DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comments on “Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis”

Abstract

Capacitive deionization (CDI) is an emerging brackish water desalination technology in which ions are removed from water by electrostatically adsorbing them onto porous electrodes. Recently, Qin et al. presented an estimate of energy consumption for CDI schemes, and compared the energy consumption of CDI to the energy consumption of a particular reverse osmosis operation scheme which they propose. Qin et al. estimate very high values of energy consumption in CDI for brackish water desalination (e.g. ~1 to 2 g/L salt solution), and these values and trends do not agree with published experiments for CDI or with experimentally validated models for CDI. The current comment identifies important scaling errors and incorrect values in their model resistance parameters, and then discusses unphysical trends predicted by their model. We do not attempt provide a comprehensive review of their model, operation, estimates, and figures, but rather concentrate on several key issues. We present our comments in two sections dealing with resistances and energy metrics, respectively.

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [1]
  1. Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1524301
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-770722
Journal ID: ISSN 0011-9164; 961269
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC52-07NA27344
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Desalination
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 461; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0011-9164
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY

Citation Formats

Ramachandran, Ashwin, Oyarzun, Diego I., Hawks, Steven A., Campbell, Patrick G., Stadermann, Michael, and Santiago, Juan G. Comments on “Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis”. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.010.
Ramachandran, Ashwin, Oyarzun, Diego I., Hawks, Steven A., Campbell, Patrick G., Stadermann, Michael, & Santiago, Juan G. Comments on “Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis”. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.010
Ramachandran, Ashwin, Oyarzun, Diego I., Hawks, Steven A., Campbell, Patrick G., Stadermann, Michael, and Santiago, Juan G. Tue . "Comments on “Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis”". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.010. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1524301.
@article{osti_1524301,
title = {Comments on “Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis”},
author = {Ramachandran, Ashwin and Oyarzun, Diego I. and Hawks, Steven A. and Campbell, Patrick G. and Stadermann, Michael and Santiago, Juan G.},
abstractNote = {Capacitive deionization (CDI) is an emerging brackish water desalination technology in which ions are removed from water by electrostatically adsorbing them onto porous electrodes. Recently, Qin et al. presented an estimate of energy consumption for CDI schemes, and compared the energy consumption of CDI to the energy consumption of a particular reverse osmosis operation scheme which they propose. Qin et al. estimate very high values of energy consumption in CDI for brackish water desalination (e.g. ~1 to 2 g/L salt solution), and these values and trends do not agree with published experiments for CDI or with experimentally validated models for CDI. The current comment identifies important scaling errors and incorrect values in their model resistance parameters, and then discusses unphysical trends predicted by their model. We do not attempt provide a comprehensive review of their model, operation, estimates, and figures, but rather concentrate on several key issues. We present our comments in two sections dealing with resistances and energy metrics, respectively.},
doi = {10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.010},
journal = {Desalination},
number = C,
volume = 461,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Apr 02 00:00:00 EDT 2019},
month = {Tue Apr 02 00:00:00 EDT 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 29 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Capacitive Deionization Technology™: An alternative desalination solution
journal, November 2005


Review on the science and technology of water desalination by capacitive deionization
journal, October 2013


Water desalination via capacitive deionization: what is it and what can we expect from it?
journal, January 2015

  • Suss, M. E.; Porada, S.; Sun, X.
  • Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 8, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1039/C5EE00519A

Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis
journal, April 2019


Thermodynamics of Ion Separation by Electrosorption
journal, August 2018

  • Hemmatifar, Ali; Ramachandran, Ashwin; Liu, Kang
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 52, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02959

Performance metrics for the objective assessment of capacitive deionization systems
journal, April 2019


Energy Recovery in Membrane Capacitive Deionization
journal, April 2013

  • Długołęcki, Piotr; van der Wal, Albert
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1021/es3053202

Frequency analysis and resonant operation for efficient capacitive deionization
journal, November 2018


Self similarities in desalination dynamics and performance using capacitive deionization
journal, September 2018


High water recovery and improved thermodynamic efficiency for capacitive deionization using variable flowrate operation
journal, May 2019


Quantifying the flow efficiency in constant-current capacitive deionization
journal, February 2018


Resistance identification and rational process design in Capacitive Deionization
journal, January 2016


Characterization of Resistances of a Capacitive Deionization System
journal, August 2015

  • Qu, Yatian; Baumann, Theodore F.; Santiago, Juan G.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02542

New testing procedures of a capacitive deionization reactor
journal, January 2013

  • García-Quismondo, Enrique; Gómez, Roberto; Vaquero, Fernando
  • Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1039/c3cp50514f

Faradaic Reactions in Water Desalination by Batch-Mode Capacitive Deionization
journal, May 2016


Side Reactions in Capacitive Deionization (CDI) Processes: The Role of Oxygen Reduction
journal, December 2016


Energy consumption analysis of constant voltage and constant current operations in capacitive deionization
journal, December 2016


Energy breakdown in capacitive deionization
journal, November 2016


Works referencing / citing this record:

Emerging investigator series: capacitive deionization for selective removal of nitrate and perchlorate: impacts of ion selectivity and operating constraints on treatment costs
journal, January 2020

  • Hand, Steven; Cusick, Roland D.
  • Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, Vol. 6, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9ew01105f