Advanced geophysical underground coal gasification monitoring
Abstract
Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) produces less surface impact, atmospheric pollutants and greenhouse gas than traditional surface mining and combustion. Therefore, it may be useful in mitigating global change caused by anthropogenic activities. Careful monitoring of the UCG process is essential in minimizing environmental impact. In this paper, we first summarize monitoring methods that have been used in previous UCG field trials. We then discuss in more detail a number of promising advanced geophysical techniques. These methods – seismic, electromagnetic, and remote sensing techniques – may provide improved and cost-effective ways to image both the subsurface cavity growth and surface subsidence effects. Active and passive seismic data have the promise to monitor the burn front, cavity growth, and observe cavity collapse events. Electrical resistance tomography (ERT) produces near real time tomographic images autonomously, monitors the burn front and images the cavity using low-cost sensors, typically running within boreholes. Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is a remote sensing technique that has the capability to monitor surface subsidence over the wide area of a commercial-scale UCG operation at a low cost. It may be possible to infer cavity geometry from InSAR (or other surface topography) data using geomechanical modeling. The expected signals frommore »
- Authors:
-
- Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1366915
- Report Number(s):
- LLNL-JRNL-641052
Journal ID: ISSN 1381-2386
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC52-07NA27344
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 21; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 1381-2386
- Publisher:
- Springer
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT; 58 GEOSCIENCES; underground coal gasification; UCG; electrical resistivity tomography; ERT; interferometric synthetic aperture radar; InSAR
Citation Formats
Mellors, Robert, Yang, X., White, J. A., Ramirez, A., Wagoner, J., and Camp, D. W. Advanced geophysical underground coal gasification monitoring. United States: N. p., 2014.
Web. doi:10.1007/s11027-014-9584-1.
Mellors, Robert, Yang, X., White, J. A., Ramirez, A., Wagoner, J., & Camp, D. W. Advanced geophysical underground coal gasification monitoring. United States. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9584-1
Mellors, Robert, Yang, X., White, J. A., Ramirez, A., Wagoner, J., and Camp, D. W. Tue .
"Advanced geophysical underground coal gasification monitoring". United States. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9584-1. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1366915.
@article{osti_1366915,
title = {Advanced geophysical underground coal gasification monitoring},
author = {Mellors, Robert and Yang, X. and White, J. A. and Ramirez, A. and Wagoner, J. and Camp, D. W.},
abstractNote = {Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) produces less surface impact, atmospheric pollutants and greenhouse gas than traditional surface mining and combustion. Therefore, it may be useful in mitigating global change caused by anthropogenic activities. Careful monitoring of the UCG process is essential in minimizing environmental impact. In this paper, we first summarize monitoring methods that have been used in previous UCG field trials. We then discuss in more detail a number of promising advanced geophysical techniques. These methods – seismic, electromagnetic, and remote sensing techniques – may provide improved and cost-effective ways to image both the subsurface cavity growth and surface subsidence effects. Active and passive seismic data have the promise to monitor the burn front, cavity growth, and observe cavity collapse events. Electrical resistance tomography (ERT) produces near real time tomographic images autonomously, monitors the burn front and images the cavity using low-cost sensors, typically running within boreholes. Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) is a remote sensing technique that has the capability to monitor surface subsidence over the wide area of a commercial-scale UCG operation at a low cost. It may be possible to infer cavity geometry from InSAR (or other surface topography) data using geomechanical modeling. The expected signals from these monitoring methods are described along with interpretive modeling for typical UCG cavities. They are illustrated using field results from UCG trials and other relevant subsurface operations.},
doi = {10.1007/s11027-014-9584-1},
journal = {Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change},
number = 4,
volume = 21,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014},
month = {Tue Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014}
}
Web of Science
Figures / Tables:
Works referenced in this record:
Open radar interferometry software for mapping surface Deformation
journal, July 2011
- Sandwell, David; Mellors, Rob; Tong, Xiaopeng
- Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 92, Issue 28
Underground Coal Gasification: A Brief Review of Current Status
journal, September 2009
- Shafirovich, Evgeny; Varma, Arvind
- Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 48, Issue 17
Characterizing 6 August 2007 Crandall Canyon mine collapse from ALOS PALSAR InSAR
journal, March 2010
- Lu, Zhong; Wicks, Charles
- Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, Vol. 1, Issue 1
Mining subsidence and displacement prediction using influence function methods
journal, May 1987
- Ren, G.; Reddish, D. J.; Whittaker, B. N.
- Mining Science and Technology, Vol. 5, Issue 1
Difference Inversion of ERT Data: a Fast Inversion Method for 3-D In Situ Monitoring
journal, June 2001
- LaBrecque, Douglas J.; Yang, Xianjin
- Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Vol. 6, Issue 2
Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement
journal, May 1992
- Daily, William; Ramirez, Abelardo; LaBrecque, Douglas
- Water Resources Research, Vol. 28, Issue 5
Surface subsidence induced by the Crandall Canyon Mine (Utah) collapse: InSAR observations and elasto-plastic modelling: Modelling subsidence from mine collapse
journal, October 2010
- Plattner, C.; Wdowinski, S.; Dixon, T. H.
- Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 183, Issue 3
Deformation mapping in three dimensions for underground mining using InSAR – Southern highland coalfield in New South Wales, Australia
journal, July 2011
- Ng, Alex Hay-Man; Ge, Linlin; Zhang, Kui
- International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 32, Issue 22
Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth's surface
journal, November 1998
- Massonnet, Didier; Feigl, Kurt L.
- Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 36, Issue 4
Ground subsidence resulting from underground gasification of coal. [36 refs]
report, March 1977
- Gregg, D.
Works referencing / citing this record:
Thermo-mechanical coupling numerical simulation method under high temperature heterogeneous rock and application in underground coal gasification
journal, January 2020
- Liu, Xiaopeng; Guo, Guangli; Li, Huaizhan
- Energy Exploration & Exploitation, Vol. 38, Issue 4
Monitoring and Control in Underground Coal Gasification: Current Research Status and Future Perspective
journal, January 2019
- Xiao, Yuteng; Yin, Jihang; Hu, Yifan
- Sustainability, Vol. 11, Issue 1