DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions

Abstract

Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85% of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [2];  [6]; ORCiD logo [5];  [5];  [7];  [8]; ORCiD logo [9];  [10];  [11]; ORCiD logo [12];  [13];  [4]; ORCiD logo [5];  [7];  [4] more »; ORCiD logo [14]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [5];  [15];  [16]; ORCiD logo [17];  [17] « less
  1. Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States). School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability
  2. Carnegie Inst. for Science, Stanford, CA (United States). Dept. of Global Ecology
  3. Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States). School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability; Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA (United States)
  4. Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Gif-sur-Yvette (France). Inst. Pierre Simon Laplace. Climate and Environment Sciences Lab. (IPSL-LSCE)
  5. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Environmental Sciences Division. Climate Change Science Inst.
  6. Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO (United States). National Snow and Ice Data Center. Cooperative Inst. for Research in Environmental Sciences
  7. California Inst. of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States). Jet Propulsion Lab.
  8. Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME (United States). School of Forest Resources
  9. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States). Atmospheric and Global Change Division
  10. National Inst. for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba (Japan)
  11. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL (United States)
  12. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States). Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division; Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China). State Key Lab. of Hydroscience and Engineering. Dept. of Hydraulic Engineering
  13. Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA (United States). Dept. of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology
  14. Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT (United States). Dept. of Ecology
  15. Auburn Univ., AL (United States). International Center for Climate and Global Change Research. School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences
  16. NASA Ames Research Center (ARC), Moffett Field, Mountain View, CA (United States)
  17. Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States). Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, AZ (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); NASA Ames Research Center (ARC), Moffett Field, Mountain View, CA (United States); California Institute of Technology (CalTech), Pasadena, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
1394481
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1468064
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; NNX10AG01A; NNH10AN681
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Scientific Reports
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 7; Journal ID: ISSN 2045-2322
Publisher:
Nature Publishing Group
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; carbon cycle

Citation Formats

Huntzinger, D. N., Michalak, A. M., Schwalm, C., Ciais, P., King, A. W., Fang, Y., Schaefer, K., Wei, Y., Cook, R. B., Fisher, J. B., Hayes, D., Huang, M., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Lei, H., Lu, C., Maignan, F., Mao, J., Parazoo, N., Peng, S., Poulter, B., Ricciuto, Daniel M., Shi, X., Tian, H., Wang, W., Zeng, N., and Zhao, F. Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2.
Huntzinger, D. N., Michalak, A. M., Schwalm, C., Ciais, P., King, A. W., Fang, Y., Schaefer, K., Wei, Y., Cook, R. B., Fisher, J. B., Hayes, D., Huang, M., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Lei, H., Lu, C., Maignan, F., Mao, J., Parazoo, N., Peng, S., Poulter, B., Ricciuto, Daniel M., Shi, X., Tian, H., Wang, W., Zeng, N., & Zhao, F. Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions. United States. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2
Huntzinger, D. N., Michalak, A. M., Schwalm, C., Ciais, P., King, A. W., Fang, Y., Schaefer, K., Wei, Y., Cook, R. B., Fisher, J. B., Hayes, D., Huang, M., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Lei, H., Lu, C., Maignan, F., Mao, J., Parazoo, N., Peng, S., Poulter, B., Ricciuto, Daniel M., Shi, X., Tian, H., Wang, W., Zeng, N., and Zhao, F. Thu . "Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions". United States. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1394481.
@article{osti_1394481,
title = {Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions},
author = {Huntzinger, D. N. and Michalak, A. M. and Schwalm, C. and Ciais, P. and King, A. W. and Fang, Y. and Schaefer, K. and Wei, Y. and Cook, R. B. and Fisher, J. B. and Hayes, D. and Huang, M. and Ito, A. and Jain, A. K. and Lei, H. and Lu, C. and Maignan, F. and Mao, J. and Parazoo, N. and Peng, S. and Poulter, B. and Ricciuto, Daniel M. and Shi, X. and Tian, H. and Wang, W. and Zeng, N. and Zhao, F.},
abstractNote = {Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85% of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
number = ,
volume = 7,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Jul 06 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Thu Jul 06 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 129 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Global carbon budget 2014
text, January 2015


Reduction in carbon uptake during turn of the century drought in western North America
journal, July 2012

  • Schwalm, Christopher R.; Williams, Christopher A.; Schaefer, Kevin
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 5, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1529

Terrestrial nitrogen–carbon cycle interactions at the global scale
journal, July 2013

  • Zaehle, S.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 368, Issue 1621
  • DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0125

The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design
journal, January 2013

  • Huntzinger, D. N.; Schwalm, C.; Michalak, A. M.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-6-3977-2013

Land use change and nitrogen feedbacks constrain the trajectory of the land carbon sink
journal, October 2013

  • Gerber, Stefan; Hedin, Lars O.; Keel, Sonja G.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50957

Carbon–nitrogen interactions on land at global scales: current understanding in modelling climate biosphere feedbacks
journal, October 2011


Feedbacks between deforestation, climate, and hydrology in the Southwestern Amazon: implications for the provision of ecosystem services
journal, December 2013

  • Lima, Letícia S.; Coe, Michael T.; Soares Filho, Britaldo S.
  • Landscape Ecology, Vol. 29, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9962-1

Uncertainty in weather and climate prediction
journal, December 2011

  • Slingo, Julia; Palmer, Tim
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 369, Issue 1956
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0161

Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability
journal, February 2013

  • Cox, Peter M.; Pearson, David; Booth, Ben B.
  • Nature, Vol. 494, Issue 7437
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11882

Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe
journal, December 2013

  • Peñuelas, Josep; Poulter, Benjamin; Sardans, Jordi
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 4, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3934

Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe
journal, December 2013

  • Peñuelas, Josep; Poulter, Benjamin; Sardans, Jordi
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 4, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3934

Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the past 50 years
journal, August 2012

  • Ballantyne, A. P.; Alden, C. B.; Miller, J. B.
  • Nature, Vol. 488, Issue 7409
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11299

Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
journal, November 2009

  • Le Quéré, Corinne; Raupach, Michael R.; Canadell, Josep G.
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 2, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo689

Global carbon budget 2014
journal, January 2015

  • Le Quéré, C.; Moriarty, R.; Andrew, R. M.
  • Earth System Science Data, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/essd-7-47-2015

Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system
journal, February 2008

  • Lenton, T. M.; Held, H.; Kriegler, E.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705414105

The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990
journal, January 1999


Drivers and patterns of land biosphere carbon balance reversal
journal, March 2016


Reduction in carbon uptake during turn of the century drought in western North America
journal, July 2012

  • Schwalm, Christopher R.; Williams, Christopher A.; Schaefer, Kevin
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 5, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1529

Effect of increasing CO 2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle
journal, December 2014

  • Schimel, David; Stephens, Britton B.; Fisher, Joshua B.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407302112

Modeling suggests fossil fuel emissions have been driving increased land carbon uptake since the turn of the 20th Century
journal, June 2020

  • Schwalm, Christopher R.; Huntzinger, Deborah N.; Michalak, Anna M.
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66103-9

Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system
journal, February 2008

  • Lenton, T. M.; Held, H.; Kriegler, E.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705414105

Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization
journal, December 2015

  • Kolby Smith, W.; Reed, Sasha C.; Cleveland, Cory C.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2879

The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design
journal, January 2013

  • Huntzinger, D. N.; Schwalm, C.; Michalak, A. M.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-2121-2013

NACP MsTMIP Summary of Model Structure and Characteristics
collection, January 2014

  • Huntzinger, D. N.; Schwalm, C. R.; Michalak, A. M.
  • ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center
  • DOI: 10.3334/ornldaac/1228

Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability
journal, April 2015

  • Wieder, William R.; Cleveland, Cory C.; Smith, W. Kolby
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2413

Terrestrial nitrogen–carbon cycle interactions at the global scale
journal, July 2013

  • Zaehle, S.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 368, Issue 1621
  • DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0125

Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
journal, January 2015


Land use change and nitrogen feedbacks constrain the trajectory of the land carbon sink
journal, October 2013

  • Gerber, Stefan; Hedin, Lars O.; Keel, Sonja G.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50957

Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
text, January 2015


Modeling the Terrestrial Biosphere
journal, October 2014


The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design
journal, January 2013

  • Huntzinger, D. N.; Schwalm, C.; Michalak, A. M.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-6-3977-2013

The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 2: Environmental driver data
journal, January 2014

  • Wei, Y.; Liu, S.; Huntzinger, D. N.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 7, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-2875-2014

Bias in the attribution of forest carbon sinks
journal, September 2013

  • Erb, Karl-Heinz; Kastner, Thomas; Luyssaert, Sebastiaan
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 3, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2004

The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 2: Environmental driver data
journal, January 2013

  • Wei, Y.; Liu, S.; Huntzinger, D. N.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 6, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-6-5375-2013

Bias in the attribution of forest carbon sinks
journal, September 2013

  • Erb, Karl-Heinz; Kastner, Thomas; Luyssaert, Sebastiaan
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 3, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2004

Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems
journal, January 2016


Nitrogen deposition: how important is it for global terrestrial carbon uptake?
journal, January 2013


Feedbacks between deforestation, climate, and hydrology in the Southwestern Amazon: implications for the provision of ecosystem services
journal, December 2013

  • Lima, Letícia S.; Coe, Michael T.; Soares Filho, Britaldo S.
  • Landscape Ecology, Vol. 29, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9962-1

Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
journal, January 2015


Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems
journal, January 2016


The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 2: Environmental driver data
journal, January 2013

  • Wei, Y.; Liu, S.; Huntzinger, D. N.
  • Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 6, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmdd-6-5375-2013

Toward “optimal” integration of terrestrial biosphere models
journal, June 2015

  • Schwalm, Christopher R.; Huntzinger, Deborah N.; Fisher, Joshua B.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015gl064002

Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization
journal, December 2015

  • Kolby Smith, W.; Reed, Sasha C.; Cleveland, Cory C.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2879

Carbon–nitrogen interactions on land at global scales: current understanding in modelling climate biosphere feedbacks
journal, October 2011


Modeling the Terrestrial Biosphere
journal, October 2014


Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide
journal, November 2009

  • Le Quéré, Corinne; Raupach, Michael R.; Canadell, Josep G.
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 2, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo689

Increase in observed net carbon dioxide uptake by land and oceans during the past 50 years
journal, August 2012

  • Ballantyne, A. P.; Alden, C. B.; Miller, J. B.
  • Nature, Vol. 488, Issue 7409
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11299

Uncertainty in weather and climate prediction
journal, December 2011

  • Slingo, Julia; Palmer, Tim
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 369, Issue 1956
  • DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0161

Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability
journal, April 2015

  • Wieder, William R.; Cleveland, Cory C.; Smith, W. Kolby
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2413

Effect of increasing CO 2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle
journal, December 2014

  • Schimel, David; Stephens, Britton B.; Fisher, Joshua B.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 112, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407302112

Consequences of Considering Carbon–Nitrogen Interactions on the Feedbacks between Climate and the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle
journal, August 2008

  • Sokolov, Andrei P.; Kicklighter, David W.; Melillo, Jerry M.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 21, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008JCLI2038.1

The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning
journal, March 2017

  • Hourdin, Frédéric; Mauritsen, Thorsten; Gettelman, Andrew
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 98, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1

Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C 4 MIP Model Intercomparison
journal, July 2006

  • Friedlingstein, P.; Cox, P.; Betts, R.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3800.1

Carbon–Concentration and Carbon–Climate Feedbacks in CMIP5 Earth System Models
journal, August 2013

  • Arora, Vivek K.; Boer, George J.; Friedlingstein, Pierre
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00494.1

Emergent constraints on climate-carbon cycle feedbacks in the CMIP5 Earth system models
journal, May 2014

  • Wenzel, Sabrina; Cox, Peter M.; Eyring, Veronika
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 119, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013JG002591

Works referencing / citing this record:

Atmospheric teleconnection influence on North American land surface phenology
journal, March 2018

  • Dannenberg, Matthew P.; Wise, Erika K.; Janko, Mark
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa85a

Extreme climatic events down-regulate the grassland biomass response to elevated carbon dioxide
journal, December 2018


Global to local impacts on atmospheric CO2 caused by COVID-19 lockdown
preprint, January 2020


Trends and controls on water-use efficiency of an old-growth coniferous forest in the Pacific Northwest
journal, July 2019

  • Jiang, Yueyang; Still, Christopher J.; Rastogi, Bharat
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab2612

Forests dominate the interannual variability of the North American carbon sink
journal, August 2018

  • Shiga, Yoichi P.; Michalak, Anna M.; Fang, Yuanyuan
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aad505

Towards a more complete quantification of the global carbon cycle
journal, January 2019

  • Kirschbaum, Miko U. F.; Zeng, Guang; Ximenes, Fabiano
  • Biogeosciences, Vol. 16, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/bg-16-831-2019

Global Carbon Budget 2018
journal, January 2018

  • Le Quéré, Corinne; Andrew, Robbie M.; Friedlingstein, Pierre
  • Earth System Science Data, Vol. 10, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018

Leaf area index identified as a major source of variability in modeled CO2 fertilization
journal, January 2018


Computation and analysis of atmospheric carbon dioxide annual mean growth rates from satellite observations during 2003–2016
journal, January 2018

  • Buchwitz, Michael; Reuter, Maximilian; Schneising, Oliver
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-17355-2018

Reliability ensemble averaging of 21st century projections of terrestrial net primary productivity reduces global and regional uncertainties
journal, January 2018

  • Exbrayat, Jean-François; Bloom, A. Anthony; Falloon, Pete
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-9-153-2018

Vegetation structural change since 1981 significantly enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink
journal, September 2019


Evaluation of simulated soil carbon dynamics in Arctic-Boreal ecosystems
journal, February 2020

  • Huntzinger, D. N.; Schaefer, K.; Schwalm, C.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6784

Global Carbon Budget 2019
journal, January 2019

  • Friedlingstein, Pierre; Jones, Matthew W.; O'Sullivan, Michael
  • Earth System Science Data, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019

Divergence in land surface modeling: linking spread to structure
journal, October 2019

  • Schwalm, Christopher R.; Schaefer, Kevin; Fisher, Joshua B.
  • Environmental Research Communications, Vol. 1, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ab4a8a

Global carbon budget 2019
text, January 2019


Prominence of the tropics in the recent rise of global nitrogen pollution
journal, March 2019


Soil moisture–atmosphere feedback dominates land carbon uptake variability
journal, March 2021


Field-experiment constraints on the enhancement of the terrestrial carbon sink by CO2 fertilization
journal, September 2019


Reduced Summer Aboveground Productivity in Temperate C3 Grasslands Under Future Climate Regimes
journal, May 2018

  • Obermeier, Wolfgang A.; Lehnert, Lukas W.; Ivanov, Martin A.
  • Earth's Future, Vol. 6, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018ef000833

Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives
journal, November 2019

  • Piao, Shilong; Wang, Xuhui; Wang, Kai
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 26, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14884

Including Stable Carbon Isotopes to Evaluate the Dynamics of Soil Carbon in the Land‐Surface Model ORCHIDEE
journal, November 2019

  • Camino‐Serrano, Marta; Tifafi, Marwa; Balesdent, Jérôme
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018ms001392

Vegetation Functional Properties Determine Uncertainty of Simulated Ecosystem Productivity: A Traceability Analysis in the East Asian Monsoon Region
journal, June 2019

  • Cui, Erqian; Huang, Kun; Arain, Muhammad Altaf
  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles, Vol. 33, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018gb005909

Including Stable Carbon Isotopes to Evaluate the Dynamics of Soil Carbon in the Land‐Surface Model ORCHIDEE
journal, November 2019

  • Camino‐Serrano, Marta; Tifafi, Marwa; Balesdent, Jérôme
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018ms001392

The quasi-equilibrium framework revisited: analyzing long-term CO2 enrichment responses in plant–soil models
journal, January 2019

  • Jiang, Mingkai; Zaehle, Sönke; De Kauwe, Martin G.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-2069-2019

Greenhouse Gas Concentration and Volcanic Eruptions Controlled the Variability of Terrestrial Carbon Uptake Over the Last Millennium
journal, June 2019

  • Zhang, Xuanze; Peng, Shushi; Ciais, Philippe
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018ms001566

Global Carbon Budget 2018
text, January 2018

  • Le Quéré, Corinne; Andrew, Robbie M.; Friedlingstein, Pierre
  • Copernicus Publications
  • DOI: 10.7892/boris.141541

Elevated CO 2 does not stimulate carbon sink in a semi-arid grassland
journal, January 2019

  • Song, Jian; Wan, Shiqiang; Piao, Shilong
  • Ecology Letters, Vol. 22, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/ele.13202

Global Carbon Budget 2019
text, January 2019

  • Friedlingstein, Pierre; Jones, Matthew W.; Michael, O&Apos;Sullivan,
  • Copernicus Publications
  • DOI: 10.7892/boris.141543

Climate Sensitivity Controls Uncertainty in Future Terrestrial Carbon Sink
journal, May 2018

  • Schurgers, Guy; Ahlström, Anders; Arneth, Almut
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018gl077528

Carbon and Water Use Efficiencies: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Terrestrial Ecosystem Models under Changing Climate
journal, October 2019

  • El Masri, Bassil; Schwalm, Christopher; Huntzinger, Deborah N.
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50808-7

Modelling carbon sources and sinks in terrestrial vegetation
journal, September 2018

  • Fatichi, Simone; Pappas, Christoforos; Zscheischler, Jakob
  • New Phytologist, Vol. 221, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/nph.15451

Interactions Between Land-Use Change and Climate-Carbon Cycle Feedbacks
journal, April 2018


Global carbon budget 2019
text, January 2019


A review of the major drivers of the terrestrial carbon uptake: model-based assessments, consensus, and uncertainties
journal, September 2019

  • Tharammal, Thejna; Bala, Govindasamy; Devaraju, Narayanappa
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab3012

Carbon and Water Use Efficiencies: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Terrestrial Ecosystem Models under Changing Climate
journal, October 2019

  • El Masri, Bassil; Schwalm, Christopher; Huntzinger, Deborah N.
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50808-7

Greenhouse Gas Concentration and Volcanic Eruptions Controlled the Variability of Terrestrial Carbon Uptake Over the Last Millennium
journal, June 2019

  • Zhang, Xuanze; Peng, Shushi; Ciais, Philippe
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018ms001566