DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Response of Surface Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation to Stratospheric SO2 Injections

Abstract

Climate modification by stratospheric SO2 injections, to form sulfate aerosols, may alter the spectral and angular distributions of the solar ultraviolet and visible radiation that reach the Earth’s surface, with potential consequences to environmental photobiology and photochemistry. We used modeling results from the CESM1(WACCM) stratospheric aerosol geoengineering large ensemble (GLENS) project, following the RCP8.5 emission scenario, and one geoengineering experiment with SO2 injections in the stratosphere, designed to keep surface temperatures at 2020 levels. Zonally and monthly averaged vertical profiles of O3, SO2, and sulfate aerosols, at 30 N and 70 N, served as input into a radiative transfer model, to compute biologically active irradiances for DNA damage (iDNA), UV index (UVI), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and two key tropospheric photodissociation coefficients (jO1D for O3 + hν (λ < 330 nm) → O(1D) + O2; and jNO2 for NO2 + hν (λ < 420 nm) → O(3P) + NO). We show that the geoengineering scenario is accompanied by substantial reductions in UV radiation. For example, comparing March 2080 to March 2020, iDNA decreased by 25% to 29% in the subtropics (30 N) and by 26% to 33% in the polar regions (70 N); UVI decreased by 19% to 20% atmore » 30 N and 23% to 26% at 70 N; and jO1D decreased by 22% to 24% at 30 N and 35% to 40% at 70 N, with comparable contributions from sulfate scattering and stratospheric O3 recovery. Different responses were found for processes that depend on longer UV and visible wavelengths, as these are minimally affected by ozone; PAR and jNO2 were only slightly lower (9–12%) at 30 N, but much lower at 70 N (35–40%). Similar reductions were estimated for other months (June, September, and December). Large increases in the PAR diffuse-direct ratio occurred in agreement with previous studies. Absorption by SO2 gas had a small (~1%) effect on jO1D, iDNA, and UVI, and no effect on jNO2 and PAR.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3];  [1]
  1. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States)
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  3. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1507988
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-138064
Journal ID: ISSN 2073-4433; ATMOCZ
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Atmosphere (Basel)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Atmosphere (Basel); Journal Volume: 9; Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 2073-4433
Publisher:
MDPI
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; 42 ENGINEERING; geoengineering; sulfate aerosols; stratosphere; stratospheric ozone; ultraviolet radiation; erythemal radiation; photolysis coefficients; photosynthetically active radiation (PAR); direct-diffuse ratio

Citation Formats

Madronich, Sasha, Tilmes, Simone, Kravitz, Benjamin S., MacMartin, Douglas, and Richter, Jadwiga. Response of Surface Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation to Stratospheric SO2 Injections. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.3390/atmos9110432.
Madronich, Sasha, Tilmes, Simone, Kravitz, Benjamin S., MacMartin, Douglas, & Richter, Jadwiga. Response of Surface Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation to Stratospheric SO2 Injections. United States. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110432
Madronich, Sasha, Tilmes, Simone, Kravitz, Benjamin S., MacMartin, Douglas, and Richter, Jadwiga. Wed . "Response of Surface Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation to Stratospheric SO2 Injections". United States. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110432. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1507988.
@article{osti_1507988,
title = {Response of Surface Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation to Stratospheric SO2 Injections},
author = {Madronich, Sasha and Tilmes, Simone and Kravitz, Benjamin S. and MacMartin, Douglas and Richter, Jadwiga},
abstractNote = {Climate modification by stratospheric SO2 injections, to form sulfate aerosols, may alter the spectral and angular distributions of the solar ultraviolet and visible radiation that reach the Earth’s surface, with potential consequences to environmental photobiology and photochemistry. We used modeling results from the CESM1(WACCM) stratospheric aerosol geoengineering large ensemble (GLENS) project, following the RCP8.5 emission scenario, and one geoengineering experiment with SO2 injections in the stratosphere, designed to keep surface temperatures at 2020 levels. Zonally and monthly averaged vertical profiles of O3, SO2, and sulfate aerosols, at 30 N and 70 N, served as input into a radiative transfer model, to compute biologically active irradiances for DNA damage (iDNA), UV index (UVI), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and two key tropospheric photodissociation coefficients (jO1D for O3 + hν (λ < 330 nm) → O(1D) + O2; and jNO2 for NO2 + hν (λ < 420 nm) → O(3P) + NO). We show that the geoengineering scenario is accompanied by substantial reductions in UV radiation. For example, comparing March 2080 to March 2020, iDNA decreased by 25% to 29% in the subtropics (30 N) and by 26% to 33% in the polar regions (70 N); UVI decreased by 19% to 20% at 30 N and 23% to 26% at 70 N; and jO1D decreased by 22% to 24% at 30 N and 35% to 40% at 70 N, with comparable contributions from sulfate scattering and stratospheric O3 recovery. Different responses were found for processes that depend on longer UV and visible wavelengths, as these are minimally affected by ozone; PAR and jNO2 were only slightly lower (9–12%) at 30 N, but much lower at 70 N (35–40%). Similar reductions were estimated for other months (June, September, and December). Large increases in the PAR diffuse-direct ratio occurred in agreement with previous studies. Absorption by SO2 gas had a small (~1%) effect on jO1D, iDNA, and UVI, and no effect on jNO2 and PAR.},
doi = {10.3390/atmos9110432},
journal = {Atmosphere (Basel)},
number = 11,
volume = 9,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Nov 07 00:00:00 EST 2018},
month = {Wed Nov 07 00:00:00 EST 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 15 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables:

Table 1 Table 1: The simulations used in this study performed with the Community Earth System Model, version 1 (CESM1), using the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) as its atmospheric component.

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research
journal, September 2013

  • Hurrell, James W.; Holland, M. M.; Gent, P. R.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 94, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00121.1

Impact of geoengineered aerosols on the troposphere and stratosphere
journal, January 2009

  • Tilmes, Simone; Garcia, Rolando R.; Kinnison, Douglas E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue D12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JD011420

Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink
journal, April 2009

  • Mercado, Lina M.; Bellouin, Nicolas; Sitch, Stephen
  • Nature, Vol. 458, Issue 7241
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature07949

Measured UV spectra compared with discrete ordinate method simulations
journal, January 1994

  • Zeng, Jun; McKenzie, Richard; Stamnes, Knut
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 99, Issue D11
  • DOI: 10.1029/94JD02145

CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project
journal, November 2018

  • Tilmes, Simone; Richter, Jadwiga H.; Kravitz, Ben
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 99, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0267.1

Comparison of Models Used for UV Index Calculations
journal, June 1998


Responses of the tropospheric ozone and odd hydrogen radicals to column ozone change
journal, April 1988

  • Liu, S. C.; Trainer, M.
  • Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00053857

Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere
journal, January 2015

  • Weisenstein, D. K.; Keith, D. W.; Dykema, J. A.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-11835-2015

Radiative and Chemical Response to Interactive Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols in Fully Coupled CESM1(WACCM)
journal, December 2017

  • Mills, Michael J.; Richter, Jadwiga H.; Tilmes, Simone
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JD027006

First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives
journal, December 2017

  • Kravitz, Ben; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Mills, Michael J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JD026874

The Wavelengths in Sunlight Effective in Producing Skin Cancer: A Theoretical Analysis
journal, September 1974


The effect of volcanic aerosols on ultraviolet radiation in Antarctica
journal, January 1996

  • Tsitas, Steven R.; Yung, Yuk L.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 23, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/95GL03592

Ozone depletion and climate change: impacts on UV radiation
journal, January 2011

  • McKenzie, R. L.; Aucamp, P. J.; Bais, A. F.
  • Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1039/c0pp90034f

Stratospheric solar geoengineering without ozone loss
journal, December 2016

  • Keith, David W.; Weisenstein, Debra K.; Dykema, John A.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue 52
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615572113

Stratospheric Dynamical Response and Ozone Feedbacks in the Presence of SO 2 Injections
journal, December 2017

  • Richter, Jadwiga H.; Tilmes, Simone; Mills, Michael J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JD026912

Enhancement of atmospheric radiation by an aerosol layer
journal, January 1992

  • Michelangeli, Diane V.; Allen, Mark; Yung, Yuk L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 97, Issue D1
  • DOI: 10.1029/91JD01308

Photodissociation in the atmosphere: 1. Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds
journal, January 1987


El Chichon volcanic aerosols: Impact of radiative, thermal, and chemical perturbations
journal, January 1989

  • Michelangeli, Diane V.; Allen, Mark; Yung, Yuk L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 94, Issue D15
  • DOI: 10.1029/JD094iD15p18429

The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions
journal, January 2012

  • Guenther, A. B.; Jiang, X.; Heald, C. L.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 5, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012

Effects of stratospheric ozone recovery on photochemistry and ozone air quality in the troposphere
journal, January 2014


Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
journal, January 2018

  • Ji, Duoying; Fang, Songsong; Curry, Charles L.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018

Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate
journal, January 2016


Effect of aerosols and NO 2 concentration on ultraviolet actinic flux near Mexico City during MILAGRO: measurements and model calculations
journal, January 2013

  • Palancar, G. G.; Lefer, B. L.; Hall, S. R.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 13, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-13-1011-2013

Know Your Standard: Clarifying the CIE Erythema Action Spectrum
journal, January 2011


Analysis of two balloon experiments in coincidence with SAGE II in case of large stratospheric aerosol amount: Post-Pinatubo period
journal, January 1996

  • Brogniez, C.; Lenoble, J.; Herman, M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 101, Issue D1
  • DOI: 10.1029/95JD01640

Impact of recent total ozone changes on tropospheric ozone photodissociation, hydroxyl radicals, and methane trends
journal, March 1992

  • Madronich, Sasha; Granier, Claire
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 19, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/92GL00378

Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO 2 with TiO 2 and SiO 2 aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering
journal, January 2016

  • Tang, Mingjin; Keeble, James; Telford, Paul J.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 16, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-15397-2016

The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations
journal, December 2017

  • MacMartin, Douglas G.; Kravitz, Ben; Tilmes, Simone
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JD026868

Absorption Spectrum of DNA for Wavelengths Greater than 300 nm
journal, June 1981

  • Sutherland, John Clark; Griffin, Kathleen Pietruszka
  • Radiation Research, Vol. 86, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2307/3575456

Response of surface ozone over the continental United States to UV radiation declines from the expected recovery of stratospheric ozone
journal, October 2018


Sulfur injections for a cooler planet
journal, July 2017


Increased transmission of ultraviolet radiation to the surface due to stratospheric scattering
journal, April 1993

  • Davies, Roger
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 98, Issue D4
  • DOI: 10.1029/93JD00408

Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure
journal, August 2018


Impacts of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on tropospheric ozone
journal, January 2017

  • Xia, Lili; Nowack, Peer J.; Tilmes, Simone
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-11913-2017

Effects of Different Stratospheric SO 2 Injection Altitudes on Stratospheric Chemistry and Dynamics
journal, May 2018

  • Tilmes, Simone; Richter, Jadwiga H.; Mills, Michael J.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017JD028146

Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GeoMIP ozone response
journal, March 2014

  • Pitari, Giovanni; Aquila, Valentina; Kravitz, Ben
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JD020566

Enhancements in biologically effective ultraviolet radiation following volcanic eruptions
journal, September 1992

  • Vogelmann, A. M.; Ackerman, T. P.; Turco, R. P.
  • Nature, Vol. 359, Issue 6390
  • DOI: 10.1038/359047a0

Geoengineering: Whiter skies?: GEOENGINEERING WHITER SKIES
journal, June 2012

  • Kravitz, Ben; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Caldeira, Ken
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL051652

Sensitivity of tropospheric oxidants to global chemical and climate change
journal, January 1989

  • Thompson, Anne M.; Stewart, Richard W.; Owens, Melody A.
  • Atmospheric Environment (1967), Vol. 23, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(89)90001-2

Heterogeneous reaction of N 2 O 5 with airborne TiO 2 particles and its implication for stratospheric particle injection
journal, January 2014

  • Tang, M. J.; Telford, P. J.; Pope, F. D.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 14, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-6035-2014

Depletion of stratospheric ozone over the Antarctic and Arctic: Responses of plants of polar terrestrial ecosystems to enhanced UV-B, an overview
journal, October 2005


Works referencing / citing this record:

Climate Response to Pulse Versus Sustained Stratospheric Aerosol Forcing
journal, August 2019

  • Duan, Lei; Cao, Long; Bala, Govindasamy
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019gl083701

Ozone depletion, ultraviolet radiation, climate change and prospects for a sustainable future
journal, June 2019

  • Barnes, Paul W.; Williamson, Craig E.; Lucas, Robyn M.
  • Nature Sustainability, Vol. 2, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0314-2

Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
journal, January 2021

  • Kravitz, Ben; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Visioni, Daniele
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 21, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021

Figures/Tables have been extracted from DOE-funded journal article accepted manuscripts.