Designing a tokamak fusion reactor—How does plasma physics fit in?
Abstract
Our work attempts to bridge the gap between tokamak reactor design and plasma physics. The analysis demonstrates that the overall design of a tokamak fusion reactor is determined almost entirely by the constraints imposed by nuclear physics and fusion engineering. Virtually, no plasma physics is required to determine the main design parameters of a reactor: a, R0, B0, Ti, Te, p, n, τE, I. The one exception is the value of the toroidal current I, which depends upon a combination of engineering and plasma physics. This exception, however, ultimately has a major impact on the feasibility of an attractive tokamak reactor. The analysis shows that the engineering/nuclear physics design makes demands on the plasma physics that must be satisfied in order to generate power. These demands are substituted into the well-known operational constraints arising in tokamak physics: the Troyon limit, Greenwald limit, kink stability limit, and bootstrap fraction limit. However, a tokamak reactor designed on the basis of standard engineering and nuclear physics constraints does not scale to a reactor. Too much current is required to achieve the necessary confinement time for ignition. The combination of achievable bootstrap current plus current drive is not sufficient to generate the current demandedmore »
- Authors:
-
- Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC), Fusion Energy Sciences (FES)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1547016
- Alternate Identifier(s):
- OSTI ID: 1228333
- Grant/Contract Number:
- FG02-91ER54109; FC02-93ER54186
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Physics of Plasmas
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 22; Journal Issue: 7; Journal ID: ISSN 1070-664X
- Publisher:
- American Institute of Physics (AIP)
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; 73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS
Citation Formats
Freidberg, J. P., Mangiarotti, F. J., and Minervini, J. Designing a tokamak fusion reactor—How does plasma physics fit in?. United States: N. p., 2015.
Web. doi:10.1063/1.4923266.
Freidberg, J. P., Mangiarotti, F. J., & Minervini, J. Designing a tokamak fusion reactor—How does plasma physics fit in?. United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4923266
Freidberg, J. P., Mangiarotti, F. J., and Minervini, J. Wed .
"Designing a tokamak fusion reactor—How does plasma physics fit in?". United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4923266. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1547016.
@article{osti_1547016,
title = {Designing a tokamak fusion reactor—How does plasma physics fit in?},
author = {Freidberg, J. P. and Mangiarotti, F. J. and Minervini, J.},
abstractNote = {Our work attempts to bridge the gap between tokamak reactor design and plasma physics. The analysis demonstrates that the overall design of a tokamak fusion reactor is determined almost entirely by the constraints imposed by nuclear physics and fusion engineering. Virtually, no plasma physics is required to determine the main design parameters of a reactor: a, R0, B0, Ti, Te, p, n, τE, I. The one exception is the value of the toroidal current I, which depends upon a combination of engineering and plasma physics. This exception, however, ultimately has a major impact on the feasibility of an attractive tokamak reactor. The analysis shows that the engineering/nuclear physics design makes demands on the plasma physics that must be satisfied in order to generate power. These demands are substituted into the well-known operational constraints arising in tokamak physics: the Troyon limit, Greenwald limit, kink stability limit, and bootstrap fraction limit. However, a tokamak reactor designed on the basis of standard engineering and nuclear physics constraints does not scale to a reactor. Too much current is required to achieve the necessary confinement time for ignition. The combination of achievable bootstrap current plus current drive is not sufficient to generate the current demanded by the engineering design. Several possible solutions are discussed in detail involving advances in plasma physics or engineering. The main contribution of this report is to demonstrate that the basic reactor design and its plasma physics consequences can be determined simply and analytically. The analysis thus provides a crisp, compact, logical framework that will hopefully lead to improved physical intuition for connecting plasma physic to tokamak reactor design.},
doi = {10.1063/1.4923266},
journal = {Physics of Plasmas},
number = 7,
volume = 22,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015},
month = {Wed Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2015}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
On heat loading, novel divertors, and fusion reactors
journal, July 2007
- Kotschenreuther, M.; Valanju, P. M.; Mahajan, S. M.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 14, Issue 7
Geometrical properties of a “snowflake” divertor
journal, June 2007
- Ryutov, D. D.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 14, Issue 6
Review of blanket designs for advanced fusion reactors
journal, December 2008
- Ihli, T.; Basu, T. K.; Giancarli, L. M.
- Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 83, Issue 7-9
Overview of EU DEMO design and R&D activities
journal, October 2014
- Federici, G.; Kemp, R.; Ward, D.
- Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 89, Issue 7-8
The advanced SSTR
journal, September 2000
- Kikuchi, M.; Seki, Y.; Nakagawa, K.
- Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 48, Issue 3-4
On the Minimum Size of DEMO
journal, October 2010
- Zohm, Hartmut
- Fusion Science and Technology, Vol. 58, Issue 2
Scaling of tokamak reactor costs
journal, December 1980
- Spears, W. R.; Wesson, J. A.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 20, Issue 12
Comparison of radiating divertor behaviour in single-null and double-null plasmas in DIII-D
journal, March 2008
- Petrie, T. W.; Brooks, N. H.; Fenstermacher, M. E.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 48, Issue 4
Design and Specifications of the ITER TF Coils
journal, June 2008
- Sborchia, C.; Fu, Y.; Gallix, R.
- IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 18, Issue 2
Hybrid Fusion: The Only Viable Development Path for Tokamaks?
journal, July 2008
- Manheimer, Wallace
- Journal of Fusion Energy, Vol. 28, Issue 1
Steady state tokamak reactor based on the bootstrap current
journal, February 1990
- Kikuchi, M.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 30, Issue 2
Thermal control of the liquid lithium divertor for NSTX
journal, June 2009
- Nygren, Richard E.; Harjes, H. Charles; Wakeland, Peter
- Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 84, Issue 7-11
Physics and scaling of the H-mode pedestal
journal, May 2000
- Hubbard, A. E.
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 42, Issue 5A
Hydromagnetic stability of tokamaks
journal, January 1978
- Wesson, J. A.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 18, Issue 1
Power plant conceptual studies in Europe
journal, October 2007
- Maisonnier, D.; Campbell, D.; Cook, I.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 47, Issue 11
Aquaculture of Uranium in Seawater by a Fabric-Adsorbent Submerged System
journal, November 2003
- Seko, Noriaki; Katakai, Akio; Hasegawa, Shin
- Nuclear Technology, Vol. 144, Issue 2
Stellarator and tokamak plasmas: a comparison
journal, November 2012
- Helander, P.; Beidler, C. D.; Bird, T. M.
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 54, Issue 12
A new look at density limits in tokamaks
journal, December 1988
- Greenwald, M.; Terry, J. L.; Wolfe, S. M.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 28, Issue 12
Fusion–Fission Transmutation Scheme—Efficient destruction of nuclear waste
journal, January 2009
- Kotschenreuther, M.; Valanju, P. M.; Mahajan, S. M.
- Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 84, Issue 1
ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data
journal, December 2011
- Chadwick, M. B.; Herman, M.; Obložinský, P.
- Nuclear Data Sheets, Vol. 112, Issue 12
MHD-Limits to Plasma Confinement
journal, January 1984
- Troyon, F.; Gruber, R.; Saurenmann, H.
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 26, Issue 1A
Enhanced confinement in tokamaks
journal, December 1990
- Stambaugh, R. D.; Wolfe, S. M.; Hawryluk, R. J.
- Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, Vol. 2, Issue 12
ARC: A compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets
journal, November 2015
- Sorbom, B. N.; Ball, J.; Palmer, T. R.
- Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 100
Aspect ratio scaling of ideal no-wall stability limits in high bootstrap fraction tokamak plasmas
journal, February 2004
- Menard, J. E.; Bell, M. G.; Bell, R. E.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 11, Issue 2
Scaling of the tokamak near the scrape-off layer H-mode power width and implications for ITER
journal, August 2013
- Eich, T.; Leonard, A. W.; Pitts, R. A.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 53, Issue 9
Scaling of the power exhaust channel in Alcator C-Mod
journal, May 2011
- LaBombard, B.; Terry, J. L.; Hughes, J. W.
- Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 18, Issue 5
Physics of magnetically confined plasmas
journal, January 2005
- Boozer, Allen H.
- Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 76, Issue 4
An exploration of advanced X-divertor scenarios on ITER
journal, May 2014
- Covele, B.; Valanju, P.; Kotschenreuther, M.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 54, Issue 7
Biasing of closed double null poloidal divertor plates on TdeV
journal, March 1992
- Couture, P.; Boileau, A.; Décoste, R.
- Physics Letters A, Vol. 163, Issue 3
A review of internal transport barrier physics for steady-state operation of tokamaks
journal, March 2004
- Connor, J. W.; Fukuda, T.; Garbet, X.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 44, Issue 4
Fusion Breeding for Mid-Century Sustainable Power
journal, March 2014
- Manheimer, Wallace
- Journal of Fusion Energy, Vol. 33, Issue 3
Parametric instabilities due to lower-hybrid radio frequency heating of tokamak plasmas
journal, January 1977
- Porkolab, Miklos
- Physics of Fluids, Vol. 20, Issue 12
Breeding blanket concepts for fusion and materials requirements
journal, December 2002
- Raffray, A. R.; Akiba, M.; Chuyanov, V.
- Journal of Nuclear Materials, Vol. 307-311
DEMO and fusion power plant conceptual studies in Europe
journal, February 2006
- Maisonnier, David; Cook, Iau; Pierre, Sardain
- Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 81, Issue 8-14
Magnetohydrodynamic equilibria of attached plasmas after loss of vertical stability in elongated tokamaks
journal, October 1991
- Lao, L. L.; Jensen, T. H.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 31, Issue 10
The Aries-I Tokamak Reactor Study
book, January 1991
- Najmabadi, F.; Conn, R. W.; Bathke, C. G.
- Fusion Technology 1990
Implementation and first application of EMC3-EIRENE to EAST double-null divertor
journal, June 2014
- Huang, J.; Feng, Y.; Wan, B.
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 56, Issue 7
The ARIES-AT advanced tokamak, Advanced technology fusion power plant
journal, January 2006
- Najmabadi, Farrokh; Abdou, A.; Bromberg, L.
- Fusion Engineering and Design, Vol. 80, Issue 1-4
ARC: A compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets
text, January 2014
- Sorbom, B. N.; Ball, J.; Palmer, T. R.
- arXiv