The weighted priors approach for combining expert opinions in logistic regression experiments
Abstract
When modeling the reliability of a system or component, it is not uncommon for more than one expert to provide very different prior estimates of the expected reliability as a function of an explanatory variable such as age or temperature. Our goal in this paper is to incorporate all information from the experts when choosing a design about which units to test. Bayesian design of experiments has been shown to be very successful for generalized linear models, including logistic regression models. We use this approach to develop methodology for the case where there are several potentially non-overlapping priors under consideration. While multiple priors have been used for analysis in the past, they have never been used in a design context. The Weighted Priors method performs well for a broad range of true underlying model parameter choices and is more robust when compared to other reasonable design choices. Finally, we illustrate the method through multiple scenarios and a motivating example. Additional figures for this article are available in the online supplementary information.
- Authors:
-
- Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA (United States). Dept. of Statistics
- Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1360704
- Report Number(s):
- LA-UR-16-24989
Journal ID: ISSN 0898-2112
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC52-06NA25396
- Resource Type:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Name:
- Quality Engineering
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 29; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 0898-2112
- Publisher:
- American Society for Quality Control
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; Mathematics
Citation Formats
Quinlan, Kevin R., Anderson-Cook, Christine M., and Myers, Kary L. The weighted priors approach for combining expert opinions in logistic regression experiments. United States: N. p., 2017.
Web. doi:10.1080/08982112.2017.1319956.
Quinlan, Kevin R., Anderson-Cook, Christine M., & Myers, Kary L. The weighted priors approach for combining expert opinions in logistic regression experiments. United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2017.1319956
Quinlan, Kevin R., Anderson-Cook, Christine M., and Myers, Kary L. Mon .
"The weighted priors approach for combining expert opinions in logistic regression experiments". United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2017.1319956. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1360704.
@article{osti_1360704,
title = {The weighted priors approach for combining expert opinions in logistic regression experiments},
author = {Quinlan, Kevin R. and Anderson-Cook, Christine M. and Myers, Kary L.},
abstractNote = {When modeling the reliability of a system or component, it is not uncommon for more than one expert to provide very different prior estimates of the expected reliability as a function of an explanatory variable such as age or temperature. Our goal in this paper is to incorporate all information from the experts when choosing a design about which units to test. Bayesian design of experiments has been shown to be very successful for generalized linear models, including logistic regression models. We use this approach to develop methodology for the case where there are several potentially non-overlapping priors under consideration. While multiple priors have been used for analysis in the past, they have never been used in a design context. The Weighted Priors method performs well for a broad range of true underlying model parameter choices and is more robust when compared to other reasonable design choices. Finally, we illustrate the method through multiple scenarios and a motivating example. Additional figures for this article are available in the online supplementary information.},
doi = {10.1080/08982112.2017.1319956},
journal = {Quality Engineering},
number = 3,
volume = 29,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Apr 24 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Mon Apr 24 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}
Web of Science
Works referenced in this record:
Experimental Design for Binary Data
journal, March 1983
- Abdelbasit, K. M.; Plackett, R. L.
- Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 78, Issue 381
On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models
journal, January 1984
- Albert, A.; Anderson, J. A.
- Biometrika, Vol. 71, Issue 1
Optimal Bayesian design applied to logistic regression experiments
journal, February 1989
- Chaloner, Kathryn; Larntz, Kinley
- Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 21, Issue 2
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications
journal, April 1970
- Hastings, W. K.
- Biometrika, Vol. 57, Issue 1
Optimum Designs in Regression Problems
journal, June 1959
- Kiefer, J.; Wolfowitz, J.
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 30, Issue 2
Prediction of Reliability of an Arbitrary System from a Finite Population
journal, December 2010
- Lu, Lu; Anderson-Cook, Christine M.
- Quality Engineering, Vol. 23, Issue 1
The Coordinate-Exchange Algorithm for Constructing Exact Optimal Experimental Designs
journal, February 1995
- Meyer, Ruth K.; Nachtsheim, Christopher J.
- Technometrics, Vol. 37, Issue 1
A Bayesian Model for Integrating Multiple Sources of Lifetime Information in System-Reliability Assessments
journal, April 2011
- Reese, C. Shane; Wilson, Alyson G.; Guo, Jiqiang
- Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 43, Issue 2
Works referencing / citing this record:
How to Host An Effective Data Competition: Statistical Advice for Competition Design and Analysis
journal, February 2019
- Anderson‐Cook, Christine M.; Myers, Kary L.; Lu, Lu
- Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, Vol. 12, Issue 4