DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Accounting for Debye sheath expansion for proud Langmuir probes in magnetic confinement fusion plasmas

Abstract

A Child-Langmuir law-based method for accounting for Debye sheath expansion while fitting the current-voltage I-V characteristic of proud Langmuir probes (electrodes that extend into the volume of the plasma) is described. For Langmuir probes of a typical size used in tokamak plasmas, these new estimates of electron temperature and ion saturation current density values decreased by up to 60% compared to methods that did not account for sheath expansion. Changes to the collection area are modeled using the Child-Langmuir law and effective expansion perimeter lp, and the model is thus referred to as the “perimeter sheath expansion method.” lp is determined solely from electrode geometry, so the method may be employed without prior measurement of the magnitude of the sheath expansion effects for a given Langmuir probe and can be used for electrodes of different geometries. This method correctly predicts the non-saturating ΔI/ΔV slope for cold, low-density plasmas where sheath-expansion effects are strong, as well as for hot plasmas where ΔI/ΔV ~ 0, though it is shown that the sheath can still significantly affect the collection area in these hot conditions. The perimeter sheath expansion method has several advantages compared to methods where the non-saturating current is fitted: (1) Itmore » is more resilient to scatter in the I-V characteristics observed in turbulent plasmas. (2) It is able to separate the contributions to the ΔI/ΔV slope from sheath expansion to that of the high energy electron tail in high Te conditions. (3) It calculates the change in the collection area due to the Debye sheath for conditions where ΔI/ΔV ~ 0 and for V = Vf.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Univ. of California, San Diego, CA (United States); Swiss Federal Inst. of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL) (Switzerland). Swiss Plasma Center (SPC)
  2. Univ. of California, San Diego, CA (United States)
  3. Univ. of Toronto, ON (Canada). Inst. for Aerospace Studies
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of California, San Diego, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Fusion Energy Sciences (FES)
OSTI Identifier:
1526018
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1417232
Grant/Contract Number:  
SC0010529
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Review of Scientific Instruments
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 89; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 0034-6748
Publisher:
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; 46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Citation Formats

Tsui, C. K., Boedo, J. A., and Stangeby, P. C. Accounting for Debye sheath expansion for proud Langmuir probes in magnetic confinement fusion plasmas. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1063/1.4995353.
Tsui, C. K., Boedo, J. A., & Stangeby, P. C. Accounting for Debye sheath expansion for proud Langmuir probes in magnetic confinement fusion plasmas. United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995353
Tsui, C. K., Boedo, J. A., and Stangeby, P. C. Wed . "Accounting for Debye sheath expansion for proud Langmuir probes in magnetic confinement fusion plasmas". United States. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995353. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1526018.
@article{osti_1526018,
title = {Accounting for Debye sheath expansion for proud Langmuir probes in magnetic confinement fusion plasmas},
author = {Tsui, C. K. and Boedo, J. A. and Stangeby, P. C.},
abstractNote = {A Child-Langmuir law-based method for accounting for Debye sheath expansion while fitting the current-voltage I-V characteristic of proud Langmuir probes (electrodes that extend into the volume of the plasma) is described. For Langmuir probes of a typical size used in tokamak plasmas, these new estimates of electron temperature and ion saturation current density values decreased by up to 60% compared to methods that did not account for sheath expansion. Changes to the collection area are modeled using the Child-Langmuir law and effective expansion perimeter lp, and the model is thus referred to as the “perimeter sheath expansion method.” lp is determined solely from electrode geometry, so the method may be employed without prior measurement of the magnitude of the sheath expansion effects for a given Langmuir probe and can be used for electrodes of different geometries. This method correctly predicts the non-saturating ΔI/ΔV slope for cold, low-density plasmas where sheath-expansion effects are strong, as well as for hot plasmas where ΔI/ΔV ~ 0, though it is shown that the sheath can still significantly affect the collection area in these hot conditions. The perimeter sheath expansion method has several advantages compared to methods where the non-saturating current is fitted: (1) It is more resilient to scatter in the I-V characteristics observed in turbulent plasmas. (2) It is able to separate the contributions to the ΔI/ΔV slope from sheath expansion to that of the high energy electron tail in high Te conditions. (3) It calculates the change in the collection area due to the Debye sheath for conditions where ΔI/ΔV ~ 0 and for V = Vf.},
doi = {10.1063/1.4995353},
journal = {Review of Scientific Instruments},
number = 1,
volume = 89,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jan 17 00:00:00 EST 2018},
month = {Wed Jan 17 00:00:00 EST 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 17 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

FIG.  1 FIG. 1: A poloidal cross section of the TCV tokamak (left) showing the magnetic geometry and the location of the reciprocating probe. The insets (right) show the reciprocating probe head geometry. The graphite electrodes extend out of a boron nitride insulator (in white) which is held in place and protectedmore » by a graphite shroud. The Mach probe array is shaded red, and the double probe array is shaded teal.« less

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Automatic fast fitting of single Langmuir probe characteristics on RFX
journal, January 1997

  • Bagatin, M.; Desideri, D.; Martines, E.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 68, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1147831

Recent sheath physics studies on DIII-D
journal, August 2015


Fast reciprocating Langmuir probe for the DIII-D divertor
journal, January 1997

  • Watkins, J. G.; Hunter, J.; Tafoya, B.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 68, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1147833

Four parameter data fit for Langmuir probes with nonsaturation of ion current
journal, June 1998

  • Desideri, D.; Serianni, G.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 69, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1148942

Errors in measuring electron temperatures using a single Langmuir probe in a magnetic field
journal, March 1987

  • Tagle, J. A.; Stangeby, P. C.; Erents, S. K.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 29, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/29/3/001

The Theory of Collectors in Gaseous Discharges
journal, October 1926


Sheath expansion at a corner
journal, October 1996


Practical solutions for reliable triple probe measurements in magnetized plasmas
journal, January 2011

  • Theiler, C.; Furno, I.; Kuenlin, A.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 82, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.3516045

Turbulent transport studies in the JET edge plasmas in limiter configuration
journal, March 2000

  • García-Cortés, I.; Balbín, R.; Loarte, A.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 42, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/42/4/302

Plasma–wall transition in an oblique magnetic field
journal, January 1982


Exact Solution of the Collisionless Plasma-Sheath Equation
journal, January 1963


DITE Langmuir probe results showing probe‐size and limiter‐shadow effects
journal, April 1984

  • Stangeby, P. C.; McCracken, G. M.; Erents, S. K.
  • Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films, Vol. 2, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1116/1.572551

Flush mounted Langmuir probes in an oblique magnetic field
journal, June 1997

  • Weinlich, M.; Carlson, A.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 4, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.872379

Flush-mounted Probes in the TdeV Tokamak: Theory and Experiment
journal, January 1996

  • Gunn, J. P.; Boucher, C.; Stansfield, B. L.
  • Contributions to Plasma Physics, Vol. 36, Issue S1
  • DOI: 10.1002/ctpp.19960360108

Intermittent transport in the plasma periphery of the T-10 tokamak
journal, March 2004

  • Kirnev, G. S.; Budaev, V. P.; Grashin, S. A.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 46, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/46/4/004

Der Niedervoltbogen
journal, September 1930

  • Druyvesteyn, M. J.
  • Zeitschrift für Physik, Vol. 64, Issue 11-12
  • DOI: 10.1007/bf01773007

Shielded Langmuir Ion Collection Probes
journal, November 1964

  • Janes, G. S.; Dotson, J. P.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 35, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1719237

Fast scanning probe for tokamak plasmas
journal, July 1998

  • Boedo, J.; Gray, D.; Chousal, L.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 69, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1148995

Study of ion sheath expansion and anisotropy of the electron parallel energy distribution in the CASTOR tokamak
journal, October 2007


Flush‐mounted probes in the divertor plates of Tokamak de Varennes
journal, January 1995

  • Gunn, James P.; Boucher, Claude; Stansfield, Barry L.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 66, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1145249

How big is a small Langmuir probe?
journal, July 2000


Edge effect correction for small planar Langmuir probes
journal, October 1990

  • Johnson, J. D.; Holmes, A. J. T.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 61, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.1141849

Edge fluctuation studies in Heliotron J
journal, March 2005


The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices
book, January 2000


Measurements of ion energies in the tokamak plasma boundary
journal, August 2011


Ion collection by planar Langmuir probes: Sheridan’s model and its verification
journal, March 2007

  • Lee, Dongsoo; Hershkowitz, Noah
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 14, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.2715557

An experimental study of ion currents to a flush mounted Langmuir probe in an ECR discharge
journal, January 1999


The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices
journal, January 2001


Works referencing / citing this record:

The flush-mounted rail Langmuir probe array designed for the Alcator C-Mod vertical target plate divertor
journal, April 2018

  • Kuang, A. Q.; Brunner, D.; LaBombard, B.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 89, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5023905

Analysis of wall-embedded Langmuir probe signals in different conditions on the Tokamak à Configuration Variable
journal, May 2018

  • Février, O.; Theiler, C.; De Oliveira, H.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 89, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5022459

Shaping effects on scrape-off layer plasma turbulence: A rigorous validation of three-dimensional simulations against TCV measurements
journal, January 2020

  • Riva, F.; Tsui, C. K.; Boedo, J. A.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 27, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5123451

Langmuir probe electronics upgrade on the tokamak à configuration variable
journal, August 2019

  • De Oliveira, H.; Marmillod, P.; Theiler, C.
  • Review of Scientific Instruments, Vol. 90, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5108876

3D particle-in-cell modeling of Langmuir probe effective collecting area in magnetized plasma
journal, June 2018

  • Podolník, A.; Komm, M.; Adámek, J.
  • Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Vol. 60, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/aac701

The effect of the secondary x-point on the scrape-off layer transport in the TCV snowflake minus divertor
journal, December 2018


Filamentary velocity scaling validation in the TCV tokamak
journal, July 2018

  • Tsui, C. K.; Boedo, J. A.; Myra, J. R.
  • Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 25, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.5038019