DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A comparison of simple global kinetic models for coal devolatilization with the CPD model

Abstract

Simulations of coal combustors and gasifiers generally cannot incorporate the complexities of advanced pyrolysis models, and hence there is interest in evaluating simpler models over ranges of temperature and heating rate that are applicable to the furnace of interest. In this paper, six different simple model forms are compared to predictions made by the Chemical Percolation Devolatilization (CPD) model. The model forms included three modified one-step models, a simple two-step model, and two new modified two-step models. These simple model forms were compared over a wide range of heating rates (5 × 103 to 106 K/s) at final temperatures up to 1600 K. Comparisons were made of total volatiles yield as a function of temperature, as well as the ultimate volatiles yield. Advantages and disadvantages for each simple model form are discussed. In conclusion, a modified two-step model with distributed activation energies seems to give the best agreement with CPD model predictions (with the fewest tunable parameters).

Authors:
 [1];  [1]
  1. Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1362067
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1326230; OSTI ID: 1396663
Report Number(s):
DOE-UTAH-DENA-0002375-FLETCHER-0008; DOE-UTAH-RICHARDS-0002
Journal ID: ISSN 0016-2361; PII: S0016236116306986
Grant/Contract Number:  
NA0002375
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Fuel
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 185; Journal Issue: C; Journal ID: ISSN 0016-2361
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT; 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS; 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; coal pyrolysis; coal-fired boilers; CPD modeling; heating rates

Citation Formats

Richards, Andrew P., and Fletcher, Thomas H. A comparison of simple global kinetic models for coal devolatilization with the CPD model. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.095.
Richards, Andrew P., & Fletcher, Thomas H. A comparison of simple global kinetic models for coal devolatilization with the CPD model. United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.095
Richards, Andrew P., and Fletcher, Thomas H. Mon . "A comparison of simple global kinetic models for coal devolatilization with the CPD model". United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.095. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1362067.
@article{osti_1362067,
title = {A comparison of simple global kinetic models for coal devolatilization with the CPD model},
author = {Richards, Andrew P. and Fletcher, Thomas H.},
abstractNote = {Simulations of coal combustors and gasifiers generally cannot incorporate the complexities of advanced pyrolysis models, and hence there is interest in evaluating simpler models over ranges of temperature and heating rate that are applicable to the furnace of interest. In this paper, six different simple model forms are compared to predictions made by the Chemical Percolation Devolatilization (CPD) model. The model forms included three modified one-step models, a simple two-step model, and two new modified two-step models. These simple model forms were compared over a wide range of heating rates (5 × 103 to 106 K/s) at final temperatures up to 1600 K. Comparisons were made of total volatiles yield as a function of temperature, as well as the ultimate volatiles yield. Advantages and disadvantages for each simple model form are discussed. In conclusion, a modified two-step model with distributed activation energies seems to give the best agreement with CPD model predictions (with the fewest tunable parameters).},
doi = {10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.095},
journal = {Fuel},
number = C,
volume = 185,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Mon Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 35 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

CFD modeling of oxy-coal combustion: Prediction of burnout, volatile and NO precursors release
journal, April 2013


Chemical model of coal devolatilization using percolation lattice statistics
journal, March 1989

  • Grant, David M.; Pugmire, Ronald J.; Fletcher, Thomas H.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef00014a011

Chemical percolation model for devolatilization. 3. Direct use of carbon-13 NMR data to predict effects of coal type
journal, July 1992

  • Fletcher, Thomas H.; Kerstein, Alan R.; Pugmire, Ronald J.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 6, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef00034a011

Rapid coal devolatilization as an equilibrium flash distillation
journal, May 1988


General model of coal devolatilization
journal, July 1988

  • Solomon, P. R.; Hamblen, D. G.; Carangelo, R. M.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 2, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef00010a006

Model comparisons with drop tube combustion data for various devolatilization submodels
journal, September 1995

  • Brewster, Brandon S.; Smoot, L. Douglas; Barthelson, Stephen H.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef00053a020

Coal conversion submodels for design applications at elevated pressures. Part II. Char gasification
journal, January 2004


Coal conversion submodels for design applications at elevated pressures. Part I. devolatilization and char oxidation
journal, January 2003


Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulations of a Pilot-Scale Transport Coal Gasifier: Evaluation of Reaction Kinetics
journal, November 2013

  • Li, Tingwen; Chaudhari, Kiran; VanEssendelft, Dirk
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 27, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef401887r

Kinetics of Thermal Decomposition of Pulverized Coal Particles
journal, October 1970

  • Badzioch, Stanley; Hawksley, Peter G. W.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, Vol. 9, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/i260036a005

Rapid devolatilization of pulverized coal
journal, January 1975


Coal devolatilization
journal, January 1979


Large eddy simulation of a pulverized coal jet flame ignited by a preheated gas flow
journal, January 2011

  • Yamamoto, Kenji; Murota, Tomoya; Okazaki, Teruyuki
  • Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 33, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.113

Large Eddy Simulation of Pulverized Coal Jet Flame Ignition Using the Direct Quadrature Method of Moments
journal, October 2012

  • Pedel, Julien; Thornock, Jeremy N.; Smith, Philip J.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 26, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef3012905

A generalized correlation for coal devolatilization kinetics at high temperature
journal, October 2014


An overview of distributed activation energy model and its application in the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass
journal, August 2014


A New Distributed Activation Energy Model Using Weibull Distribution for the Representation of Complex Kinetics
journal, November 1994

  • Lakshmanan, Chittur Chandrasekharan; White, Noam
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef00048a001

Pyrolysis Kinetics of a Green River Oil Shale Using a Pressurized TGA
journal, January 2011

  • Hillier, James L.; Fletcher, Thomas H.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 25, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef101115u

Coal devolatilization and hydrogastification
journal, July 1976


Evaluating the accuracy of the Distributed Activation Energy Model for biomass devolatilization curves obtained at high heating rates
journal, October 2014


Rapid devolatilization of pulverized coal in hot combustion gases
journal, January 1977

  • Ubhayakar, Shivadev K.; Stickler, David B.; Von Rosenberg, Charles W.
  • Symposium (International) on Combustion, Vol. 16, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80342-1

Development and Application of a Correlation of 13 C NMR Chemical Structural Analyses of Coal Based on Elemental Composition and Volatile Matter Content
journal, January 1999

  • Genetti, Dominic; Fletcher, Thomas H.; Pugmire, Ronald J.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef980074k

Prediction of Tar and Light Gas during Pyrolysis of Black Liquor and Biomass
journal, May 2012

  • Fletcher, Thomas H.; Pond, Harland R.; Webster, Jarom
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 26, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef300574n

Modeling Nitrogen Release during Devolatilization on the Basis of Chemical Structure of Coal
journal, September 1999

  • Genetti, Dominic; Fletcher, Thomas H.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef990056i

A comparison of various models in predicting ignition delay in single-particle coal combustion
journal, July 2014


Prediction of Light Gas Composition in Coal Devolatilization
journal, May 2009

  • Jupudi, Ravichandra S.; Zamansky, Vladimir; Fletcher, Thomas H.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 23, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef9001346

Prediction of Sawdust Pyrolysis Yields from a Flat-Flame Burner Using the CPD Model
journal, January 2013

  • Lewis, Aaron D.; Fletcher, Thomas H.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 27, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef3018783

Model for the Evolution of Pore Structure in a Lignite Particle during Pyrolysis
journal, July 2015


Modelling pulverized coal combustion using air and O2+ recirculated flue gas as oxidant
journal, May 2015


Modeling the evolution of particle morphology during coal devolatilization
journal, January 2000


Simulation of Coal Pyrolysis in Plasma Jet by CPD Model
journal, August 2001

  • Tian, Yajun; Xie, Kechang; Zhu, Suyu
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 15, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef0002142

The Chemical Percolation Devolatilization Model Applied to the Devolatilization of Coal in High Intensity Acoustic Fields
journal, January 2002

  • Veras, Carlos A. G.; Carvalho Jr., João A.; Ferreira, Marco A.
  • Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, Vol. 13, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1590/S0103-50532002000300011

Generalized model of heat transfer and volatiles evolution inside particles for coal devolatilization
journal, May 2014

  • Yan, Binhang; Cheng, Yan; Xu, Pengcheng
  • AIChE Journal, Vol. 60, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/aic.14484

Simulation of the Swelling of High-Volatile Bituminous Coal during Pyrolysis
journal, October 2014

  • Yang, He; Li, Sufen; Fletcher, Thomas H.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 28, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef5016846

Simulation of the Evolution of Pressure in a Lignite Particle during Pyrolysis
journal, April 2014

  • Yang, He; Li, Sufen; Fletcher, Thomas H.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 28, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef500584q

Kinetic study of pulverized coal devolatilization for boiler CFD modeling
journal, April 2014


Modelling Pulverised coal Combustion Using a Detailed coal Combustion Model
journal, April 2006

  • Backreedy, R. I.; Fletcher, L. M.; Ma, L.
  • Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 178, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1080/00102200500248532

Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized coal: Characterization, fundamentals, stabilization and CFD modeling
journal, April 2012

  • Chen, Lei; Yong, Sze Zheng; Ghoniem, Ahmed F.
  • Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 38, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.003

Study of the high heating rate devolatilization of a pulverized bituminous coal under oxygen-containing atmospheres
journal, July 2015


Measurements and analysis of temperature histories and size changes for single carbon and coal particles during the early stages of heating and devolatilization
journal, March 1991


Devolatilization of coal particles in a flat flame—experimental and modeling study
journal, October 1995


Devolatilization and combustion characteristics of coal particles
journal, January 1990


Experimental investigation on coal devolatilization at high temperatures with different heating rates
journal, January 2014


Devolatilization of bituminous coals at medium to high heating rates
journal, March 1986


Coal pyrolysis yields from fast and slow heating in a wire-mesh apparatus with a gas sweep
journal, July 1988

  • Gibbins-Matham, Jon; Kandiyoti, Rafael
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 2, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef00010a017

Coal pyrolysis: Experiments, kinetic rates and mechanisms
journal, January 1992

  • Solomon, Peter R.; Serio, Michael A.; Suuberg, Eric M.
  • Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 18, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/0360-1285(92)90021-R

Works referencing / citing this record:

Reduction of a detailed soot model for simulations of pyrolysing solid fuels
journal, August 2019

  • Josephson, Alexander J.; Hopkins, Emily M.; Lignell, David O.
  • Combustion Theory and Modelling, Vol. 24, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1080/13647830.2019.1656823

A complete review based on various aspects of pulverized coal combustion
journal, February 2019

  • Yadav, Sujeet; Mondal, Swasti Sundar
  • International Journal of Energy Research, Vol. 43, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/er.4395

A Kinetic Study on Combustible Coastal Debris Pyrolysis via Thermogravimetric Analysis
journal, March 2019

  • Song, Eunhye; Kim, Daegi; Jeong, Cheol-Jin
  • Energies, Vol. 12, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.3390/en12050836