Pressure Monitoring to Detect Fault Rupture Due to CO2 Injection
Abstract
The capacity for fault systems to be reactivated by fluid injection is well-known. In the context of CO2 sequestration, however, the consequence of reactivated faults with respect to leakage and monitoring is poorly understood. Using multi-phase fluid flow simulations, this study addresses key questions concerning the likelihood of ruptures, the timing of consequent upward leakage of CO2, and the effectiveness of pressure monitoring in the reservoir and overlying zones for rupture detection. A range of injection scenarios was simulated using random sampling of uncertain parameters. These include the assumed distance between the injector and the vulnerable fault zone, the critical overpressure required for the fault to rupture, reservoir permeability, and the CO2 injection rate. We assumed a conservative scenario, in which if at any time during the five-year simulations the critical fault overpressure is exceeded, the fault permeability is assumed to instantaneously increase. For the purposes of conservatism we assume that CO2 injection continues ‘blindly’ after fault rupture. We show that, despite this assumption, in most cases the CO2 plume does not reach the base of the ruptured fault after 5 years. As a result, one possible implication of this result is that leak mitigation strategies such as pressure managementmore »
- Authors:
-
- Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
- The Univ. of Aukland, Auckland (New Zealand)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE), Clean Coal and Carbon Management
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1417169
- Report Number(s):
- LA-UR-17-28171
Journal ID: ISSN 1876-6102
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC52-06NA25396
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Energy Procedia
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 114; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 1876-6102
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 58 GEOSCIENCES; Earth Sciences; leak detection; pressure monitoring; fault rupture
Citation Formats
Keating, Elizabeth, Dempsey, David, and Pawar, Rajesh. Pressure Monitoring to Detect Fault Rupture Due to CO2 Injection. United States: N. p., 2017.
Web. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1529.
Keating, Elizabeth, Dempsey, David, & Pawar, Rajesh. Pressure Monitoring to Detect Fault Rupture Due to CO2 Injection. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1529
Keating, Elizabeth, Dempsey, David, and Pawar, Rajesh. Fri .
"Pressure Monitoring to Detect Fault Rupture Due to CO2 Injection". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1529. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1417169.
@article{osti_1417169,
title = {Pressure Monitoring to Detect Fault Rupture Due to CO2 Injection},
author = {Keating, Elizabeth and Dempsey, David and Pawar, Rajesh},
abstractNote = {The capacity for fault systems to be reactivated by fluid injection is well-known. In the context of CO2 sequestration, however, the consequence of reactivated faults with respect to leakage and monitoring is poorly understood. Using multi-phase fluid flow simulations, this study addresses key questions concerning the likelihood of ruptures, the timing of consequent upward leakage of CO2, and the effectiveness of pressure monitoring in the reservoir and overlying zones for rupture detection. A range of injection scenarios was simulated using random sampling of uncertain parameters. These include the assumed distance between the injector and the vulnerable fault zone, the critical overpressure required for the fault to rupture, reservoir permeability, and the CO2 injection rate. We assumed a conservative scenario, in which if at any time during the five-year simulations the critical fault overpressure is exceeded, the fault permeability is assumed to instantaneously increase. For the purposes of conservatism we assume that CO2 injection continues ‘blindly’ after fault rupture. We show that, despite this assumption, in most cases the CO2 plume does not reach the base of the ruptured fault after 5 years. As a result, one possible implication of this result is that leak mitigation strategies such as pressure management have a reasonable chance of preventing a CO2 leak.},
doi = {10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1529},
journal = {Energy Procedia},
number = C,
volume = 114,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Aug 18 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Fri Aug 18 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}
Web of Science