DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Removal of inorganic mercury by selective extraction and coprecipitation for determination of methylmercury in mercury-contaminated soils by chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS)

Abstract

A procedure is developed for selective extraction of methylmercury (CH3Hg+) from heavily Hg-contaminated soils and sediments for determination by chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS). Soils artificially contaminated with 40 μg g–1 inorganic mercury (Hg2+) or methylmercury chloride (CH3HgCl) were agitated by shaking or exposing to ultrasounds in dilute hydrochloric acid (HCl) or nitric acid (HNO3) solutions at room temperature. Extractions in HCl (5 or 10% v/v) resulted in substantial leaching of Hg2+ from soils, whereas 5% (v/v) HNO3 provided selectivity for quantitative extraction of CH3Hg+ with minimum Hg2+ leaching. Agitation with ultrasounds in 5% (v/v) HNO3 for about 3 min was sufficient for extraction of all CH3Hg+ from soils. Coprecipitations with Fe(OH)3, Bi(OH)3 and HgS were investigated for removal of residual Hg2+ in soil extracts. Hydroxide precipitations were not effective. Thiourea or l-cysteine added to soil extracts prior to hydroxide precipitation improved precipitation of Hg2+, but also resulted in removal of CH3Hg+. HgS precipitation was made with dilute ammonium sulfide solution, (NH4)2S. Adding 30 μL of 0.35 mol L–1 (NH4)2S to soil extracts in 5% (v/v) HNO3 resulted in removal of all residual Hg2+ without impacting CH3Hg+ levels. Vapor generation was carried out by reacting Hg2+-freemore » soil extracts with 1% (m/v) NaBH4. No significant interferences were observed from (NH4)2S on the vapor generation from CH3Hg+. The slopes of the calibration curves for CH3HgCl standard solutions in 5% (v/v) HNO3 with and without (NH4)2S were similar. Limits of detection (LOD, 3s method) were around 0.08 μg L–1 for 5% (v/v) HNO3 blanks (n = 10) and 0.10 μg L–1 for 5% (v/v) HNO3 + 0.005 mol L–1 (NH4)2S blanks (n = 10). Percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) for five replicate measurements varied between 3.1% and 6.4% at 1.0 CH3HgCl level. The method is validated by analysis of two certified reference materials (CRM); purely Methylmercury sediment (SQC1238, 10.00 ± 0.291 ng g–1 CH3Hg+) and Hg-contaminated Estuarine sediment (ERM – CC580, 75 ± 4 ng g–1 CH3Hg+ and 132 ± 3 μg g–1 total Hg). CH3Hg+ values for SQC1238 were between 13.0 and 13.2 ng g–1, and 79 and 81 ng g–1 for ERM – CC580. Hg-contaminated soils (57–96 μg g–1 total Hg) collected from the floodplains of Oak Ridge, TN were analyzed for CH3Hg+ using the procedure by CVG-ICPMS. CH3Hg+ levels ranged from 30 to 51 ng g–1 and did not correlate with total Hg levels (R2 = 0.01).« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3]
  1. Jackson State Univ., Jackson, MS (United States)
  2. Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), Vicksburg, MS (United States)
  3. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM)
OSTI Identifier:
1495997
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Analytica Chimica Acta
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 1041; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0003-2670
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY; Methylmercury; Extraction; Coprecipitation; Soil/sediment; Chemical vapor generation; ICP-MS

Citation Formats

Denmark, Iris S., Begu, Ermira, Arslan, Zikri, Han, Fengxiang X., Seiter-Moser, Jennifer M., and Pierce, Eric M. Removal of inorganic mercury by selective extraction and coprecipitation for determination of methylmercury in mercury-contaminated soils by chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS). United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2018.08.049.
Denmark, Iris S., Begu, Ermira, Arslan, Zikri, Han, Fengxiang X., Seiter-Moser, Jennifer M., & Pierce, Eric M. Removal of inorganic mercury by selective extraction and coprecipitation for determination of methylmercury in mercury-contaminated soils by chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS). United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.08.049
Denmark, Iris S., Begu, Ermira, Arslan, Zikri, Han, Fengxiang X., Seiter-Moser, Jennifer M., and Pierce, Eric M. Tue . "Removal of inorganic mercury by selective extraction and coprecipitation for determination of methylmercury in mercury-contaminated soils by chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS)". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.08.049. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1495997.
@article{osti_1495997,
title = {Removal of inorganic mercury by selective extraction and coprecipitation for determination of methylmercury in mercury-contaminated soils by chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS)},
author = {Denmark, Iris S. and Begu, Ermira and Arslan, Zikri and Han, Fengxiang X. and Seiter-Moser, Jennifer M. and Pierce, Eric M.},
abstractNote = {A procedure is developed for selective extraction of methylmercury (CH3Hg+) from heavily Hg-contaminated soils and sediments for determination by chemical vapor generation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CVG-ICP-MS). Soils artificially contaminated with 40 μg g–1 inorganic mercury (Hg2+) or methylmercury chloride (CH3HgCl) were agitated by shaking or exposing to ultrasounds in dilute hydrochloric acid (HCl) or nitric acid (HNO3) solutions at room temperature. Extractions in HCl (5 or 10% v/v) resulted in substantial leaching of Hg2+ from soils, whereas 5% (v/v) HNO3 provided selectivity for quantitative extraction of CH3Hg+ with minimum Hg2+ leaching. Agitation with ultrasounds in 5% (v/v) HNO3 for about 3 min was sufficient for extraction of all CH3Hg+ from soils. Coprecipitations with Fe(OH)3, Bi(OH)3 and HgS were investigated for removal of residual Hg2+ in soil extracts. Hydroxide precipitations were not effective. Thiourea or l-cysteine added to soil extracts prior to hydroxide precipitation improved precipitation of Hg2+, but also resulted in removal of CH3Hg+. HgS precipitation was made with dilute ammonium sulfide solution, (NH4)2S. Adding 30 μL of 0.35 mol L–1 (NH4)2S to soil extracts in 5% (v/v) HNO3 resulted in removal of all residual Hg2+ without impacting CH3Hg+ levels. Vapor generation was carried out by reacting Hg2+-free soil extracts with 1% (m/v) NaBH4. No significant interferences were observed from (NH4)2S on the vapor generation from CH3Hg+. The slopes of the calibration curves for CH3HgCl standard solutions in 5% (v/v) HNO3 with and without (NH4)2S were similar. Limits of detection (LOD, 3s method) were around 0.08 μg L–1 for 5% (v/v) HNO3 blanks (n = 10) and 0.10 μg L–1 for 5% (v/v) HNO3 + 0.005 mol L–1 (NH4)2S blanks (n = 10). Percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) for five replicate measurements varied between 3.1% and 6.4% at 1.0 CH3HgCl level. The method is validated by analysis of two certified reference materials (CRM); purely Methylmercury sediment (SQC1238, 10.00 ± 0.291 ng g–1 CH3Hg+) and Hg-contaminated Estuarine sediment (ERM – CC580, 75 ± 4 ng g–1 CH3Hg+ and 132 ± 3 μg g–1 total Hg). CH3Hg+ values for SQC1238 were between 13.0 and 13.2 ng g–1, and 79 and 81 ng g–1 for ERM – CC580. Hg-contaminated soils (57–96 μg g–1 total Hg) collected from the floodplains of Oak Ridge, TN were analyzed for CH3Hg+ using the procedure by CVG-ICPMS. CH3Hg+ levels ranged from 30 to 51 ng g–1 and did not correlate with total Hg levels (R2 = 0.01).},
doi = {10.1016/j.aca.2018.08.049},
journal = {Analytica Chimica Acta},
number = C,
volume = 1041,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Aug 28 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Tue Aug 28 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 21 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review
journal, March 2002

  • Grigal, D. F.
  • Environmental Reviews, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1139/a01-013

Mechanisms Regulating Mercury Bioavailability for Methylating Microorganisms in the Aquatic Environment: A Critical Review
journal, February 2013

  • Hsu-Kim, Heileen; Kucharzyk, Katarzyna H.; Zhang, Tong
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/es304370g

In situ remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil
journal, April 2015

  • He, Feng; Gao, Jie; Pierce, Eric
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 22, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4316-y

History of mercury use and environmental contamination at the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant
journal, January 2011


Elemental mercury neurotoxicity and clinical recovery of function: A review of findings, and implications for occupational health
journal, May 2018


Heavy metals: Implications associated to fish consumption
journal, November 2008

  • Castro-González, M. I.; Méndez-Armenta, M.
  • Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 26, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2008.06.001

The Genetic Basis for Bacterial Mercury Methylation
journal, February 2013


Oxidation and methylation of dissolved elemental mercury by anaerobic bacteria
journal, August 2013

  • Hu, Haiyan; Lin, Hui; Zheng, Wang
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 6, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1894

Determination and speciation of mercury in environmental and biological samples by analytical atomic spectrometry
journal, July 2012


Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter––a review
journal, April 2004


Potential Hg methylation and MeHg demethylation rates related to the nutrient status of different boreal wetlands
journal, April 2011


Is total mercury concentration a good predictor of methyl mercury concentration in aquatic systems?
journal, February 1995

  • Kelly, Carol A.; Rudd, John W. M.; St. Louis, Vincent L.
  • Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, Vol. 80, Issue 1-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF01189723

Simultaneous determination of mercury methylation and demethylation capacities of various sulfate-reducing bacteria using species-specific isotopic tracers
journal, December 2010

  • Bridou, Romain; Monperrus, Mathilde; Gonzalez, Pablo Rodriguez
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 30, Issue 2, p. 337-344
  • DOI: 10.1002/etc.395

Temporal and spatial variation in the mechanisms used by microorganisms to form methylmercury in the water column of Changshou Lake
journal, September 2018


Methylmercury determination in biota by solid-phase microextraction
journal, December 2007


Methods and recent advances in speciation analysis of mercury chemical species in environmental samples: a review
journal, March 2016


Determination of trace mercury in environmental samples by cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry after cloud point extraction
journal, August 2010


Determination of Hg and organomercury species following SPME: A review
journal, October 2008


Determination of trace lanthanides and yttrium in seawater by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after preconcentration with solvent extraction and back-extraction
journal, December 1990

  • Shabani, Mohammad B.; Akagi, Tasuku.; Shimizu, Hiroshi.
  • Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 62, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1021/ac00223a012

Methods for the determination and speciation of mercury in natural waters—A review
journal, March 2010

  • Leopold, Kerstin; Foulkes, Michael; Worsfold, Paul
  • Analytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 663, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.048

Methylmercury speciation in fish muscle by HPLC-ICP-MS following enzymatic hydrolysis
journal, January 2009

  • Lemes, Marcos; Wang, Feiyue
  • Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 24, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1039/b819957b

An accurate and sensitive method for the determination of methylmercury in biological specimens using GC-ICP-MS with solid phase microextraction
journal, January 2004

  • Davis, W. Clay; Vander Pol, Stacy S.; Schantz, Michele M.
  • Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 19, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1039/b412668h

Determination of methylmercury in marine biota samples: Method validation
journal, May 2014


Determination of methylmercury in marine sediment samples: Method validation and occurrence data
journal, January 2015


Chemical Vapor Generation for Determination of Mercury by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
journal, March 2007


Development of a solid phase extraction method for the multielement determination of trace metals in natural waters including sea-water by FI-ICP-MS
journal, March 2012

  • Sánchez Trujillo, Irene; Vereda Alonso, Elisa; García de Torres, Amparo
  • Microchemical Journal, Vol. 101
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2011.11.003

Measurement of mercury species in sediments and soils by HPLC–ICPMS
journal, July 2015


Suitable extraction of soils and sediments for mercury species and determination combined with the cold vapor generation atomic absorption spectrometry technique
journal, January 2016


Estimation of mercury speciation in soil standard reference materials with different extraction methods by ion chromatography coupled with ICP-MS
journal, November 2010

  • Park, Misun; Yoon, Hyeon; Yoon, Cheolho
  • Environmental Geochemistry and Health, Vol. 33, Issue S1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10653-010-9363-1

Determination of Methylmercury Compounds in Foodstuffs. II. Determination of Methylmercury in Fish, Egg, Meat, and Liver.
journal, January 1967


Determination of organic mercury species in soils by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection
journal, January 1992

  • Hempel, Maximilian; Hintelmann, Holger; Wilken, Rolf-Dieter
  • The Analyst, Vol. 117, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1039/an9921700669

Determination of monomethylmercury in low- and high-polluted sediments by microwave extraction and gas chromatography with atomic fluorescence detection
journal, February 2008

  • Berzas Nevado, J. J.; Rodríguez Martín-Doimeadios, R. C.; Guzmán Bernardo, F. J.
  • Analytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 608, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.12.001

Coprecipitation of mercury(II) with iron(III) hydroxide
journal, April 1979

  • Inoue, Yoshikazu; Munemori, Makoto
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 13, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/es60152a001

Irreversible precipitation of mercury and lead
journal, June 2001


Review of metal sulphide precipitation
journal, September 2010


Fractionation studies of mercury in soils and sediments: A review of the chemical reagents used for mercury extraction
journal, January 2009


Works referencing / citing this record:

A voltammetric biosensor for mercury(II) using reduced graphene oxide@gold nanorods and thymine-Hg(II)-thymine interaction
journal, March 2019


Atomic spectrometry update – a review of advances in environmental analysis
journal, January 2020

  • Bacon, Jeffrey R.; Butler, Owen T.; Cairns, Warren R. L.
  • Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 35, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9ja90060h

Microwave Assisted Synthesis of Polyvinylbutyral-silica Composites for Mercury Removal Application
journal, February 2019


Multivariate assessment of extraction conditions for the fractionation analysis of mercury in oily sludge samples using cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry
journal, January 2019

  • Pereira, Letícia; Maranhão, Tatiane de Andrade; Frescura, Vera L. A.
  • Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 34, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1039/c9ja00179d

Atomic spectrometry update – a review of advances in environmental analysis
journal, January 2021

  • Bacon, Jeffrey R.; Butler, Owen T.; Cairns, Warren R. L.
  • Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 36, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1039/d0ja90074e

Atomic spectrometry update – a review of advances in environmental analysis
journal, January 2022

  • Bacon, Jeffrey R.; Butler, Owen T.; Cairns, Warren R. L.
  • Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Vol. 37, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1039/d1ja90054d