1969

Measurement of the ratio of the239Pu and235U fission cross sections for 0.024-7.4-MeV neutrons
journal, October 1977

  • Fursov, B. I.; Kupriyanov, V. M.; Ivanov, V. I.
  • Soviet Atomic Energy, Vol. 43, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF01117993

Geant4—a simulation toolkit
journal, July 2003

  • Agostinelli, S.; Allison, J.; Amako, K.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 506, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

Measurements of the Neutron Fission and Absorption Cross Sections of 239 Pu Over the Energy Region 0.02 eV to 30 keV
journal, May 1970

  • Gwin, R.; Weston, L. W.; de Saussure, G.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 40, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE70-A19691

Neutron Fission Cross Sections of 239 Pu and 240 Pu Relative to 235 U
journal, July 1983

  • Weston, L. W.; Todd, J. H.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 84, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE83-A17793

On the impact of the fissile coating on the fission chamber signal
journal, July 2012

  • Jammes, C.; Filliatre, P.; Loiseau, P.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 681
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.03.032

Validating nuclear data uncertainties obtained from a statistical analysis of experimental data with the “Physical Uncertainty Bounds” method
journal, January 2020

  • Neudecker, Denise; White, Morgan Curtis; Vaughan, Diane Elizabeth
  • EPJ Nuclear Sciences & Technologies, Vol. 6
  • DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2020007