DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Using Bayesian Networks for Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Biogeochemical Models

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis is a vital tool in numerical modeling to identify important parameters and processes that contribute to the overall uncertainty in model outputs. We developed here a new sensitivity analysis method to quantify the relative importance of uncertain model processes that contain multiple uncertain parameters. The method is based on the concepts of Bayesian networks (BNs) to account for complex hierarchical uncertainty structure of a model system. We derived a new set of sensitivity indices using the methodology of variance-based global sensitivity analysis with the Bayesian inference. The framework is capable of representing the detailed uncertainty information of a complex model system using BNs and affords flexible grouping of different uncertain inputs given their characteristics and dependency structures. We have implemented the method on a real-world biogeochemical model at the groundwater-surface water interface within the Hanford Site's 300 Area. The uncertainty sources of the model were first grouped into forcing scenario and three different processes based on our understanding of the complex system. The sensitivity analysis results indicate that both the reactive transport and groundwater flow processes are important sources of uncertainty for carbon-consumption predictions. Within the groundwater flow process, the structure of geological formations is more important thanmore » the permeability heterogeneity within a given geological formation. Our new sensitivity analysis framework based on BNs offers substantial flexibility for investigating the importance of combinations of interacting uncertainty sources in a hierarchical order, and it is expected to be applicable to a wide range of multi-physics models for complex systems.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [2]
  1. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Jinan Univ., Guangzhou (China). Inst. of Groundwater and Earth Sciences
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  3. Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL (United States)
  4. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
  5. Jinan Univ., Guangzhou (China)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC); Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL (United States); Jinan Univ., Guangzhou (China)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); PNNL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program; National Science Foundation (NSF); National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
OSTI Identifier:
1542940
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1502972; OSTI ID: 1506160
Report Number(s):
SAND-2019-2924J
Journal ID: ISSN 0043-1397
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0008272; SC0019438; AC05‐76RL01830; AC02‐05CH11231; NA0003525; AC05-76RL01830; AC02-05CH11231; 1552329; 41807182; SBR PNNL SFA
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Water Resources Research
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 55; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 0043-1397
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
58 GEOSCIENCES; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Bayesian network; hierarchical sensitivity analysis; biogeochemical modeling; reactive transport

Citation Formats

Dai, Heng, Chen, Xingyuan, Ye, Ming, Song, Xuehang, Hammond, Glenn, Hu, Bill, and Zachara, John M. Using Bayesian Networks for Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Biogeochemical Models. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1029/2018WR023589.
Dai, Heng, Chen, Xingyuan, Ye, Ming, Song, Xuehang, Hammond, Glenn, Hu, Bill, & Zachara, John M. Using Bayesian Networks for Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Biogeochemical Models. United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023589
Dai, Heng, Chen, Xingyuan, Ye, Ming, Song, Xuehang, Hammond, Glenn, Hu, Bill, and Zachara, John M. Fri . "Using Bayesian Networks for Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Biogeochemical Models". United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023589. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1542940.
@article{osti_1542940,
title = {Using Bayesian Networks for Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Biogeochemical Models},
author = {Dai, Heng and Chen, Xingyuan and Ye, Ming and Song, Xuehang and Hammond, Glenn and Hu, Bill and Zachara, John M.},
abstractNote = {Sensitivity analysis is a vital tool in numerical modeling to identify important parameters and processes that contribute to the overall uncertainty in model outputs. We developed here a new sensitivity analysis method to quantify the relative importance of uncertain model processes that contain multiple uncertain parameters. The method is based on the concepts of Bayesian networks (BNs) to account for complex hierarchical uncertainty structure of a model system. We derived a new set of sensitivity indices using the methodology of variance-based global sensitivity analysis with the Bayesian inference. The framework is capable of representing the detailed uncertainty information of a complex model system using BNs and affords flexible grouping of different uncertain inputs given their characteristics and dependency structures. We have implemented the method on a real-world biogeochemical model at the groundwater-surface water interface within the Hanford Site's 300 Area. The uncertainty sources of the model were first grouped into forcing scenario and three different processes based on our understanding of the complex system. The sensitivity analysis results indicate that both the reactive transport and groundwater flow processes are important sources of uncertainty for carbon-consumption predictions. Within the groundwater flow process, the structure of geological formations is more important than the permeability heterogeneity within a given geological formation. Our new sensitivity analysis framework based on BNs offers substantial flexibility for investigating the importance of combinations of interacting uncertainty sources in a hierarchical order, and it is expected to be applicable to a wide range of multi-physics models for complex systems.},
doi = {10.1029/2018WR023589},
journal = {Water Resources Research},
number = 4,
volume = 55,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2019},
month = {Fri Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 19 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of spatial variability models in unsaturated fractured tuff: MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD BAYESIAN MODEL AVERAGING
journal, May 2004

  • Ye, Ming; Neuman, Shlomo P.; Meyer, Philip D.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 40, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2003WR002557

A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output
journal, February 1999

  • Saltelli, A.; Tarantola, S.; Chan, K. P. -S.
  • Technometrics, Vol. 41, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2307/1270993

Exploiting causal functional relationships in Bayesian network modelling for personalised healthcare
journal, January 2014

  • Velikova, Marina; van Scheltinga, Josien Terwisscha; Lucas, Peter J. F.
  • International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 55, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.03.016

Dominant processes concept, model simplification and classification framework in catchment hydrology
journal, August 2007


Regulation-Structured Dynamic Metabolic Model Provides a Potential Mechanism for Delayed Enzyme Response in Denitrification Process
journal, September 2017


Groundwater quality assessment using data clustering based on hybrid Bayesian networks
journal, December 2012

  • Aguilera, Pedro A.; Fernández, Antonio; Ropero, Rosa F.
  • Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 27, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00477-012-0676-8

Evaluating the performance of parallel subsurface simulators: An illustrative example with PFLOTRAN: Evaluating the Parallel Performance of Pflotran
journal, January 2014

  • Hammond, G. E.; Lichtner, P. C.; Mills, R. T.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 50, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2012WR013483

About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output
journal, January 1995


Presenting Results from Model Based Studies to Decision-Makers: Can Sensitivity Analysis Be a Defogging Agent?
journal, December 1998


Exploring vulnerability of coastal habitats to sea level rise through global sensitivity and uncertainty analyses
journal, May 2011


Maximum likelihood Bayesian averaging of uncertain model predictions
journal, November 2003

  • Neuman, S. P.
  • Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA), Vol. 17, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00477-003-0151-7

Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process-based hydrologic models: NARROWING THE GAP BETWEEN HYDROLOGIC THEORY AND MODELS
journal, March 2016

  • Clark, Martyn P.; Schaefli, Bettina; Schymanski, Stanislaus J.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 52, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015WR017910

Drought Conditions Maximize the Impact of High‐Frequency Flow Variations on Thermal Regimes and Biogeochemical Function in the Hyporheic Zone
journal, October 2018

  • Song, Xuehang; Chen, Xingyuan; Stegen, James
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 54, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018WR022586

Establishing a geochemical heterogeneity model for a contaminated vadose zone — Aquifer system
journal, October 2013


Assessment and management of risk in subsurface hydrology: A review and perspective
journal, January 2013


Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling
journal, February 2012


A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models
journal, June 2006


A unified approach for process‐based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies
journal, April 2015

  • Clark, Martyn P.; Nijssen, Bart; Lundquist, Jessica D.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015WR017200

Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications
journal, April 2015


Making sense of global sensitivity analyses
journal, April 2014


Dominant processes concept in hydrology: moving forward
journal, August 2004

  • Sivakumar, Bellie
  • Hydrological Processes, Vol. 18, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5606

Hierarchical sensitivity analysis for simulating barrier island geomorphologic responses to future storms and sea-level rise
journal, November 2018


Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index
journal, February 2010

  • Saltelli, Andrea; Annoni, Paola; Azzini, Ivano
  • Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 181, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018

Internal Domains of Natural Porous Media Revealed: Critical Locations for Transport, Storage, and Chemical Reaction
journal, February 2016

  • Zachara, John; Brantley, Sue; Chorover, Jon
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05015

Three-dimensional Bayesian geostatistical aquifer characterization at the Hanford 300 Area using tracer test data: INVERSION OF TRACER DATA USING MAD
journal, June 2012

  • Chen, Xingyuan; Murakami, Haruko; Hahn, Melanie S.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 48, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011WR010675

Groundwater–surface water mixing shifts ecological assembly processes and stimulates organic carbon turnover
journal, April 2016

  • Stegen, James C.; Fredrickson, James K.; Wilkins, Michael J.
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11237

Bayesian networks in environmental modelling
journal, December 2011


Carbon Inputs From Riparian Vegetation Limit Oxidation of Physically Bound Organic Carbon Via Biochemical and Thermodynamic Processes: OC Oxidation Processes Across Vegetation
journal, December 2017

  • Graham, Emily B.; Tfaily, Malak M.; Crump, Alex R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 122, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JG003967

A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output
journal, February 1999


A physically based analytical model of flood frequency curves: PHYSICALLY BASED FLOOD FREQUENCY CURVES
journal, September 2016

  • Basso, S.; Schirmer, M.; Botter, G.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL069915

Bayesian approach for three-dimensional aquifer characterization at the Hanford 300 Area
journal, January 2010


Expert elicitation of recharge model probabilities for the Death Valley regional flow system
journal, June 2008


Functional Enzyme-Based Approach for Linking Microbial Community Functions with Biogeochemical Process Kinetics
journal, September 2017

  • Li, Minjing; Qian, Wei-jun; Gao, Yuqian
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03158

Influences of organic carbon speciation on hyporheic corridor biogeochemistry and microbial ecology
journal, February 2018


Time-varying sensitivity analysis clarifies the effects of watershed model formulation on model behavior: TIME-VARYING SENSITIVITY OF WATERSHED MODELS
journal, March 2013

  • Herman, J. D.; Reed, P. M.; Wagener, T.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 49, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/wrcr.20124

Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process-based hydrologic models
text, January 2016

  • Clark, Martyn P.; Schaefli, Bettina; Schymanski, Stanislaus J.
  • American Geophysical Union
  • DOI: 10.48350/151310