DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Disconnected covariance of 2-point functions in large-scale structure

Abstract

Optimal analyses using the 2-point functions of large-scale structure probes require accurate covariance matrices. A covariance matrix of the 2-point function comprises the disconnected part and the connected part. While the connected covariance only becomes important on small scales, the disconnected covariance is dominant on large scales, where the survey window has a significant impact. In this work, we develop an analytical method to compute the disconnected covariance, accounting for the window effect. Derived under the flat-sky approximation, our formalism is applicable to wide surveys by swapping in the curved-sky window functions. Our method works for both the power spectrum and the correlation function, and applies to the covariances of various probes including the multipoles and the wedges of 3D clustering, the angular and the projected statistics of clustering and shear, as well as the cross covariances between different probes. We verify the analytic covariance against the sample covariance from the galaxy mock simulations in two test cases: (1) the power spectrum multipole covariance, and (2) the joint covariance of the projected correlation function and the correlation function multipoles. Our method achieve good agreement with the mocks, while at a negligible computational cost. Unlike mocks, our analytic covariance is freemore » of sampling noise, which often leads to numerical problems and the need to inflate the errors. In addition, our method can use the best-fit power spectrum as input, in contrast to the standard procedure of using a fiducial model that may deviate significantly from the truth. We also show that a naive diagonal power spectrum covariance underestimates the signal-to-noise ratio compared to our analytic covariance. The code that accompanies this paper is available at https://github.com/eelregit/covdisc.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [2]
  1. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Univ. of Tokyo (Japan)
  2. Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC); Univ. of California, Oakland, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1543938
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 2019; Journal Issue: 01; Journal ID: ISSN 1475-7516
Publisher:
Institute of Physics (IOP)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; Astronomy & Astrophysics; Physics

Citation Formats

Li, Yin, Singh, Sukhdeep, Yu, Byeonghee, Feng, Yu, and Seljak, Uroš. Disconnected covariance of 2-point functions in large-scale structure. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/016.
Li, Yin, Singh, Sukhdeep, Yu, Byeonghee, Feng, Yu, & Seljak, Uroš. Disconnected covariance of 2-point functions in large-scale structure. United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/016
Li, Yin, Singh, Sukhdeep, Yu, Byeonghee, Feng, Yu, and Seljak, Uroš. Fri . "Disconnected covariance of 2-point functions in large-scale structure". United States. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/016. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1543938.
@article{osti_1543938,
title = {Disconnected covariance of 2-point functions in large-scale structure},
author = {Li, Yin and Singh, Sukhdeep and Yu, Byeonghee and Feng, Yu and Seljak, Uroš},
abstractNote = {Optimal analyses using the 2-point functions of large-scale structure probes require accurate covariance matrices. A covariance matrix of the 2-point function comprises the disconnected part and the connected part. While the connected covariance only becomes important on small scales, the disconnected covariance is dominant on large scales, where the survey window has a significant impact. In this work, we develop an analytical method to compute the disconnected covariance, accounting for the window effect. Derived under the flat-sky approximation, our formalism is applicable to wide surveys by swapping in the curved-sky window functions. Our method works for both the power spectrum and the correlation function, and applies to the covariances of various probes including the multipoles and the wedges of 3D clustering, the angular and the projected statistics of clustering and shear, as well as the cross covariances between different probes. We verify the analytic covariance against the sample covariance from the galaxy mock simulations in two test cases: (1) the power spectrum multipole covariance, and (2) the joint covariance of the projected correlation function and the correlation function multipoles. Our method achieve good agreement with the mocks, while at a negligible computational cost. Unlike mocks, our analytic covariance is free of sampling noise, which often leads to numerical problems and the need to inflate the errors. In addition, our method can use the best-fit power spectrum as input, in contrast to the standard procedure of using a fiducial model that may deviate significantly from the truth. We also show that a naive diagonal power spectrum covariance underestimates the signal-to-noise ratio compared to our analytic covariance. The code that accompanies this paper is available at https://github.com/eelregit/covdisc.},
doi = {10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/016},
journal = {Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics},
number = 01,
volume = 2019,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Jan 04 00:00:00 EST 2019},
month = {Fri Jan 04 00:00:00 EST 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 34 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Computing the three-point correlation function of galaxies in $\mathcal {O}(N^2)$ time
journal, October 2015

  • Slepian, Zachary; Eisenstein, Daniel J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 454, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2119

Extending the modeling of the anisotropic galaxy power spectrum to k = 0.4 h Mpc −1
journal, October 2017

  • Hand, Nick; Seljak, Uroš; Beutler, Florian
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/10/009

Parameter inference with estimated covariance matrices
journal, December 2015

  • Sellentin, Elena; Heavens, Alan F.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Vol. 456, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv190

Weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies
journal, March 1992

  • Kaiser, Nick
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 388
  • DOI: 10.1086/171151

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Releases 10 and 11 Galaxy samples
journal, April 2014

  • Anderson, Lauren; Aubourg, Éric; Bailey, Stephen
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 441, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu523

A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant
journal, July 2016

  • Riess, Adam G.; Macri, Lucas M.; Hoffmann, Samantha L.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 826, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/56

Non-Gaussian error bars in galaxy surveys - I
journal, May 2012


Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear
journal, August 2018


nbodykit: An Open-source, Massively Parallel Toolkit for Large-scale Structure
journal, September 2018


The 6dF Galaxy Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations and the local Hubble constant: 6dFGS: BAOs and the local Hubble constant
journal, July 2011


Efficient evaluation of angular power spectra and bispectra
journal, November 2017

  • Assassi, Valentin; Simonović, Marko; Zaldarriaga, Matias
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/11/054

Response approach to the matter power spectrum covariance
journal, November 2017


Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
journal, September 2013

  • Amendola, Luca; Appleby, Stephen; Bacon, David
  • Living Reviews in Relativity, Vol. 16, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.12942/lrr-2013-6

Uncorrelated modes of the non-linear power spectrum
journal, February 2000


Numerical Fourier and Bessel transforms in logarithmic variables
journal, October 1978


Power spectrum super-sample covariance
journal, June 2013


Galaxy–galaxy lensing estimators and their covariance properties
journal, July 2017

  • Singh, Sukhdeep; Mandelbaum, Rachel; Seljak, Uroš
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 471, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1828

Power Spectrum Covariance of Weak Gravitational Lensing
journal, June 2001

  • Cooray, Asantha; Hu, Wayne
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 554, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/321376

The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample
journal, March 2017

  • Alam, Shadab; Ata, Metin; Bailey, Stephen
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 470, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx721

Complete super-sample lensing covariance in the response approach
journal, June 2018

  • Barreira, Alexandre; Krause, Elisabeth; Schmidt, Fabian
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 06
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/06/015

Shrinkage estimation of the power spectrum covariance matrix
journal, September 2008


Power-spectrum analysis of three-dimensional redshift surveys
journal, May 1994

  • Feldman, Hume A.; Kaiser, Nick; Peacock, John A.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 426
  • DOI: 10.1086/174036

Planck 2015 results : XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
journal, September 2016


A Measurement of the Quadrupole Power Spectrum in the Clustering of the 2dF QSO Survey
journal, February 2006

  • Yamamoto, Kazuhiro; Nakamichi, Masashi; Kamino, Akinari
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, Vol. 58, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/pasj/58.1.93

Sample Variance Considerations for Cluster Surveys
journal, February 2003

  • Hu, Wayne; Kravtsov, Andrey V.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 584, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1086/345846

The impact of non-Gaussian errors on weak lensing surveys
journal, June 2009


H0LiCOW – V. New COSMOGRAIL time delays of HE 0435−1223: H 0 to 3.8 per cent precision from strong lensing in a flat ΛCDM model
journal, November 2016

  • Bonvin, V.; Courbin, F.; Suyu, S. H.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 465, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3006

Power Spectrum Correlations Induced by Nonlinear Clustering
journal, December 1999

  • Scoccimarro, Roman; Zaldarriaga, Matias; Hui, Lam
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 527, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1086/308059

Large covariance matrices: smooth models from the two-point correlation function
journal, July 2016

  • O'Connell, Ross; Eisenstein, Daniel; Vargas, Mariana
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 462, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1821

Covariance of the galaxy angular power spectrum with the halo model
journal, July 2018


Accelerating the two-point and three-point galaxy correlation functions using Fourier transforms
journal, October 2015

  • Slepian, Zachary; Eisenstein, Daniel J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Vol. 455, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv133

Robustness of the covariance matrix for galaxy clustering measurements
journal, August 2018

  • Baumgarten, Falk; Chuang, Chia-Hsun
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 480, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1971

Fast estimators for redshift-space clustering
journal, October 2015


Non-Gaussian covariance of the matter power spectrum in the effective field theory of large scale structure
journal, June 2016


KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering
journal, October 2017

  • Joudaki, Shahab; Blake, Chris; Johnson, Andrew
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 474, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2820

Large-scale tidal effect on redshift-space power spectrum in a finite-volume survey
journal, April 2017


Power spectrum multipoles on the curved sky: an application to the 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey
journal, July 2018

  • Blake, Chris; Carter, Paul; Koda, Jun
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 479, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty1814

Measuring line-of-sight-dependent Fourier-space clustering using FFTs
journal, August 2015

  • Bianchi, Davide; Gil-Marín, Héctor; Ruggeri, Rossana
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Vol. 453, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv090

Power spectrum and correlation function errors: Poisson vs. Gaussian shot noise
journal, January 2006


An optimal FFT-based anisotropic power spectrum estimator
journal, July 2017


The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9: WiggleZ Survey: growth of structure
journal, June 2011


Fast and accurate computation of projected two-point functions
journal, January 2018


Galaxy two-point covariance matrix estimation for next generation surveys
journal, September 2017

  • Howlett, Cullan; Percival, Will J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 472, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2342

The effect of covariance estimator error on cosmological parameter constraints
journal, September 2013


Perturbative approach to covariance matrix of the matter power spectrum
journal, December 2016

  • Mohammed, Irshad; Seljak, Uroš; Vlah, Zvonimir
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 466, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3196

Super-sample signal
journal, November 2014


Covariance of cross-correlations: towards efficient measures for large-scale structure
journal, December 2009


Limits on statistical anisotropy from BOSS DR12 galaxies using bipolar spherical harmonics
journal, September 2017

  • Sugiyama, Naonori S.; Shiraishi, Maresuke; Okumura, Teppei
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 473, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2333

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: mock galaxy catalogues for the BOSS Final Data Release
journal, January 2016

  • Kitaura, Francisco-Shu; Rodríguez-Torres, Sergio; Chuang, Chia-Hsun
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 456, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2826

CFHTLenS: testing the laws of gravity with tomographic weak lensing and redshift-space distortions
journal, December 2012

  • Simpson, Fergus; Heymans, Catherine; Parkinson, David
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 429, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts493

On measuring the covariance matrix of the non-linear power spectrum from simulations
journal, September 2006

  • Hamilton, Andrew J. S.; Rimes, Christopher D.; Scoccimarro, Rom��n
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 371, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10709.x

Statistical analysis of galaxy surveys - I. Robust error estimation for two-point clustering statistics
journal, June 2009


Super-sample covariance in simulations
journal, April 2014


Measuring Cosmological Parameters with Galaxy Surveys
journal, November 1997


The growth of correlations in the matter power spectrum
journal, October 1999


SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12: galaxy target selection and large-scale structure catalogues
journal, November 2015

  • Reid, Beth; Ho, Shirley; Padmanabhan, Nikhil
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 455, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2382

Bias and variance of angular correlation functions
journal, July 1993

  • Landy, Stephen D.; Szalay, Alexander S.
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 412
  • DOI: 10.1086/172900

Rapid modelling of the redshift-space power spectrum multipoles for a masked density field
journal, October 2016

  • Wilson, M. J.; Peacock, J. A.; Taylor, A. N.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 464, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2576

Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix
journal, December 2006


Galaxy power-spectrum responses and redshift-space super-sample effect
journal, February 2018

  • Li, Yin; Schmittfull, Marcel; Seljak, Uroš
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 02
  • DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/02/022

The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Fourier space
journal, September 2016

  • Beutler, Florian; Seo, Hee-Jong; Ross, Ashley J.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 464, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2373

Gaussian covariance matrices for anisotropic galaxy clustering measurements
journal, February 2016

  • Grieb, Jan Niklas; Sánchez, Ariel G.; Salazar-Albornoz, Salvador
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 457, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw065

The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field.
journal, January 1953

  • Limber, D. Nelson
  • The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 117
  • DOI: 10.1086/145672

Putting the precision in precision cosmology: How accurate should your data covariance matrix be?
journal, May 2013

  • Taylor, A.; Joachimi, B.; Kitching, T.
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 432, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt270

Estimating the power spectrum covariance matrix with fewer mock samples
journal, January 2016

  • Pearson, David W.; Samushia, Lado
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 457, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw062

An optimal FFT-based anisotropic power spectrum estimator
journal, July 2017


SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12: galaxy target selection and large-scale structure catalogues
journal, November 2015

  • Reid, Beth; Ho, Shirley; Padmanabhan, Nikhil
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 455, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2382

Extended Limber approximation
journal, December 2008


Fast Estimators for Redshift-Space Clustering
text, January 2015


Gaussian covariance matrices for anisotropic galaxy clustering measurements
text, January 2015